* [7.7.1] Blocker patch (GCC 4.9 compat)
@ 2014-04-24 22:39 Sergio Durigan Junior
2014-04-24 22:48 ` Joel Brobecker
0 siblings, 1 reply; 3+ messages in thread
From: Sergio Durigan Junior @ 2014-04-24 22:39 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Joel Brobecker; +Cc: GDB Patches
Hi Joel,
I tested the GDB 7.7 branch using GCC 4.9 to build it, and found some
errors.
In file included from ../../gdb/defs.h:104:0,
from ../../gdb/cli/cli-dump.c:22:
../../gdb/cli/cli-dump.c: In function 'dump_bfd_file':
../bfd/bfd.h:302:108: error: right-hand operand of comma expression has no effect [-Werror=unused-value]
#define bfd_set_section_vma(bfd, ptr, val) (((ptr)->vma = (ptr)->lma = (val)), ((ptr)->user_set_vma = TRUE), TRUE)
^
../../gdb/cli/cli-dump.c:197:3: note: in expansion of macro 'bfd_set_section_vma'
bfd_set_section_vma (obfd, osection, vaddr);
^
../bfd/bfd.h:303:83: error: right-hand operand of comma expression has no effect [-Werror=unused-value]
#define bfd_set_section_alignment(bfd, ptr, val) (((ptr)->alignment_power = (val)),TRUE)
^
../../gdb/cli/cli-dump.c:198:3: note: in expansion of macro 'bfd_set_section_alignment'
bfd_set_section_alignment (obfd, osection, 0);
They have been fixed by the following commit:
commit 27b829ee701e29804216b3803fbaeb629be27491
Author: Nick Clifton <nickc@redhat.com>
Date: Wed Jan 29 13:46:39 2014 +0000
So I am proposing that we backport this commit to the 7.7 branch. I can
do that if it is OK.
WDYT? Thanks,
--
Sergio
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread
* Re: [7.7.1] Blocker patch (GCC 4.9 compat)
2014-04-24 22:39 [7.7.1] Blocker patch (GCC 4.9 compat) Sergio Durigan Junior
@ 2014-04-24 22:48 ` Joel Brobecker
2014-04-24 23:20 ` Sergio Durigan Junior
0 siblings, 1 reply; 3+ messages in thread
From: Joel Brobecker @ 2014-04-24 22:48 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Sergio Durigan Junior; +Cc: GDB Patches
> They have been fixed by the following commit:
>
> commit 27b829ee701e29804216b3803fbaeb629be27491
> Author: Nick Clifton <nickc@redhat.com>
> Date: Wed Jan 29 13:46:39 2014 +0000
>
> So I am proposing that we backport this commit to the 7.7 branch. I can
> do that if it is OK.
>
> WDYT? Thanks,
Yes, that sounds like a good plan to me.
Thanks!
--
Joel
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread
* Re: [7.7.1] Blocker patch (GCC 4.9 compat)
2014-04-24 22:48 ` Joel Brobecker
@ 2014-04-24 23:20 ` Sergio Durigan Junior
0 siblings, 0 replies; 3+ messages in thread
From: Sergio Durigan Junior @ 2014-04-24 23:20 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Joel Brobecker; +Cc: GDB Patches
On Thursday, April 24 2014, Joel Brobecker wrote:
>> They have been fixed by the following commit:
>>
>> commit 27b829ee701e29804216b3803fbaeb629be27491
>> Author: Nick Clifton <nickc@redhat.com>
>> Date: Wed Jan 29 13:46:39 2014 +0000
>>
>> So I am proposing that we backport this commit to the 7.7 branch. I can
>> do that if it is OK.
>>
>> WDYT? Thanks,
>
> Yes, that sounds like a good plan to me.
Thanks, Joel.
The patch has been pushed:
<https://sourceware.org/git/gitweb.cgi?p=binutils-gdb.git;h=8a90a4ef6a9c5acb6fd363c7c556682578aa9254>
I have also created a bug for it:
<https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=16873>
And updated the wiki accordingly.
Thanks!
--
Sergio
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2014-04-24 23:20 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2014-04-24 22:39 [7.7.1] Blocker patch (GCC 4.9 compat) Sergio Durigan Junior
2014-04-24 22:48 ` Joel Brobecker
2014-04-24 23:20 ` Sergio Durigan Junior
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox