From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 16958 invoked by alias); 2 Feb 2008 10:31:18 -0000 Received: (qmail 16948 invoked by uid 22791); 2 Feb 2008 10:31:18 -0000 X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from romy.inter.net.il (HELO romy.inter.net.il) (213.8.233.24) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.31) with ESMTP; Sat, 02 Feb 2008 10:30:59 +0000 Received: from HOME-C4E4A596F7 ([81.5.35.104]) by romy.inter.net.il (MOS 3.7.3-GA) with ESMTP id KCG63599 (AUTH halo1); Sat, 2 Feb 2008 12:30:35 +0200 (IST) Date: Sat, 02 Feb 2008 10:31:00 -0000 Message-Id: From: Eli Zaretskii To: "Marc Khouzam" CC: drow@false.org, nickrob@snap.net.nz, gdb-patches@sourceware.org In-reply-to: <6D19CA8D71C89C43A057926FE0D4ADAA04290E7D@ecamlmw720.eamcs.ericsson.se> (marc.khouzam@ericsson.com) Subject: Re: [Patch] -var-evaluate-expression NAME [FORMAT] Reply-to: Eli Zaretskii References: <6D19CA8D71C89C43A057926FE0D4ADAA04290E7D@ecamlmw720.eamcs.ericsson.se> X-IsSubscribed: yes Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sourceware.org X-SW-Source: 2008-02/txt/msg00042.txt.bz2 > Date: Fri, 1 Feb 2008 14:23:19 -0500 > From: "Marc Khouzam" > Cc: "Nick Roberts" , > > > The grammar for MI commands says options always come first. They're > > optional, anyway, so how about -var-evaluate-expression [-f > > @var{format-spec}] @var{name}? > > Yes, I like that better too. > I have updated the code, the tests and the doc to follow this format. > Maybe Eli wants to re-approve? If you need my reapproval, you've got it. Thanks. > I rebuilt (not the doc) and ran regression. ^^^^^^^^^^^ Why not?