From: Eli Zaretskii <eliz@gnu.org>
To: Sergio Durigan Junior <sergiodj@redhat.com>
Cc: gdb-patches@sourceware.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 4/4 v2] Documentation and testsuite changes
Date: Fri, 06 Apr 2012 09:27:00 -0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <83fwchb48p.fsf@gnu.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <m3398hwmxh.fsf@redhat.com>
> From: Sergio Durigan Junior <sergiodj@redhat.com>
> Date: Fri, 06 Apr 2012 00:37:14 -0300
>
> This last patch contains documentation and testsuite changes. I tried
> to address all comments that Eli has made in the first version, but I
> have to say that I could use another round of review from Eli and Tom.
Here's mine.
> +@cindex SystemTap static probe point
Although SystemTap is a proper name, I'd prefer for its index entries
to start with a lowercase letter, because otherwise an Info manual
built in some non-English locale could have the index entries sorted
in surprising ways, since the collation order of uppercase letters
differs from that in en_*.
If you think we must use "SystemTap" literally, how about moving words
around, as in
@cindex static probe point, SystemTap
> +@value{GDBN} supports @code{SDT} probes in the code. @code{SDT} stands
> +for Statically Defined Tracing, and the probes are designed to have a tiny
Since you are introducing a new term "SDT", the first time it is used
it should be in @dfn. Also, instead of @code{SDT}, I would use
@acronym{SDT} everywhere, as it really isn't a symbol in some program,
but an acronym.
> +runtime code and data footprint, and no dynamic relocations. They are
> +usable from assembly, C and C++ languages.
^^^
We use "C@t{++}" in the manual, it looks better in print.
> +@item info probes stap @r{[}@var{provider}@r{]} @r{[}@var{name}@r{]} @r{[}@var{objfile}@r{]}
I think the brackets should be nested, as you did in NEWS. I mean,
"name" can only be given if "provider" is given, and "objfile" can be
given only if the other tow are, right? So each one is not
independently optional.
> +If given, @var{provider} is a regular expression used to select which
> +providers to list. ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
"to match against provider names when selecting which probes to list".
You don't list providers, you list probes.
> If omitted, probes by all @var{providers} are listed.
Here "providers" is a literal word, so it should not have the @var
markup.
> +@item -pstap|-probe-stap @r{[}@var{objfile}:@r{]}@r{[}@var{provider}:@r{]}@var{name}
Likewise here: the brackets should be nested, I believe.
> +The @sc{gnu}/Linux tool @code{SystemTap} provides a way for
> +applications to embed static probes. @xref{Static Probe Points}, for more
> +information on finding and using static probes. This form of linespec
> +specifies the location of such a static probe.
> +
> +If @var{objfile} is given, only probes coming from that shared library
> +or executable are considered. If @var{provider} is given, then only
> +probes from that provider are considered. If several probes match the
> +spec, @value{GDBN} will insert a breakpoint at each one of those probes.
Here, you give almost no clue that these parameters can be regular
expressions. Please rewrite to make that clear, e.g.:
If @var{objfile} is given, only probes coming from a shared library
or executable matching @var{objfile} as a regular expression are
considered.
> +@cindex Semaphores on static probe points
Lower-case "semaphores", please. Index entries should all start with
a lowercase letter.
> +Some probes have an associated semaphore variable; for instance, this
> +happens automatically if you defined your probe using a DTrace-style
> +@file{.d} file. If your probe has a semaphore, @value{GDBN} will
> +automatically enable it when you specify a breakpoint using the
> +@samp{-p} notation. But, if you put a breakpoint at a probe's
> +location by some other method (e.g., @code{break file:line}), then
> +@value{GDBN} will not automatically set the semaphore.
Why is this here? Shouldn't it be where static probe points are
described?
> +@item $_probe_arg@var{n}
> +@var{n} varies from 0 to 11.
Not "varies from 0 to 11", but "is an integer between 0 and 11".
There's no variation here, as in case of a variable whose value can
change.
OK with those changes.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2012-04-06 9:27 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 83+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2012-04-06 3:28 [PATCH 0/4 v2] Implement support for SystemTap probes on userspace Sergio Durigan Junior
2012-04-06 3:32 ` [PATCH 1/4 v2] Refactor internal variable mechanism Sergio Durigan Junior
2012-04-06 3:36 ` [PATCH 2/4 v2] Implement new features needed for handling SystemTap probes Sergio Durigan Junior
2012-04-11 19:06 ` Jan Kratochvil
2012-04-11 22:14 ` Sergio Durigan Junior
2012-04-11 23:33 ` Jan Kratochvil
2012-04-06 3:37 ` [PATCH 4/4 v2] Documentation and testsuite changes Sergio Durigan Junior
2012-04-06 9:27 ` Eli Zaretskii [this message]
2012-04-09 21:37 ` Sergio Durigan Junior
2012-04-06 4:11 ` [PATCH 3/4 v2] Use longjmp and exception probes when available Sergio Durigan Junior
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2011-10-26 21:08 [PATCH] Implement new `info core mappings' command Sergio Durigan Junior
2011-10-26 21:25 ` Sergio Durigan Junior
2011-10-27 7:30 ` Eli Zaretskii
2011-10-27 18:09 ` Sergio Durigan Junior
2011-10-29 19:48 ` Eli Zaretskii
2011-10-31 0:34 ` Jan Kratochvil
2011-10-31 7:00 ` Sergio Durigan Junior
2011-10-31 8:13 ` Jan Kratochvil
2011-10-31 12:57 ` Pedro Alves
2011-11-01 11:54 ` [patch] `info proc ' completion [Re: [PATCH] Implement new `info core mappings' command] Jan Kratochvil
2011-11-01 16:23 ` Eli Zaretskii
2011-11-03 14:12 ` [patch] `info proc *' help fix [Re: [patch] `info proc ' completion] Jan Kratochvil
2011-11-03 16:57 ` Eli Zaretskii
2011-11-03 17:07 ` Jan Kratochvil
2011-11-03 18:08 ` Eli Zaretskii
2011-11-03 18:25 ` Jan Kratochvil
2011-11-02 18:30 ` [patch] `info proc ' completion [Re: [PATCH] Implement new `info core mappings' command] Pedro Alves
2011-11-02 18:48 ` [commit] " Jan Kratochvil
2011-11-03 20:01 ` [PATCH] Implement new `info core mappings' command Sergio Durigan Junior
2011-11-04 10:38 ` Eli Zaretskii
2011-11-04 16:27 ` Jan Kratochvil
2011-11-08 1:49 ` Sergio Durigan Junior
2011-11-08 21:47 ` Jan Kratochvil
2011-11-09 20:32 ` Jan Kratochvil
2011-11-16 4:10 ` Sergio Durigan Junior
2011-11-21 16:15 ` Sergio Durigan Junior
2011-11-23 16:32 ` [rfc] Options for "info mappings" etc. (Re: [PATCH] Implement new `info core mappings' command) Ulrich Weigand
2011-11-23 23:37 ` Sergio Durigan Junior
2011-12-01 19:51 ` Ulrich Weigand
2011-12-05 12:59 ` Pedro Alves
2011-12-05 15:02 ` Ulrich Weigand
2011-12-06 16:01 ` Pedro Alves
2011-12-06 17:19 ` Ulrich Weigand
2011-12-07 16:29 ` Pedro Alves
2011-12-07 17:24 ` Pedro Alves
2011-12-07 20:14 ` Ulrich Weigand
2011-12-09 13:28 ` Pedro Alves
2011-12-09 14:10 ` Pedro Alves
2011-12-20 23:08 ` Ulrich Weigand
2011-12-21 22:36 ` Jan Kratochvil
2011-12-22 16:15 ` Ulrich Weigand
2012-01-05 16:02 ` Pedro Alves
2012-01-05 18:03 ` Ulrich Weigand
2012-01-05 18:20 ` Pedro Alves
2012-01-05 19:54 ` Ulrich Weigand
2012-01-06 6:41 ` Joel Brobecker
2012-01-06 12:29 ` Pedro Alves
2012-01-06 12:27 ` Pedro Alves
2012-01-09 15:44 ` Ulrich Weigand
2012-01-11 16:38 ` Pedro Alves
2012-01-11 18:32 ` Ulrich Weigand
2012-01-05 18:37 ` Mark Kettenis
2012-01-05 19:35 ` Ulrich Weigand
2011-04-04 3:09 [PATCH 4/6] Implement support for SystemTap probes Sergio Durigan Junior
2011-04-04 19:06 ` Eli Zaretskii
2011-04-06 20:20 ` Tom Tromey
2011-04-06 20:52 ` Sergio Durigan Junior
2011-04-07 2:41 ` Yao Qi
2011-04-07 3:32 ` Sergio Durigan Junior
2011-04-07 17:04 ` Tom Tromey
2011-04-11 3:21 ` Yao Qi
2011-04-08 12:38 ` Sergio Durigan Junior
2011-04-11 3:52 ` Yao Qi
2011-08-12 15:45 ` Jan Kratochvil
2011-08-12 17:22 ` Frank Ch. Eigler
2011-08-12 21:33 ` Sergio Durigan Junior
2011-04-19 16:42 ` Jan Kratochvil
2012-05-07 19:36 ` Jan Kratochvil
2012-05-07 19:54 ` Sergio Durigan Junior
2012-05-07 19:58 ` Jan Kratochvil
2012-05-07 20:26 ` Sergio Durigan Junior
2012-05-07 20:38 ` Jan Kratochvil
2012-05-08 1:36 ` Sergio Durigan Junior
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=83fwchb48p.fsf@gnu.org \
--to=eliz@gnu.org \
--cc=gdb-patches@sourceware.org \
--cc=sergiodj@redhat.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox