From: Tom Tromey <tromey@redhat.com>
To: Doug Evans <dje@google.com>
Cc: Jan Kratochvil <jan.kratochvil@redhat.com>, gdb-patches@sourceware.org
Subject: Re: RFA: implement ambiguous linespec proposal
Date: Wed, 16 Nov 2011 14:49:00 -0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <m3sjlojf71.fsf@fleche.redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CADPb22Qw2M6S-N_qL5Ngupy2sCieyksPBL1wLLbYefrk8Kt26Q@mail.gmail.com> (Doug Evans's message of "Tue, 15 Nov 2011 20:57:22 -0800")
>>>>> "Doug" == Doug Evans <dje@google.com> writes:
Doug> Single vs double quote handling in linespecs is, umm, odd.
Doug> [It's probably seems odder than it really is due to poor naming,
Doug> "quote" is just too ambiguous. At some point I'd like to enforce
Doug> "squote" and "dquote" instead of just "quote" when only one is meant.
Doug> :-)]
Keith is working on this. He's replacing the current distributed, ad
hoc lexing code in linespec.c with something more centralized and
uniform. This should let us more easily add new kinds of linespecs,
like "FILE:FUNCTION:LINE" or "OBJFILE:FILE:FUNCTION" without making all
the code even more horrible.
I don't have insight into the specific case of different quoting styles.
You can see Keith's work-in-progress on archer-keiths-linespec-parser.
Tom
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2011-11-16 14:49 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 42+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2011-10-28 17:34 Tom Tromey
2011-10-28 20:52 ` Matt Rice
2011-11-01 20:38 ` Tom Tromey
2011-10-28 22:41 ` Jan Kratochvil
2011-11-01 20:58 ` Tom Tromey
2011-11-03 20:49 ` Tom Tromey
2011-11-04 7:46 ` Jan Kratochvil
2011-11-08 16:36 ` Tom Tromey
2011-11-09 16:05 ` Joel Brobecker
2011-11-09 17:12 ` Tom Tromey
2011-11-09 17:56 ` Joel Brobecker
2011-11-09 18:19 ` Tom Tromey
2011-11-09 19:00 ` Joel Brobecker
2011-11-14 21:04 ` Tom Tromey
2011-11-14 21:32 ` Jerome Guitton
2011-11-09 18:37 ` Tom Tromey
2011-11-14 21:11 ` Tom Tromey
2011-11-15 16:30 ` Tom Tromey
2011-11-15 16:59 ` Pierre Muller
2011-11-16 0:09 ` Jan Kratochvil
2011-11-16 1:58 ` Joel Brobecker
2011-11-16 14:46 ` Tom Tromey
2011-11-18 14:10 ` Tom Tromey
2011-11-16 21:23 ` Stan Shebs
2011-11-16 2:28 ` Yao Qi
2011-11-16 3:20 ` Doug Evans
2011-11-16 14:46 ` Tom Tromey
2011-11-16 16:06 ` Tom Tromey
2011-11-16 4:57 ` Doug Evans
2011-11-16 5:22 ` Doug Evans
2011-11-16 14:54 ` Tom Tromey
2011-11-16 16:32 ` Doug Evans
2011-11-16 16:39 ` Tom Tromey
2011-11-16 14:49 ` Tom Tromey [this message]
2011-11-16 8:15 ` Yao Qi
2011-11-16 16:17 ` Tom Tromey
2011-11-16 15:43 ` Yao Qi
2011-11-16 16:11 ` Tom Tromey
2011-11-16 16:44 ` Tom Tromey
2011-11-17 3:49 ` Yao Qi
2011-11-21 21:50 ` Tom Tromey
2011-11-23 21:33 ` Tom Tromey
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=m3sjlojf71.fsf@fleche.redhat.com \
--to=tromey@redhat.com \
--cc=dje@google.com \
--cc=gdb-patches@sourceware.org \
--cc=jan.kratochvil@redhat.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox