* RFA: fix pretty-printing in "bt full"
@ 2008-12-15 20:30 Tom Tromey
2008-12-22 5:01 ` Joel Brobecker
0 siblings, 1 reply; 5+ messages in thread
From: Tom Tromey @ 2008-12-15 20:30 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gdb-patches
Consider this program:
struct s {
int x;
int y;
};
int func2 (struct s val) { return val.y + 5; }
int main (int argc, char **argv)
{
struct s a;
a.x = 5;
a.y = 7;
return func2 (a) != 12;
}
If I set a breakpoint on func2, run, and then invoke "bt full", I see:
(gdb) bt full
#0 func2 (val={x = 5, y = 7}) at b.c:6
No locals.
#1 0x080483a9 in main (argc=1, argv=0xbffff7b4) at b.c:14
a = {
x = 5,
y = 7
}
Note the odd indentation of "a" (there is a tab before "a = ", so you
may need to take your mail program's tab settings into account. On my
terminal this is visually like 8 spaces).
This patch fixes the problem by changing print_variable_value to
accept an indentation argument, like the various val_print functions
do.
After the patch the output looks like this:
(gdb) bt full
#0 func2 (val={x = 5, y = 7}) at b.c:6
No locals.
#1 0x080483a9 in main (argc=1, argv=0xbffff7a4) at b.c:14
a = {
x = 5,
y = 7
}
I think this looks nicer, because the contents of "a" are indented
underneath "a".
Built and regtested on x86-64 (compile farm).
Please review.
thanks,
Tom
2008-12-15 Tom Tromey <tromey@redhat.com>
* stack.c (print_block_frame_locals): Print spaces, not tabs.
Pass indentation level to print_variable_value.
(print_frame_arg_vars): Update.
* value.h (print_variable_value): Update.
* printcmd.c (print_variable_value): Add 'indent' argument. Use
common_val_print.
* f-valprint.c (info_common_command): Update.
diff --git a/gdb/f-valprint.c b/gdb/f-valprint.c
index f893b49..26fe220 100644
--- a/gdb/f-valprint.c
+++ b/gdb/f-valprint.c
@@ -567,7 +567,7 @@ info_common_command (char *comname, int from_tty)
while (entry != NULL)
{
printf_filtered ("%s = ", SYMBOL_PRINT_NAME (entry->symbol));
- print_variable_value (entry->symbol, fi, gdb_stdout);
+ print_variable_value (entry->symbol, fi, gdb_stdout, 0);
printf_filtered ("\n");
entry = entry->next;
}
diff --git a/gdb/printcmd.c b/gdb/printcmd.c
index 6d6b915..47dbc98 100644
--- a/gdb/printcmd.c
+++ b/gdb/printcmd.c
@@ -1731,17 +1731,20 @@ disable_display_command (char *args, int from_tty)
\f
/* Print the value in stack frame FRAME of a variable specified by a
- struct symbol. */
+ struct symbol. STREAM is the ui_file on which to print the value.
+ INDENT is used to control indentation of sub-parts of the value; it
+ should be set to the number of indentation levels already emitted
+ at the point at which this function is called. */
void
print_variable_value (struct symbol *var, struct frame_info *frame,
- struct ui_file *stream)
+ struct ui_file *stream, int indent)
{
struct value *val = read_var_value (var, frame);
struct value_print_options opts;
get_user_print_options (&opts);
- value_print (val, stream, &opts);
+ common_val_print (val, stream, indent, &opts, current_language);
}
static void
diff --git a/gdb/stack.c b/gdb/stack.c
index 3c1019b..dab332a 100644
--- a/gdb/stack.c
+++ b/gdb/stack.c
@@ -1375,10 +1375,10 @@ print_block_frame_locals (struct block *b, struct frame_info *frame,
break;
values_printed = 1;
for (j = 0; j < num_tabs; j++)
- fputs_filtered ("\t", stream);
+ fputs_filtered (" ", stream);
fputs_filtered (SYMBOL_PRINT_NAME (sym), stream);
fputs_filtered (" = ", stream);
- print_variable_value (sym, frame, stream);
+ print_variable_value (sym, frame, stream, 4 * num_tabs);
fprintf_filtered (stream, "\n");
break;
@@ -1591,7 +1591,7 @@ print_frame_arg_vars (struct frame_info *frame, struct ui_file *stream)
sym2 = lookup_symbol (SYMBOL_LINKAGE_NAME (sym),
b, VAR_DOMAIN, NULL);
- print_variable_value (sym2, frame, stream);
+ print_variable_value (sym2, frame, stream, 0);
fprintf_filtered (stream, "\n");
}
}
diff --git a/gdb/value.h b/gdb/value.h
index a882004..6c4499b 100644
--- a/gdb/value.h
+++ b/gdb/value.h
@@ -559,7 +559,8 @@ extern int val_print_string (CORE_ADDR addr, int len, int width,
extern void print_variable_value (struct symbol *var,
struct frame_info *frame,
- struct ui_file *stream);
+ struct ui_file *stream,
+ int indent);
extern int check_field (struct type *, const char *);
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread* Re: RFA: fix pretty-printing in "bt full"
2008-12-15 20:30 RFA: fix pretty-printing in "bt full" Tom Tromey
@ 2008-12-22 5:01 ` Joel Brobecker
2008-12-22 14:18 ` Tom Tromey
0 siblings, 1 reply; 5+ messages in thread
From: Joel Brobecker @ 2008-12-22 5:01 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Tom Tromey; +Cc: gdb-patches
> I think this looks nicer, because the contents of "a" are indented
> underneath "a".
I agree.
> 2008-12-15 Tom Tromey <tromey@redhat.com>
>
> * stack.c (print_block_frame_locals): Print spaces, not tabs.
> Pass indentation level to print_variable_value.
> (print_frame_arg_vars): Update.
> * value.h (print_variable_value): Update.
> * printcmd.c (print_variable_value): Add 'indent' argument. Use
> common_val_print.
> * f-valprint.c (info_common_command): Update.
Just one comment: How about letting print_variable_value do all
the indenting instead of having the caller indent the first line?
I think that would simplify the usage as well as the description.
What do you think?
The rest looks OK to me.
Thanks,
--
Joel
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread
* Re: RFA: fix pretty-printing in "bt full"
2008-12-22 5:01 ` Joel Brobecker
@ 2008-12-22 14:18 ` Tom Tromey
2008-12-22 20:52 ` Joel Brobecker
0 siblings, 1 reply; 5+ messages in thread
From: Tom Tromey @ 2008-12-22 14:18 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Joel Brobecker; +Cc: gdb-patches
>>>>> "Joel" == Joel Brobecker <brobecker@adacore.com> writes:
Joel> Just one comment: How about letting print_variable_value do all
Joel> the indenting instead of having the caller indent the first line?
Joel> I think that would simplify the usage as well as the description.
Joel> What do you think?
Ok, here's another version. This one renames the function, since
after its purpose changed the old name seemed incorrect.
Also, this may introduce a behavior change in print_frame_arg_vars. I
haven't tried to test this, but the old code printed the variable name
before looking up the second symbol; it seems to me that the new code
could fail while looking up the second symbol and then not print
anything.
Built and regtested on x86-64 (compile farm).
Tom
2008-12-22 Tom Tromey <tromey@redhat.com>
* stack.c (print_block_frame_locals): Print spaces, not tabs.
Update for call to print_variable_and_value.
(print_frame_arg_vars): Update.
* value.h (print_variable_and_value): Rename from
print_variable_value. Add 'name' and 'indent' parameters.
* printcmd.c (print_variable_and_value): Rename from
print_variable_value. Add 'name' and 'indent' parameters. Use
common_val_print.
* f-valprint.c (info_common_command): Update.
diff --git a/gdb/f-valprint.c b/gdb/f-valprint.c
index f893b49..a2d2a20 100644
--- a/gdb/f-valprint.c
+++ b/gdb/f-valprint.c
@@ -566,9 +566,7 @@ info_common_command (char *comname, int from_tty)
while (entry != NULL)
{
- printf_filtered ("%s = ", SYMBOL_PRINT_NAME (entry->symbol));
- print_variable_value (entry->symbol, fi, gdb_stdout);
- printf_filtered ("\n");
+ print_variable_and_value (NULL, entry->symbol, fi, gdb_stdout, 0);
entry = entry->next;
}
}
diff --git a/gdb/printcmd.c b/gdb/printcmd.c
index 6d6b915..c4262d5 100644
--- a/gdb/printcmd.c
+++ b/gdb/printcmd.c
@@ -1731,17 +1731,28 @@ disable_display_command (char *args, int from_tty)
\f
/* Print the value in stack frame FRAME of a variable specified by a
- struct symbol. */
+ struct symbol. NAME is the name to print; if NULL then VAR's print
+ name will be used. STREAM is the ui_file on which to print the
+ value. INDENT specifies the number of indent levels to print
+ before printing the variable name. */
void
-print_variable_value (struct symbol *var, struct frame_info *frame,
- struct ui_file *stream)
+print_variable_and_value (const char *name, struct symbol *var,
+ struct frame_info *frame,
+ struct ui_file *stream, int indent)
{
- struct value *val = read_var_value (var, frame);
+ struct value *val;
struct value_print_options opts;
+ if (!name)
+ name = SYMBOL_PRINT_NAME (var);
+
+ fprintf_filtered (stream, "%s%s = ", n_spaces (2 * indent), name);
+
+ val = read_var_value (var, frame);
get_user_print_options (&opts);
- value_print (val, stream, &opts);
+ common_val_print (val, stream, indent, &opts, current_language);
+ fprintf_filtered (stream, "\n");
}
static void
diff --git a/gdb/stack.c b/gdb/stack.c
index 3c1019b..51dd1bc 100644
--- a/gdb/stack.c
+++ b/gdb/stack.c
@@ -1374,12 +1374,7 @@ print_block_frame_locals (struct block *b, struct frame_info *frame,
if (SYMBOL_IS_ARGUMENT (sym))
break;
values_printed = 1;
- for (j = 0; j < num_tabs; j++)
- fputs_filtered ("\t", stream);
- fputs_filtered (SYMBOL_PRINT_NAME (sym), stream);
- fputs_filtered (" = ", stream);
- print_variable_value (sym, frame, stream);
- fprintf_filtered (stream, "\n");
+ print_variable_and_value (NULL, sym, frame, stream, 4 * num_tabs);
break;
default:
@@ -1575,8 +1570,6 @@ print_frame_arg_vars (struct frame_info *frame, struct ui_file *stream)
if (SYMBOL_IS_ARGUMENT (sym))
{
values_printed = 1;
- fputs_filtered (SYMBOL_PRINT_NAME (sym), stream);
- fputs_filtered (" = ", stream);
/* We have to look up the symbol because arguments can have
two entries (one a parameter, one a local) and the one we
@@ -1591,8 +1584,8 @@ print_frame_arg_vars (struct frame_info *frame, struct ui_file *stream)
sym2 = lookup_symbol (SYMBOL_LINKAGE_NAME (sym),
b, VAR_DOMAIN, NULL);
- print_variable_value (sym2, frame, stream);
- fprintf_filtered (stream, "\n");
+ print_variable_and_value (SYMBOL_PRINT_NAME (sym), sym2,
+ frame, stream, 0);
}
}
diff --git a/gdb/value.h b/gdb/value.h
index a882004..2961919 100644
--- a/gdb/value.h
+++ b/gdb/value.h
@@ -557,9 +557,11 @@ extern int val_print_string (CORE_ADDR addr, int len, int width,
struct ui_file *stream,
const struct value_print_options *options);
-extern void print_variable_value (struct symbol *var,
- struct frame_info *frame,
- struct ui_file *stream);
+extern void print_variable_and_value (const char *name,
+ struct symbol *var,
+ struct frame_info *frame,
+ struct ui_file *stream,
+ int indent);
extern int check_field (struct type *, const char *);
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread* Re: RFA: fix pretty-printing in "bt full"
2008-12-22 14:18 ` Tom Tromey
@ 2008-12-22 20:52 ` Joel Brobecker
2008-12-22 23:17 ` Tom Tromey
0 siblings, 1 reply; 5+ messages in thread
From: Joel Brobecker @ 2008-12-22 20:52 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Tom Tromey; +Cc: gdb-patches
> Also, this may introduce a behavior change in print_frame_arg_vars. I
> haven't tried to test this, but the old code printed the variable name
> before looking up the second symbol; it seems to me that the new code
> could fail while looking up the second symbol and then not print
> anything.
I don't think that this would be a problem in practice. I don't think
it should error out. See lookup_block_symbol:
/* Note that parameter symbols do not always show up last in the
list; this loop makes sure to take anything else other than
parameter symbols first; it only uses parameter symbols as a
last resort. Note that this only takes up extra computation
time on a match. */
So, even if there is no local symbol for our parameter symbol,
lookup_symbol should still return the parameter one as a fallback.
But even if the call to lookup_symbol did error-out, not having
the name of the parameter under those unusual circumstance shouldn't
be too bad, given that the output will be broken by the error message.
> 2008-12-22 Tom Tromey <tromey@redhat.com>
>
> * stack.c (print_block_frame_locals): Print spaces, not tabs.
> Update for call to print_variable_and_value.
> (print_frame_arg_vars): Update.
> * value.h (print_variable_and_value): Rename from
> print_variable_value. Add 'name' and 'indent' parameters.
> * printcmd.c (print_variable_and_value): Rename from
> print_variable_value. Add 'name' and 'indent' parameters. Use
> common_val_print.
> * f-valprint.c (info_common_command): Update.
OK.
--
Joel
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread* Re: RFA: fix pretty-printing in "bt full"
2008-12-22 20:52 ` Joel Brobecker
@ 2008-12-22 23:17 ` Tom Tromey
0 siblings, 0 replies; 5+ messages in thread
From: Tom Tromey @ 2008-12-22 23:17 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Joel Brobecker; +Cc: gdb-patches
>>>>> "Joel" == Joel Brobecker <brobecker@adacore.com> writes:
Joel> I don't think that this would be a problem in practice. I don't
Joel> think it should error out.
Thanks. I assumed that lookup_symbol could call error, but I didn't
trace through everything to try to see.
Joel> OK.
I checked it in.
Tom
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2008-12-22 23:17 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 5+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2008-12-15 20:30 RFA: fix pretty-printing in "bt full" Tom Tromey
2008-12-22 5:01 ` Joel Brobecker
2008-12-22 14:18 ` Tom Tromey
2008-12-22 20:52 ` Joel Brobecker
2008-12-22 23:17 ` Tom Tromey
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox