* [7.7.1] Blocker patch (GCC 4.9 compat)
@ 2014-04-24 22:39 Sergio Durigan Junior
2014-04-24 22:48 ` Joel Brobecker
0 siblings, 1 reply; 3+ messages in thread
From: Sergio Durigan Junior @ 2014-04-24 22:39 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Joel Brobecker; +Cc: GDB Patches
Hi Joel,
I tested the GDB 7.7 branch using GCC 4.9 to build it, and found some
errors.
In file included from ../../gdb/defs.h:104:0,
from ../../gdb/cli/cli-dump.c:22:
../../gdb/cli/cli-dump.c: In function 'dump_bfd_file':
../bfd/bfd.h:302:108: error: right-hand operand of comma expression has no effect [-Werror=unused-value]
#define bfd_set_section_vma(bfd, ptr, val) (((ptr)->vma = (ptr)->lma = (val)), ((ptr)->user_set_vma = TRUE), TRUE)
^
../../gdb/cli/cli-dump.c:197:3: note: in expansion of macro 'bfd_set_section_vma'
bfd_set_section_vma (obfd, osection, vaddr);
^
../bfd/bfd.h:303:83: error: right-hand operand of comma expression has no effect [-Werror=unused-value]
#define bfd_set_section_alignment(bfd, ptr, val) (((ptr)->alignment_power = (val)),TRUE)
^
../../gdb/cli/cli-dump.c:198:3: note: in expansion of macro 'bfd_set_section_alignment'
bfd_set_section_alignment (obfd, osection, 0);
They have been fixed by the following commit:
commit 27b829ee701e29804216b3803fbaeb629be27491
Author: Nick Clifton <nickc@redhat.com>
Date: Wed Jan 29 13:46:39 2014 +0000
So I am proposing that we backport this commit to the 7.7 branch. I can
do that if it is OK.
WDYT? Thanks,
--
Sergio
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread* Re: [7.7.1] Blocker patch (GCC 4.9 compat) 2014-04-24 22:39 [7.7.1] Blocker patch (GCC 4.9 compat) Sergio Durigan Junior @ 2014-04-24 22:48 ` Joel Brobecker 2014-04-24 23:20 ` Sergio Durigan Junior 0 siblings, 1 reply; 3+ messages in thread From: Joel Brobecker @ 2014-04-24 22:48 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Sergio Durigan Junior; +Cc: GDB Patches > They have been fixed by the following commit: > > commit 27b829ee701e29804216b3803fbaeb629be27491 > Author: Nick Clifton <nickc@redhat.com> > Date: Wed Jan 29 13:46:39 2014 +0000 > > So I am proposing that we backport this commit to the 7.7 branch. I can > do that if it is OK. > > WDYT? Thanks, Yes, that sounds like a good plan to me. Thanks! -- Joel ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread
* Re: [7.7.1] Blocker patch (GCC 4.9 compat) 2014-04-24 22:48 ` Joel Brobecker @ 2014-04-24 23:20 ` Sergio Durigan Junior 0 siblings, 0 replies; 3+ messages in thread From: Sergio Durigan Junior @ 2014-04-24 23:20 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Joel Brobecker; +Cc: GDB Patches On Thursday, April 24 2014, Joel Brobecker wrote: >> They have been fixed by the following commit: >> >> commit 27b829ee701e29804216b3803fbaeb629be27491 >> Author: Nick Clifton <nickc@redhat.com> >> Date: Wed Jan 29 13:46:39 2014 +0000 >> >> So I am proposing that we backport this commit to the 7.7 branch. I can >> do that if it is OK. >> >> WDYT? Thanks, > > Yes, that sounds like a good plan to me. Thanks, Joel. The patch has been pushed: <https://sourceware.org/git/gitweb.cgi?p=binutils-gdb.git;h=8a90a4ef6a9c5acb6fd363c7c556682578aa9254> I have also created a bug for it: <https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=16873> And updated the wiki accordingly. Thanks! -- Sergio ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2014-04-24 23:20 UTC | newest] Thread overview: 3+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed) -- links below jump to the message on this page -- 2014-04-24 22:39 [7.7.1] Blocker patch (GCC 4.9 compat) Sergio Durigan Junior 2014-04-24 22:48 ` Joel Brobecker 2014-04-24 23:20 ` Sergio Durigan Junior
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox