From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 18401 invoked by alias); 1 Aug 2008 17:10:36 -0000 Received: (qmail 18393 invoked by uid 22791); 1 Aug 2008 17:10:35 -0000 X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from mx1.redhat.com (HELO mx1.redhat.com) (66.187.233.31) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.31) with ESMTP; Fri, 01 Aug 2008 17:10:18 +0000 Received: from int-mx1.corp.redhat.com (int-mx1.corp.redhat.com [172.16.52.254]) by mx1.redhat.com (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id m71HAGTP022427 for ; Fri, 1 Aug 2008 13:10:16 -0400 Received: from pobox.corp.redhat.com (pobox.corp.redhat.com [10.11.255.20]) by int-mx1.corp.redhat.com (8.13.1/8.13.1) with ESMTP id m71HAFXN032718; Fri, 1 Aug 2008 13:10:15 -0400 Received: from opsy.redhat.com (vpn-10-95.bos.redhat.com [10.16.10.95]) by pobox.corp.redhat.com (8.13.1/8.13.1) with ESMTP id m71HAFKH008562; Fri, 1 Aug 2008 13:10:15 -0400 Received: by opsy.redhat.com (Postfix, from userid 500) id 9EDF78880A6; Fri, 1 Aug 2008 11:10:14 -0600 (MDT) To: Stan Shebs Cc: gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com Subject: Re: Subdir ChangeLogs References: <487975AF.4030306@codesourcery.com> <48933ABA.2030601@codesourcery.com> From: Tom Tromey Reply-To: Tom Tromey X-Attribution: Tom Date: Fri, 01 Aug 2008 17:10:00 -0000 In-Reply-To: <48933ABA.2030601@codesourcery.com> (Stan Shebs's message of "Fri\, 01 Aug 2008 09\:32\:58 -0700") Message-ID: User-Agent: Gnus/5.11 (Gnus v5.11) Emacs/22.1 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sourceware.org X-SW-Source: 2008-08/txt/msg00009.txt.bz2 >>>>> "Stan" == Stan Shebs writes: Tom> Any comment on this? Stan> I thought I did... Oops, sorry Stan. Tom> The concrete proposal is: Tom> * Rename gdb/doc/ChangeLog -> gdb/doc/ChangeLog.old Stan> Yes. Is that an official ok? Or just agreement? Tom> * Rename gdb/testsuite/ChangeLog -> gdb/testsuite/ChangeLog.old Stan> I don't like this idea so much. Partly because testsuite is a whole Stan> complex of subdirs, partly because I still think of testsuite as a Stan> separate "product" even though it hasn't been packaged separately in Stan> years, but basically a non-rational reaction. But if everybody else Stan> wants this, that's fine. If it helps any, Classpath has many more directories than gdb/testsuite, and a single ChangeLog works just fine there. It is actually clearer this way, IMO, since related changes are grouped together. Tom