From: Eli Zaretskii <eliz@gnu.org>
To: Sergio Durigan Junior <sergiodj@redhat.com>
Cc: gdb-patches@sourceware.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Implement new `info core mappings' command
Date: Thu, 27 Oct 2011 07:30:00 -0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <E1RJK0U-0003hX-AT@fencepost.gnu.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <m3mxcn8nry.fsf@redhat.com> (message from Sergio Durigan Junior on Wed, 26 Oct 2011 19:07:45 -0200)
> From: Sergio Durigan Junior <sergiodj@redhat.com>
> Date: Wed, 26 Oct 2011 19:07:45 -0200
>
> *** Changes since GDB 7.3.1
>
> +* GDB has a new `info core mappings' command. It displays the memory
> + regions in a corefile, similar to `info proc mappings' command.
This is okay.
> + while (argv != NULL && *argv != NULL)
> + {
> + if (strncmp (argv[0], "mappings", strlen (argv[0])) == 0)
> + {
> + mappings_f = 1;
> + }
> + else if (strncmp (argv[0], "all", strlen (argv[0])) == 0)
> + {
> + all = 1;
> + }
> + argv++;
> + }
What is this "all" stuff about?
> +@cindex core dump file
This index entry is too general, it sounds like this section describes
everything about core dump files that GDB supports. Better qualify
it, e.g.
@cindex core dump file, list mapped memory
> +@cindex memory address space mappings
Likewise; you need to qualify this so it's clear it only talks about
memory mappings in the context of core file debugging.
> +@item info core
> +@item info core mappings
You cannot have 2 @item's in a row. All but the first one need to be
@itemx.
> +Report the memory address space ranges accessible in the core file.
I would lose the "space" part.
I think a short example of output would be good here.
> One thing I am not sure is where to put the entry for this command on
> the documentation. I decided to put it below `info proc', but I'd be
> glad if you could give your opinions.
I don't think it's good to put it in the same section as "info proc",
because we say at the beginning of the section
Many versions of SVR4 and compatible systems provide a facility called
@samp{/proc} that can be used to examine the image of a running
process using file-system subroutines.
But this new command has nothing to do with /proc, and does not need
/proc support to work, right?
If /proc is indeed irrelevant, then I'd prefer a separate @subsection
alongside this one. You'd need to add some short explanation of the
background and use case(s) for this command, but having that is a good
idea anyway: as written now, this command lands on the reader out of
the blue, more or less.
Thanks.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2011-10-27 7:04 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 83+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2011-10-26 21:08 Sergio Durigan Junior
2011-10-26 21:25 ` Sergio Durigan Junior
2011-10-27 7:30 ` Eli Zaretskii [this message]
2011-10-27 18:09 ` Sergio Durigan Junior
2011-10-29 19:48 ` Eli Zaretskii
2011-10-31 0:34 ` Jan Kratochvil
2011-10-31 7:00 ` Sergio Durigan Junior
2011-10-31 8:13 ` Jan Kratochvil
2011-10-31 12:57 ` Pedro Alves
2011-11-01 11:54 ` [patch] `info proc ' completion [Re: [PATCH] Implement new `info core mappings' command] Jan Kratochvil
2011-11-01 16:23 ` Eli Zaretskii
2011-11-03 14:12 ` [patch] `info proc *' help fix [Re: [patch] `info proc ' completion] Jan Kratochvil
2011-11-03 16:57 ` Eli Zaretskii
2011-11-03 17:07 ` Jan Kratochvil
2011-11-03 18:08 ` Eli Zaretskii
2011-11-03 18:25 ` Jan Kratochvil
2011-11-02 18:30 ` [patch] `info proc ' completion [Re: [PATCH] Implement new `info core mappings' command] Pedro Alves
2011-11-02 18:48 ` [commit] " Jan Kratochvil
2011-11-03 20:01 ` [PATCH] Implement new `info core mappings' command Sergio Durigan Junior
2011-11-04 10:38 ` Eli Zaretskii
2011-11-04 16:27 ` Jan Kratochvil
2011-11-08 1:49 ` Sergio Durigan Junior
2011-11-08 21:47 ` Jan Kratochvil
2011-11-09 20:32 ` Jan Kratochvil
2011-11-16 4:10 ` Sergio Durigan Junior
2011-11-21 16:15 ` Sergio Durigan Junior
2011-11-23 16:32 ` [rfc] Options for "info mappings" etc. (Re: [PATCH] Implement new `info core mappings' command) Ulrich Weigand
2011-11-23 23:37 ` Sergio Durigan Junior
2011-12-01 19:51 ` Ulrich Weigand
2011-12-05 12:59 ` Pedro Alves
2011-12-05 15:02 ` Ulrich Weigand
2011-12-06 16:01 ` Pedro Alves
2011-12-06 17:19 ` Ulrich Weigand
2011-12-07 16:29 ` Pedro Alves
2011-12-07 17:24 ` Pedro Alves
2011-12-07 20:14 ` Ulrich Weigand
2011-12-09 13:28 ` Pedro Alves
2011-12-09 14:10 ` Pedro Alves
2011-12-20 23:08 ` Ulrich Weigand
2011-12-21 22:36 ` Jan Kratochvil
2011-12-22 16:15 ` Ulrich Weigand
2012-01-05 16:02 ` Pedro Alves
2012-01-05 18:03 ` Ulrich Weigand
2012-01-05 18:20 ` Pedro Alves
2012-01-05 19:54 ` Ulrich Weigand
2012-01-06 6:41 ` Joel Brobecker
2012-01-06 12:29 ` Pedro Alves
2012-01-06 12:27 ` Pedro Alves
2012-01-09 15:44 ` Ulrich Weigand
2012-01-11 16:38 ` Pedro Alves
2012-01-11 18:32 ` Ulrich Weigand
2012-01-05 18:37 ` Mark Kettenis
2012-01-05 19:35 ` Ulrich Weigand
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2012-04-06 3:28 [PATCH 0/4 v2] Implement support for SystemTap probes on userspace Sergio Durigan Junior
2012-04-06 3:32 ` [PATCH 1/4 v2] Refactor internal variable mechanism Sergio Durigan Junior
2012-04-06 3:36 ` [PATCH 2/4 v2] Implement new features needed for handling SystemTap probes Sergio Durigan Junior
2012-04-11 19:06 ` Jan Kratochvil
2012-04-11 22:14 ` Sergio Durigan Junior
2012-04-11 23:33 ` Jan Kratochvil
2012-04-06 3:37 ` [PATCH 4/4 v2] Documentation and testsuite changes Sergio Durigan Junior
2012-04-06 9:27 ` Eli Zaretskii
2012-04-09 21:37 ` Sergio Durigan Junior
2012-04-06 4:11 ` [PATCH 3/4 v2] Use longjmp and exception probes when available Sergio Durigan Junior
2011-04-04 3:09 [PATCH 4/6] Implement support for SystemTap probes Sergio Durigan Junior
2011-04-04 19:06 ` Eli Zaretskii
2011-04-06 20:20 ` Tom Tromey
2011-04-06 20:52 ` Sergio Durigan Junior
2011-04-07 2:41 ` Yao Qi
2011-04-07 3:32 ` Sergio Durigan Junior
2011-04-07 17:04 ` Tom Tromey
2011-04-11 3:21 ` Yao Qi
2011-04-08 12:38 ` Sergio Durigan Junior
2011-04-11 3:52 ` Yao Qi
2011-08-12 15:45 ` Jan Kratochvil
2011-08-12 17:22 ` Frank Ch. Eigler
2011-08-12 21:33 ` Sergio Durigan Junior
2011-04-19 16:42 ` Jan Kratochvil
2012-05-07 19:36 ` Jan Kratochvil
2012-05-07 19:54 ` Sergio Durigan Junior
2012-05-07 19:58 ` Jan Kratochvil
2012-05-07 20:26 ` Sergio Durigan Junior
2012-05-07 20:38 ` Jan Kratochvil
2012-05-08 1:36 ` Sergio Durigan Junior
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=E1RJK0U-0003hX-AT@fencepost.gnu.org \
--to=eliz@gnu.org \
--cc=gdb-patches@sourceware.org \
--cc=sergiodj@redhat.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox