From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 14931 invoked by alias); 24 Sep 2002 22:51:33 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gdb-help@sources.redhat.com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-owner@sources.redhat.com Received: (qmail 14868 invoked from network); 24 Sep 2002 22:51:32 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO localhost.redhat.com) (216.138.202.10) by sources.redhat.com with SMTP; 24 Sep 2002 22:51:32 -0000 Received: from redhat.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by localhost.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id A8D363C64 for ; Tue, 24 Sep 2002 18:51:30 -0400 (EDT) Message-ID: <3D90EC72.7080704@redhat.com> Date: Tue, 24 Sep 2002 15:51:00 -0000 From: Andrew Cagney User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; NetBSD macppc; en-US; rv:1.0.0) Gecko/20020824 X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: gdb@sources.redhat.com Subject: GNATS: gdb-prs@ -> gdb@? Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-SW-Source: 2002-09/txt/msg00386.txt.bz2 Hello, Anyone know something about GNATS? I think I know why the ``send email to interested parties'' URL on the GDB's GNATS web page contains: nobody@ The e-mail address of things like ``Responsible: unassigned'' get mapped onto nobody@ because they can't be mapped onto nothing (That gets remapped to unassigned@. True?). Same for a few others. I think we can live with this one. gdb-prs@ The contact address for the ``net'' and ``unknown'' customers is gdb-prs@! What do people think of changing this? For instance, just setting it to gdb@ or nobody@ (like most other things). I also don't remember the rationale behind gdb-gnats@ (where to send a bug report) vs gdb-prs@ (where the bug reports appear). I suspect that it is to stop people accidently re-sending to gdb-gnats? Andrew