From: Eli Zaretskii <eliz@gnu.org>
To: gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com
Subject: Re: mi tty commands
Date: Wed, 01 Jun 2005 20:12:00 -0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <u3bs1degj.fsf@gnu.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20050601130653.GA17103@white> (message from Bob Rossi on Wed, 1 Jun 2005 09:06:53 -0400)
> Date: Wed, 1 Jun 2005 09:06:53 -0400
> From: Bob Rossi <bob@brasko.net>
> Cc: gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com
>
> > Which reminds me: now that you introduced "set tty", doesn't that mean
> > we should remove the "tty" command as redundant?
>
> I don't think so. Simply because the tty command has been around for
> ages and FE's depend on it being there. Removing the tty command would
> successfully break every front end.
Not if we leave "tty" as an alias for "set tty". Any objections to do
that as part of your patch?
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2005-06-01 20:12 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 49+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2005-02-24 20:49 Bob Rossi
2005-02-26 4:33 ` Eli Zaretskii
2005-02-26 6:07 ` Bob Rossi
2005-02-26 8:25 ` Daniel Jacobowitz
2005-02-28 20:28 ` Bob Rossi
2005-03-02 2:52 ` Bob Rossi
2005-03-11 2:26 ` Bob Rossi
2005-05-23 3:13 ` Bob Rossi
2005-05-28 23:49 ` Daniel Jacobowitz
2005-05-29 8:37 ` Eli Zaretskii
2005-05-29 16:22 ` Daniel Jacobowitz
2005-05-29 18:10 ` Eli Zaretskii
2005-05-29 19:05 ` Daniel Jacobowitz
2005-05-30 15:48 ` Bob Rossi
2005-06-01 0:14 ` Bob Rossi
2005-06-01 4:00 ` Eli Zaretskii
2005-06-01 13:07 ` Bob Rossi
2005-06-01 17:42 ` Bob Rossi
2005-06-01 20:25 ` Eli Zaretskii
2005-06-02 22:17 ` Bob Rossi
2005-06-03 6:48 ` Eli Zaretskii
2005-06-03 17:32 ` Bob Rossi
2005-06-10 2:28 ` Bob Rossi
2005-06-10 6:36 ` Eli Zaretskii
2005-06-10 11:04 ` Bob Rossi
2005-06-13 3:07 ` Daniel Jacobowitz
2005-06-13 6:09 ` Eli Zaretskii
2005-06-17 21:08 ` Bob Rossi
2005-06-17 21:14 ` Daniel Jacobowitz
2005-06-18 8:27 ` Eli Zaretskii
2005-06-18 12:29 ` Bob Rossi
2005-06-26 13:43 ` Bob Rossi
2005-07-03 18:43 ` Daniel Jacobowitz
2005-07-06 14:54 ` Bob Rossi
2005-07-10 21:08 ` Mark Kettenis
2005-07-10 21:32 ` Bob Rossi
2005-07-11 15:52 ` Bob Rossi
2005-07-11 18:41 ` Mark Kettenis
2005-07-11 20:00 ` Bob Rossi
2005-07-11 20:01 ` Daniel Jacobowitz
2005-07-11 20:44 ` Bob Rossi
2005-07-11 20:55 ` Mark Kettenis
2005-07-11 21:26 ` Bob Rossi
2005-07-12 20:56 ` Mark Kettenis
2005-07-14 14:51 ` Bob Rossi
2005-06-01 20:12 ` Eli Zaretskii [this message]
2005-06-01 20:43 ` Bob Rossi
2005-06-02 3:48 ` Eli Zaretskii
2005-05-30 15:48 ` Bob Rossi
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=u3bs1degj.fsf@gnu.org \
--to=eliz@gnu.org \
--cc=gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox