From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 30875 invoked by alias); 24 Sep 2002 23:09:40 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gdb-help@sources.redhat.com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-owner@sources.redhat.com Received: (qmail 30841 invoked from network); 24 Sep 2002 23:09:39 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO crack.them.org) (65.125.64.184) by sources.redhat.com with SMTP; 24 Sep 2002 23:09:39 -0000 Received: from nevyn.them.org ([66.93.61.169] ident=mail) by crack.them.org with asmtp (Exim 3.12 #1 (Debian)) id 17tzkC-0003ZS-00; Tue, 24 Sep 2002 19:09:32 -0500 Received: from drow by nevyn.them.org with local (Exim 3.35 #1 (Debian)) id 17tyoO-0003Nt-00; Tue, 24 Sep 2002 19:09:48 -0400 Date: Tue, 24 Sep 2002 16:09:00 -0000 From: Daniel Jacobowitz To: Andrew Cagney Cc: gdb@sources.redhat.com Subject: Re: GNATS: gdb-prs@ -> gdb@? Message-ID: <20020924230947.GB12943@nevyn.them.org> Mail-Followup-To: Andrew Cagney , gdb@sources.redhat.com References: <3D90EC72.7080704@redhat.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <3D90EC72.7080704@redhat.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.1i X-SW-Source: 2002-09/txt/msg00388.txt.bz2 On Tue, Sep 24, 2002 at 06:51:30PM -0400, Andrew Cagney wrote: > Hello, > > Anyone know something about GNATS? > > I think I know why the ``send email to interested parties'' URL on the > GDB's GNATS web page contains: > > nobody@ > The e-mail address of things like ``Responsible: unassigned'' get mapped > onto nobody@ because they can't be mapped onto nothing (That gets > remapped to unassigned@. True?). Same for a few others. I think we > can live with this one. > > gdb-prs@ > The contact address for the ``net'' and ``unknown'' customers is gdb-prs@! > > What do people think of changing this? For instance, just setting it to > gdb@ or nobody@ (like most other things). nobody@ would be preferable to gdb@, I think... > I also don't remember the rationale behind gdb-gnats@ (where to send a > bug report) vs gdb-prs@ (where the bug reports appear). I suspect that > it is to stop people accidently re-sending to gdb-gnats? Isn't gdb-gnats input into the gnats DB, and gdb-prs output from it? -- Daniel Jacobowitz MontaVista Software Debian GNU/Linux Developer