From: Jim Blandy <jimb@codesourcery.com>
To: Nick Roberts <nickrob@snap.net.nz>
Cc: "Vladimir Prus" <ghost@cs.msu.su>, gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com
Subject: Re: Variable objects: references formatting
Date: Fri, 05 May 2006 08:08:00 -0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <vt24q04rj0m.fsf@theseus.home.> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <17498.32925.650883.963202@farnswood.snap.net.nz> (Nick Roberts's message of "Fri, 5 May 2006 10:30:53 +1200")
Nick Roberts <nickrob@snap.net.nz> writes:
> > > OK, if its a patch for -var-valuate-expression then perhaps the BOGUS
> > > comment could be removed as it seems to address this issue.
> >
> > I read the "BOGUS" comment as referring to the fact that we have to
> > specially trap structs and unions, instead of simply passing
> > everything through common_val_print. I don't think this patch affects
> > that "bogusness"; it just makes the workaround work better.
>
> I was guessing. I see that the check is for var->type, whereas
> perhaps val_print prints out children if var->val->type is a
> struct/class. But I don't know the relationship between the two and
> you're the expert in these matters.
Well, I don't feel very expert in MI; I appreciate having other eyes
look stuff over.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2006-05-05 8:08 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 27+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2006-05-03 23:05 Nick Roberts
2006-05-03 23:50 ` Jim Blandy
2006-05-04 1:53 ` Nick Roberts
2006-05-04 17:32 ` Jim Blandy
2006-05-04 22:30 ` Nick Roberts
2006-05-05 8:08 ` Jim Blandy [this message]
2006-05-04 5:30 ` Vladimir Prus
2006-05-04 6:21 ` Nick Roberts
2006-05-04 7:00 ` Vladimir Prus
2006-05-04 7:20 ` Nick Roberts
2006-05-04 12:10 ` Vladimir Prus
2006-05-08 12:41 ` [PATCH] -var-update [was Re: Variable objects: references formatting] Nick Roberts
2006-05-08 17:27 ` Jim Blandy
2006-05-08 21:17 ` Nick Roberts
2006-05-15 16:54 ` Daniel Jacobowitz
2006-05-17 0:45 ` Nick Roberts
2006-05-17 1:28 ` Daniel Jacobowitz
2006-05-17 1:43 ` Nick Roberts
2006-05-17 3:39 ` Daniel Jacobowitz
2006-05-19 7:41 ` [PATCH] -var-update Nick Roberts
2006-05-19 9:47 ` Vladimir Prus
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2006-05-03 9:22 Variable objects: references formatting Vladimir Prus
2006-05-03 17:50 ` Jim Blandy
2006-05-03 18:08 ` Jim Blandy
2006-05-04 5:19 ` Vladimir Prus
2006-05-04 6:08 ` Jim Blandy
2006-05-04 6:10 ` Vladimir Prus
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=vt24q04rj0m.fsf@theseus.home. \
--to=jimb@codesourcery.com \
--cc=gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com \
--cc=ghost@cs.msu.su \
--cc=nickrob@snap.net.nz \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox