From: Tom Tromey <tromey@redhat.com>
To: Stan Shebs <stan@codesourcery.com>
Cc: gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com
Subject: Re: RFA: Remove gdb-events
Date: Sun, 13 Jul 2008 21:56:00 -0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <m3abglbg8y.fsf@fleche.redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <487975AF.4030306@codesourcery.com> (Stan Shebs's message of "Sat\, 12 Jul 2008 20\:25\:35 -0700")
>>>>> "Stan" == Stan Shebs <stan@codesourcery.com> writes:
Tom> BTW, why is there a separate doc/ChangeLog? I don't think it adds
Tom> much value; in fact it partly hides the way that code and
Tom> documentation change may be tied. The same applies to
Tom> testsuite/ChangeLog.
Stan> doc/ChangeLog is purely inertia; I would be fine with merging it up in
Stan> some way.
Stan> testsuite/ChangeLog, both here and in many other components, is an
Stan> artifact of the old habit of packaging testsuites separately.
FWIW -- in libjava we did this for a while, inheriting the old Cygnus
tradition. But, it was just more work for no good reason. So, we
just renamed the testsuite ChangeLog to ChangeLog.old and moved on.
I'd like to propose changing this for gdb. I don't think merging is
even needed. Folks can always look in subdir ChangeLog.old...
Tom
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2008-07-13 21:56 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 29+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2008-07-13 0:16 Tom Tromey
2008-07-13 3:26 ` Stan Shebs
2008-07-13 21:56 ` Tom Tromey [this message]
2008-08-01 16:20 ` Tom Tromey
2008-08-01 16:33 ` Subdir ChangeLogs (was Re: RFA: Remove gdb-events) Stan Shebs
2008-08-01 17:10 ` Subdir ChangeLogs Tom Tromey
2008-08-01 17:27 ` Stan Shebs
2008-08-01 17:54 ` Tom Tromey
2008-08-01 18:44 ` Eli Zaretskii
2008-08-01 18:55 ` Tom Tromey
2008-08-01 19:25 ` Eli Zaretskii
2008-08-01 19:33 ` Tom Tromey
2008-08-01 20:11 ` Thiago Jung Bauermann
2008-08-02 7:13 ` Eli Zaretskii
2008-08-02 16:52 ` Tom Tromey
2008-08-02 17:28 ` Eli Zaretskii
2008-08-02 20:24 ` Thiago Jung Bauermann
2008-08-03 0:02 ` Michael Snyder
2008-08-01 17:40 ` RFA: Remove gdb-events Mark Kettenis
2008-07-14 17:10 ` Joel Brobecker
2008-07-14 20:33 ` Tom Tromey
2008-07-15 6:54 ` Joel Brobecker
2008-07-17 23:41 ` Tom Tromey
2008-07-21 16:54 ` GDB/MI PING (was: "Re: RFA: Remove gdb-events") Joel Brobecker
2008-07-22 0:56 ` RFA: Remove gdb-events Tom Tromey
2008-07-25 16:11 ` Tom Tromey
2008-07-20 11:46 ` Eli Zaretskii
2008-07-21 17:13 ` Vladimir Prus
2008-07-22 0:32 ` Tom Tromey
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=m3abglbg8y.fsf@fleche.redhat.com \
--to=tromey@redhat.com \
--cc=gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com \
--cc=stan@codesourcery.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox