From: Eli Zaretskii <eliz@gnu.org>
To: "Marc Khouzam" <marc.khouzam@ericsson.com>
Cc: drow@false.org, nickrob@snap.net.nz, gdb-patches@sourceware.org
Subject: Re: [Patch] -var-evaluate-expression NAME [FORMAT]
Date: Sat, 02 Feb 2008 10:31:00 -0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <uejbvwsyo.fsf@gnu.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <6D19CA8D71C89C43A057926FE0D4ADAA04290E7D@ecamlmw720.eamcs.ericsson.se> (marc.khouzam@ericsson.com)
> Date: Fri, 1 Feb 2008 14:23:19 -0500
> From: "Marc Khouzam" <marc.khouzam@ericsson.com>
> Cc: "Nick Roberts" <nickrob@snap.net.nz>, <gdb-patches@sourceware.org>
>
> > The grammar for MI commands says options always come first. They're
> > optional, anyway, so how about -var-evaluate-expression [-f
> > @var{format-spec}] @var{name}?
>
> Yes, I like that better too.
> I have updated the code, the tests and the doc to follow this format.
> Maybe Eli wants to re-approve?
If you need my reapproval, you've got it. Thanks.
> I rebuilt (not the doc) and ran regression.
^^^^^^^^^^^
Why not?
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2008-02-02 10:31 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 33+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2008-01-22 20:38 Marc Khouzam
2008-01-23 3:04 ` Nick Roberts
2008-01-23 14:30 ` Marc Khouzam
2008-01-23 14:42 ` Daniel Jacobowitz
2008-01-23 17:04 ` Marc Khouzam
2008-01-23 22:09 ` Nick Roberts
2008-01-24 21:36 ` Marc Khouzam
2008-01-25 9:59 ` Eli Zaretskii
2008-01-29 21:45 ` Daniel Jacobowitz
2008-02-01 19:23 ` Marc Khouzam
2008-02-02 10:31 ` Eli Zaretskii [this message]
2008-02-03 19:43 ` Marc Khouzam
2008-02-03 20:01 ` Eli Zaretskii
2008-02-04 14:17 ` Marc Khouzam
2008-02-04 21:00 ` Eli Zaretskii
2008-02-02 11:20 ` Vladimir Prus
2008-02-03 19:55 ` Marc Khouzam
2008-02-03 20:42 ` Joel Brobecker
2008-02-03 21:41 ` Daniel Jacobowitz
2008-02-03 21:46 ` Daniel Jacobowitz
2008-02-04 17:00 ` Marc Khouzam
2008-02-04 17:02 ` Marc Khouzam
2008-02-04 21:40 ` Nick Roberts
2008-02-04 21:53 ` Nick Roberts
2008-02-05 14:47 ` Marc Khouzam
2008-02-05 20:43 ` Nick Roberts
2008-02-05 20:55 ` Marc Khouzam
2008-02-05 21:18 ` Nick Roberts
2008-02-04 17:11 ` Marc Khouzam
2008-01-23 3:48 ` Daniel Jacobowitz
2008-01-23 14:44 ` Marc Khouzam
2008-01-28 14:41 Marc Khouzam
2008-01-28 14:48 ` Daniel Jacobowitz
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=uejbvwsyo.fsf@gnu.org \
--to=eliz@gnu.org \
--cc=drow@false.org \
--cc=gdb-patches@sourceware.org \
--cc=marc.khouzam@ericsson.com \
--cc=nickrob@snap.net.nz \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox