From: Tom Tromey <tromey@redhat.com>
To: Nick Roberts <nickrob@snap.net.nz>
Cc: gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com
Subject: Re: RFA: Patch: annotations -vs- deprecated hooks
Date: Mon, 14 Jul 2008 00:50:00 -0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <m3k5fp9tnc.fsf@fleche.redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <18554.39826.254742.402462@kahikatea.snap.net.nz> (Nick Roberts's message of "Mon\, 14 Jul 2008 12\:19\:30 +1200")
>>>>> "Nick" == Nick Roberts <nickrob@snap.net.nz> writes:
>> Is it just annotations that you care about, or all the deprecated hook
>> stuff? I think it all falls into the category of not-broken.
Nick> Emacs still uses annotations and it seems to work OK. Your
Nick> earlier change, emoving event hooks, removes a significant
Nick> amount of code and stops others from using them in the future.
I think this change is worthwhile as a cleanup. It removes some
more deprecated things, preventing use of them.
When browsing gdb, I find it very strange to see how many things are
marked deprecated, and for how long. E.g.,
deprecated_annotate_starting_hook is not set anywhere in gdb, but has
been deprecated since 2004. That seems like an inordinately long
deprecation for something which is unused.
Nick> This patch, however, while probably safe (I've not checked)
Nick> doesn't seem worthwhile to me since this code _will_ disappear
Nick> in the future anyway.
Do you know when this will be? If it is soon, then I don't mind
holding off. If it will be a year, or years, then I think it would be
strange to reject a cleanup in favor of some distant, unwritten patch.
Tom
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2008-07-14 0:50 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 13+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2008-07-13 21:59 Tom Tromey
2008-07-13 22:26 ` Nick Roberts
2008-07-13 23:15 ` Tom Tromey
2008-07-14 0:20 ` Nick Roberts
2008-07-14 0:50 ` Tom Tromey [this message]
2008-07-14 0:57 ` Daniel Jacobowitz
2008-07-14 1:37 ` Nick Roberts
2008-07-14 15:22 ` Tom Tromey
2008-07-14 5:00 ` Joel Brobecker
2008-07-14 17:27 ` Joel Brobecker
2008-07-14 17:46 ` Tom Tromey
2008-07-16 12:42 ` Nick Roberts
2008-07-28 17:50 ` Tom Tromey
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=m3k5fp9tnc.fsf@fleche.redhat.com \
--to=tromey@redhat.com \
--cc=gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com \
--cc=nickrob@snap.net.nz \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox