From: Sergio Durigan Junior <sergiodj@redhat.com>
To: gdb-patches@sourceware.org
Subject: [PATCH 3/4 v2] Use longjmp and exception probes when available
Date: Fri, 06 Apr 2012 04:11:00 -0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <m37gxtwmyv.fsf@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <m3k41twnd4.fsf@redhat.com> (Sergio Durigan Junior's message of "Fri, 06 Apr 2012 00:27:51 -0300")
Hi,
Just like the patch #1, this patch also didn't change from the last
version, which can be found here:
http://sourceware.org/ml/gdb-patches/2012-03/msg00356.html
OK to check-in?
gdb/ChangeLog
2012-07-04 Sergio Durigan Junior <sergiodj@redhat.com>
Tom Tromey <tromey@redhat.com>
* breakpoint.c (struct breakpoint_objfile_data)
<longjmp_searched>,<longjmp_probes>,<exception_searched>,
<exception_probes>: New fields.
(free_breakpoint_probes): New function.
(create_longjmp_master_breakpoint): Prefer SystemTap probe over
`_Unwind_DebugHook'.
(create_exception_master_breakpoint): Likewise.
(_initialize_breakpoint): Registering cleanup for SystemTap probes.
* infrun.c: Including necessary header files for handling SystemTap
probes.
(handle_inferior_event): Handling longjmp breakpoint and exceptions
via SystemTap probes.
(check_exception_resume): Remove `func' argument. Handle exception
unwinding breakpoint set via a SystemTap probe.
(insert_exception_resume_from_probe): New function.
---
gdb/breakpoint.c | 89 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-
gdb/infrun.c | 77 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-------
2 files changed, 154 insertions(+), 12 deletions(-)
diff --git a/gdb/breakpoint.c b/gdb/breakpoint.c
index 43d5b29..51c4295 100644
--- a/gdb/breakpoint.c
+++ b/gdb/breakpoint.c
@@ -2740,11 +2740,23 @@ struct breakpoint_objfile_data
/* Minimal symbol(s) for "longjmp", "siglongjmp", etc. (if any). */
struct minimal_symbol *longjmp_msym[NUM_LONGJMP_NAMES];
+ /* True if we have looked for longjmp probes. */
+ int longjmp_searched;
+
+ /* SystemTap probe points for longjmp (if any). */
+ VEC (stap_probe_p) *longjmp_probes;
+
/* Minimal symbol for "std::terminate()" (if any). */
struct minimal_symbol *terminate_msym;
/* Minimal symbol for "_Unwind_DebugHook" (if any). */
struct minimal_symbol *exception_msym;
+
+ /* True if we have looked for exception probes. */
+ int exception_searched;
+
+ /* SystemTap probe points for unwinding (if any). */
+ VEC (stap_probe_p) *exception_probes;
};
static const struct objfile_data *breakpoint_objfile_key;
@@ -2781,6 +2793,15 @@ get_breakpoint_objfile_data (struct objfile *objfile)
}
static void
+free_breakpoint_probes (struct objfile *obj, void *data)
+{
+ struct breakpoint_objfile_data *bp_objfile_data = data;
+
+ VEC_free (stap_probe_p, bp_objfile_data->longjmp_probes);
+ VEC_free (stap_probe_p, bp_objfile_data->exception_probes);
+}
+
+static void
create_overlay_event_breakpoint (void)
{
struct objfile *objfile;
@@ -2857,6 +2878,37 @@ create_longjmp_master_breakpoint (void)
bp_objfile_data = get_breakpoint_objfile_data (objfile);
+ if (!bp_objfile_data->longjmp_searched)
+ {
+ bp_objfile_data->longjmp_probes
+ = find_probes_in_objfile (objfile, "libc", "longjmp");
+ bp_objfile_data->longjmp_searched = 1;
+ }
+
+ if (bp_objfile_data->longjmp_probes != NULL)
+ {
+ int i;
+ struct stap_probe *probe;
+ struct gdbarch *gdbarch = get_objfile_arch (objfile);
+
+ for (i = 0;
+ VEC_iterate (stap_probe_p,
+ bp_objfile_data->longjmp_probes,
+ i, probe);
+ ++i)
+ {
+ struct breakpoint *b;
+
+ b = create_internal_breakpoint (gdbarch, probe->address,
+ bp_longjmp_master,
+ &internal_breakpoint_ops);
+ b->addr_string = xstrdup ("-p libc:longjmp");
+ b->enable_state = bp_disabled;
+ }
+
+ continue;
+ }
+
for (i = 0; i < NUM_LONGJMP_NAMES; i++)
{
struct breakpoint *b;
@@ -2967,6 +3019,40 @@ create_exception_master_breakpoint (void)
bp_objfile_data = get_breakpoint_objfile_data (objfile);
+ /* We prefer the SystemTap probe point if it exists. */
+ if (!bp_objfile_data->exception_searched)
+ {
+ bp_objfile_data->exception_probes
+ = find_probes_in_objfile (objfile, "libgcc", "unwind");
+ bp_objfile_data->exception_searched = 1;
+ }
+
+ if (bp_objfile_data->exception_probes != NULL)
+ {
+ struct gdbarch *gdbarch = get_objfile_arch (objfile);
+ int i;
+ struct stap_probe *probe;
+
+ for (i = 0;
+ VEC_iterate (stap_probe_p,
+ bp_objfile_data->exception_probes,
+ i, probe);
+ ++i)
+ {
+ struct breakpoint *b;
+
+ b = create_internal_breakpoint (gdbarch, probe->address,
+ bp_exception_master,
+ &internal_breakpoint_ops);
+ b->addr_string = xstrdup ("-p libgcc:unwind");
+ b->enable_state = bp_disabled;
+ }
+
+ continue;
+ }
+
+ /* Otherwise, try the hook function. */
+
if (msym_not_found_p (bp_objfile_data->exception_msym))
continue;
@@ -15121,7 +15207,8 @@ _initialize_breakpoint (void)
observer_attach_inferior_exit (clear_syscall_counts);
observer_attach_memory_changed (invalidate_bp_value_on_memory_change);
- breakpoint_objfile_key = register_objfile_data ();
+ breakpoint_objfile_key
+ = register_objfile_data_with_cleanup (NULL, free_breakpoint_probes);
catch_syscall_inferior_data
= register_inferior_data_with_cleanup (catch_syscall_inferior_data_cleanup);
diff --git a/gdb/infrun.c b/gdb/infrun.c
index 54e39ef..d9bd886 100644
--- a/gdb/infrun.c
+++ b/gdb/infrun.c
@@ -55,6 +55,8 @@
#include "continuations.h"
#include "interps.h"
#include "skip.h"
+#include "stap-probe.h"
+#include "objfiles.h"
/* Prototypes for local functions */
@@ -2392,7 +2394,7 @@ static void handle_step_into_function (struct gdbarch *gdbarch,
static void handle_step_into_function_backward (struct gdbarch *gdbarch,
struct execution_control_state *ecs);
static void check_exception_resume (struct execution_control_state *,
- struct frame_info *, struct symbol *);
+ struct frame_info *);
static void stop_stepping (struct execution_control_state *ecs);
static void prepare_to_wait (struct execution_control_state *ecs);
@@ -4427,9 +4429,17 @@ process_event_stop_test:
if (what.is_longjmp)
{
- if (!gdbarch_get_longjmp_target_p (gdbarch)
- || !gdbarch_get_longjmp_target (gdbarch,
- frame, &jmp_buf_pc))
+ struct value *arg_value;
+
+ /* If we set the longjmp breakpoint via a SystemTap probe,
+ then use it to extract the arguments. The destination
+ PC is the third argument to the probe. */
+ arg_value = stap_safe_evaluate_at_pc (frame, 2);
+ if (arg_value)
+ jmp_buf_pc = value_as_address (arg_value);
+ else if (!gdbarch_get_longjmp_target_p (gdbarch)
+ || !gdbarch_get_longjmp_target (gdbarch,
+ frame, &jmp_buf_pc))
{
if (debug_infrun)
fprintf_unfiltered (gdb_stdlog,
@@ -4447,12 +4457,7 @@ process_event_stop_test:
insert_longjmp_resume_breakpoint (gdbarch, jmp_buf_pc);
}
else
- {
- struct symbol *func = get_frame_function (frame);
-
- if (func)
- check_exception_resume (ecs, frame, func);
- }
+ check_exception_resume (ecs, frame);
keep_going (ecs);
return;
@@ -5539,15 +5544,65 @@ insert_exception_resume_breakpoint (struct thread_info *tp,
}
}
+/* A helper for check_exception_resume that sets an
+ exception-breakpoint based on a SystemTap probe. */
+
+static void
+insert_exception_resume_from_probe (struct thread_info *tp,
+ const struct stap_probe *probe,
+ struct objfile *objfile,
+ struct frame_info *frame)
+{
+ struct value *arg_value;
+ CORE_ADDR handler;
+ struct breakpoint *bp;
+
+ arg_value = stap_safe_evaluate_at_pc (frame, 1);
+ if (!arg_value)
+ return;
+
+ handler = value_as_address (arg_value);
+
+ if (debug_infrun)
+ fprintf_unfiltered (gdb_stdlog,
+ "infrun: exception resume at %s\n",
+ paddress (get_objfile_arch (objfile),
+ handler));
+
+ bp = set_momentary_breakpoint_at_pc (get_frame_arch (frame),
+ handler, bp_exception_resume);
+ bp->thread = tp->num;
+ inferior_thread ()->control.exception_resume_breakpoint = bp;
+}
+
/* This is called when an exception has been intercepted. Check to
see whether the exception's destination is of interest, and if so,
set an exception resume breakpoint there. */
static void
check_exception_resume (struct execution_control_state *ecs,
- struct frame_info *frame, struct symbol *func)
+ struct frame_info *frame)
{
volatile struct gdb_exception e;
+ struct objfile *objfile;
+ const struct stap_probe *probe;
+ struct symbol *func;
+
+ /* First see if this exception unwinding breakpoint was set via a
+ SystemTap probe point. If so, the probe has two arguments: the
+ CFA and the HANDLER. We ignore the CFA, extract the handler, and
+ set a breakpoint there. */
+ probe = find_probe_by_pc (get_frame_pc (frame), &objfile);
+ if (probe)
+ {
+ insert_exception_resume_from_probe (ecs->event_thread, probe,
+ objfile, frame);
+ return;
+ }
+
+ func = get_frame_function (frame);
+ if (!func)
+ return;
TRY_CATCH (e, RETURN_MASK_ERROR)
{
--
1.7.7.6
--
Sergio
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2012-04-06 4:11 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 83+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2012-04-06 3:28 [PATCH 0/4 v2] Implement support for SystemTap probes on userspace Sergio Durigan Junior
2012-04-06 3:32 ` [PATCH 1/4 v2] Refactor internal variable mechanism Sergio Durigan Junior
2012-04-06 3:36 ` [PATCH 2/4 v2] Implement new features needed for handling SystemTap probes Sergio Durigan Junior
2012-04-11 19:06 ` Jan Kratochvil
2012-04-11 22:14 ` Sergio Durigan Junior
2012-04-11 23:33 ` Jan Kratochvil
2012-04-06 3:37 ` [PATCH 4/4 v2] Documentation and testsuite changes Sergio Durigan Junior
2012-04-06 9:27 ` Eli Zaretskii
2012-04-09 21:37 ` Sergio Durigan Junior
2012-04-06 4:11 ` Sergio Durigan Junior [this message]
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2011-10-26 21:08 [PATCH] Implement new `info core mappings' command Sergio Durigan Junior
2011-10-26 21:25 ` Sergio Durigan Junior
2011-10-27 7:30 ` Eli Zaretskii
2011-10-27 18:09 ` Sergio Durigan Junior
2011-10-29 19:48 ` Eli Zaretskii
2011-10-31 0:34 ` Jan Kratochvil
2011-10-31 7:00 ` Sergio Durigan Junior
2011-10-31 8:13 ` Jan Kratochvil
2011-10-31 12:57 ` Pedro Alves
2011-11-01 11:54 ` [patch] `info proc ' completion [Re: [PATCH] Implement new `info core mappings' command] Jan Kratochvil
2011-11-01 16:23 ` Eli Zaretskii
2011-11-03 14:12 ` [patch] `info proc *' help fix [Re: [patch] `info proc ' completion] Jan Kratochvil
2011-11-03 16:57 ` Eli Zaretskii
2011-11-03 17:07 ` Jan Kratochvil
2011-11-03 18:08 ` Eli Zaretskii
2011-11-03 18:25 ` Jan Kratochvil
2011-11-02 18:30 ` [patch] `info proc ' completion [Re: [PATCH] Implement new `info core mappings' command] Pedro Alves
2011-11-02 18:48 ` [commit] " Jan Kratochvil
2011-11-03 20:01 ` [PATCH] Implement new `info core mappings' command Sergio Durigan Junior
2011-11-04 10:38 ` Eli Zaretskii
2011-11-04 16:27 ` Jan Kratochvil
2011-11-08 1:49 ` Sergio Durigan Junior
2011-11-08 21:47 ` Jan Kratochvil
2011-11-09 20:32 ` Jan Kratochvil
2011-11-16 4:10 ` Sergio Durigan Junior
2011-11-21 16:15 ` Sergio Durigan Junior
2011-11-23 16:32 ` [rfc] Options for "info mappings" etc. (Re: [PATCH] Implement new `info core mappings' command) Ulrich Weigand
2011-11-23 23:37 ` Sergio Durigan Junior
2011-12-01 19:51 ` Ulrich Weigand
2011-12-05 12:59 ` Pedro Alves
2011-12-05 15:02 ` Ulrich Weigand
2011-12-06 16:01 ` Pedro Alves
2011-12-06 17:19 ` Ulrich Weigand
2011-12-07 16:29 ` Pedro Alves
2011-12-07 17:24 ` Pedro Alves
2011-12-07 20:14 ` Ulrich Weigand
2011-12-09 13:28 ` Pedro Alves
2011-12-09 14:10 ` Pedro Alves
2011-12-20 23:08 ` Ulrich Weigand
2011-12-21 22:36 ` Jan Kratochvil
2011-12-22 16:15 ` Ulrich Weigand
2012-01-05 16:02 ` Pedro Alves
2012-01-05 18:03 ` Ulrich Weigand
2012-01-05 18:20 ` Pedro Alves
2012-01-05 19:54 ` Ulrich Weigand
2012-01-06 6:41 ` Joel Brobecker
2012-01-06 12:29 ` Pedro Alves
2012-01-06 12:27 ` Pedro Alves
2012-01-09 15:44 ` Ulrich Weigand
2012-01-11 16:38 ` Pedro Alves
2012-01-11 18:32 ` Ulrich Weigand
2012-01-05 18:37 ` Mark Kettenis
2012-01-05 19:35 ` Ulrich Weigand
2011-04-04 3:09 [PATCH 4/6] Implement support for SystemTap probes Sergio Durigan Junior
2011-04-04 19:06 ` Eli Zaretskii
2011-04-06 20:20 ` Tom Tromey
2011-04-06 20:52 ` Sergio Durigan Junior
2011-04-07 2:41 ` Yao Qi
2011-04-07 3:32 ` Sergio Durigan Junior
2011-04-07 17:04 ` Tom Tromey
2011-04-11 3:21 ` Yao Qi
2011-04-08 12:38 ` Sergio Durigan Junior
2011-04-11 3:52 ` Yao Qi
2011-08-12 15:45 ` Jan Kratochvil
2011-08-12 17:22 ` Frank Ch. Eigler
2011-08-12 21:33 ` Sergio Durigan Junior
2011-04-19 16:42 ` Jan Kratochvil
2012-05-07 19:36 ` Jan Kratochvil
2012-05-07 19:54 ` Sergio Durigan Junior
2012-05-07 19:58 ` Jan Kratochvil
2012-05-07 20:26 ` Sergio Durigan Junior
2012-05-07 20:38 ` Jan Kratochvil
2012-05-08 1:36 ` Sergio Durigan Junior
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=m37gxtwmyv.fsf@redhat.com \
--to=sergiodj@redhat.com \
--cc=gdb-patches@sourceware.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox