From: Yao Qi <yao@codesourcery.com>
To: Tom Tromey <tromey@redhat.com>
Cc: Jan Kratochvil <jan.kratochvil@redhat.com>, gdb-patches@sourceware.org
Subject: Re: RFA: implement ambiguous linespec proposal
Date: Thu, 17 Nov 2011 03:49:00 -0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <4EC48425.2040407@codesourcery.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <m3r518hvac.fsf@fleche.redhat.com>
On 11/17/2011 12:44 AM, Tom Tromey wrote:
> Yao> I'll debug this problem tomorrow, but if you have any clues, that will
> Yao> be helpful.
>
> Tom> What is mysterious is that I do not see this failure.
> Tom> I actually think this test should fail, because it is applying a
> Tom> condition in a scope where there is no variable 'a'.
>
> Tom> I will debug it today.
>
> Ok, I found the problem. "a" is defined in a system library for which I
> have debuginfo installed:
>
> (top-gdb) p *sym.symtab
OOC, could you give me a stack backtrace here?
> $22 = {
> [...]
> filename = 0x26ba950 "../sysdeps/ieee754/dbl-64/atnat.h",
> dirname = 0x26c4f10 "/usr/src/debug/glibc-2.14-34-ge2a3090/math",
>
> So the condition erroneously parses.
>
That is great!
> Changing the names to "a_param" instead makes it fail again.
>
> I think the test is bogus, though, so I changed it in a way that will
> make it succeed.
>
Agreed.
> I can send a new revision of everything if you want.
No, I don't.
--
Yao (é½å°§)
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2011-11-17 3:49 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 42+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2011-10-28 17:34 Tom Tromey
2011-10-28 20:52 ` Matt Rice
2011-11-01 20:38 ` Tom Tromey
2011-10-28 22:41 ` Jan Kratochvil
2011-11-01 20:58 ` Tom Tromey
2011-11-03 20:49 ` Tom Tromey
2011-11-04 7:46 ` Jan Kratochvil
2011-11-08 16:36 ` Tom Tromey
2011-11-09 16:05 ` Joel Brobecker
2011-11-09 17:12 ` Tom Tromey
2011-11-09 17:56 ` Joel Brobecker
2011-11-09 18:19 ` Tom Tromey
2011-11-09 19:00 ` Joel Brobecker
2011-11-14 21:04 ` Tom Tromey
2011-11-14 21:32 ` Jerome Guitton
2011-11-09 18:37 ` Tom Tromey
2011-11-14 21:11 ` Tom Tromey
2011-11-15 16:30 ` Tom Tromey
2011-11-15 16:59 ` Pierre Muller
2011-11-16 0:09 ` Jan Kratochvil
2011-11-16 1:58 ` Joel Brobecker
2011-11-16 14:46 ` Tom Tromey
2011-11-18 14:10 ` Tom Tromey
2011-11-16 21:23 ` Stan Shebs
2011-11-16 2:28 ` Yao Qi
2011-11-16 3:20 ` Doug Evans
2011-11-16 14:46 ` Tom Tromey
2011-11-16 16:06 ` Tom Tromey
2011-11-16 4:57 ` Doug Evans
2011-11-16 5:22 ` Doug Evans
2011-11-16 14:54 ` Tom Tromey
2011-11-16 16:32 ` Doug Evans
2011-11-16 16:39 ` Tom Tromey
2011-11-16 14:49 ` Tom Tromey
2011-11-16 8:15 ` Yao Qi
2011-11-16 16:17 ` Tom Tromey
2011-11-16 15:43 ` Yao Qi
2011-11-16 16:11 ` Tom Tromey
2011-11-16 16:44 ` Tom Tromey
2011-11-17 3:49 ` Yao Qi [this message]
2011-11-21 21:50 ` Tom Tromey
2011-11-23 21:33 ` Tom Tromey
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=4EC48425.2040407@codesourcery.com \
--to=yao@codesourcery.com \
--cc=gdb-patches@sourceware.org \
--cc=jan.kratochvil@redhat.com \
--cc=tromey@redhat.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox