From: Tom Tromey <tromey@redhat.com>
To: Stan Shebs <stan@codesourcery.com>
Cc: gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com
Subject: Re: Subdir ChangeLogs
Date: Fri, 01 Aug 2008 17:10:00 -0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <m3hca4zmo9.fsf@fleche.redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <48933ABA.2030601@codesourcery.com> (Stan Shebs's message of "Fri\, 01 Aug 2008 09\:32\:58 -0700")
>>>>> "Stan" == Stan Shebs <stan@codesourcery.com> writes:
Tom> Any comment on this?
Stan> I thought I did...
Oops, sorry Stan.
Tom> The concrete proposal is:
Tom> * Rename gdb/doc/ChangeLog -> gdb/doc/ChangeLog.old
Stan> Yes.
Is that an official ok? Or just agreement?
Tom> * Rename gdb/testsuite/ChangeLog -> gdb/testsuite/ChangeLog.old
Stan> I don't like this idea so much. Partly because testsuite is a whole
Stan> complex of subdirs, partly because I still think of testsuite as a
Stan> separate "product" even though it hasn't been packaged separately in
Stan> years, but basically a non-rational reaction. But if everybody else
Stan> wants this, that's fine.
If it helps any, Classpath has many more directories than
gdb/testsuite, and a single ChangeLog works just fine there. It is
actually clearer this way, IMO, since related changes are grouped
together.
Tom
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2008-08-01 17:10 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 29+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2008-07-13 0:16 RFA: Remove gdb-events Tom Tromey
2008-07-13 3:26 ` Stan Shebs
2008-07-13 21:56 ` Tom Tromey
2008-08-01 16:20 ` Tom Tromey
2008-08-01 16:33 ` Subdir ChangeLogs (was Re: RFA: Remove gdb-events) Stan Shebs
2008-08-01 17:10 ` Tom Tromey [this message]
2008-08-01 17:27 ` Subdir ChangeLogs Stan Shebs
2008-08-01 17:54 ` Tom Tromey
2008-08-01 18:44 ` Eli Zaretskii
2008-08-01 18:55 ` Tom Tromey
2008-08-01 19:25 ` Eli Zaretskii
2008-08-01 19:33 ` Tom Tromey
2008-08-01 20:11 ` Thiago Jung Bauermann
2008-08-02 7:13 ` Eli Zaretskii
2008-08-02 16:52 ` Tom Tromey
2008-08-02 17:28 ` Eli Zaretskii
2008-08-02 20:24 ` Thiago Jung Bauermann
2008-08-03 0:02 ` Michael Snyder
2008-08-01 17:40 ` RFA: Remove gdb-events Mark Kettenis
2008-07-14 17:10 ` Joel Brobecker
2008-07-14 20:33 ` Tom Tromey
2008-07-15 6:54 ` Joel Brobecker
2008-07-17 23:41 ` Tom Tromey
2008-07-21 16:54 ` GDB/MI PING (was: "Re: RFA: Remove gdb-events") Joel Brobecker
2008-07-22 0:56 ` RFA: Remove gdb-events Tom Tromey
2008-07-25 16:11 ` Tom Tromey
2008-07-20 11:46 ` Eli Zaretskii
2008-07-21 17:13 ` Vladimir Prus
2008-07-22 0:32 ` Tom Tromey
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=m3hca4zmo9.fsf@fleche.redhat.com \
--to=tromey@redhat.com \
--cc=gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com \
--cc=stan@codesourcery.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox