Mirror of the gdb-patches mailing list
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Tom Tromey <tromey@redhat.com>
To: Samuel Bronson <naesten@gmail.com>
Cc: gdb-patches@sourceware.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] Add "set/show debug unwinder" prefix commands.
Date: Thu, 04 Jun 2009 22:05:00 -0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <m33aafwt7x.fsf@fleche.redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1243638987-4533-2-git-send-email-naesten@gmail.com> (Samuel Bronson's message of "Fri\, 29 May 2009 19\:16\:27 -0400")

>>>>> "Samuel" == Samuel Bronson <naesten@gmail.com> writes:

Samuel> Also add one subcommand for tracing the sniffing of stack
Samuel> frames by unwinders.

This is also basically ok; just needs a ChangeLog and some formatting
fixlets, nothing serious.

Samuel> +/* trace unwinders called */
Samuel> +static int trace_unwinders;

In the GNU style, comments should be sentences, so should start with a
capital letter and end with a period followed by two spaces.  Yes,
we're that nit picky ;)

There are a few instances of this.

Samuel> +  if (trace_unwinders) {
Samuel> +    fprintf_unfiltered (gdb_stdlog, "[ Searching for unwinder for frame ...\n");
Samuel> +  }

Drop the braces.

Samuel>    for (entry = table->list; entry != NULL; entry = entry->next)
Samuel>      {
Samuel>        struct cleanup *old_cleanup;
Samuel> +      const char *uname = entry->unwinder->unwinder_name;
Samuel> +
Samuel> +      if (trace_unwinders) {

The opening brace is misplaced here, in the GNU style it goes on the
next line.  There are a couple instances of this.

Samuel> +  add_setshow_boolean_cmd ("trace-tried", class_maintenance, &trace_unwinders,

I think this could just be "set debug unwinder", rather than
"set debug unwinder trace-tried".

If you do plan to send another "debug unwinder" sub-command, maybe we
could discuss the naming now, before the patch.

Tom


  parent reply	other threads:[~2009-06-04 22:05 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 11+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2009-05-29 23:09 [PATCH 1/2] Add an undwinder_name field to "struct frame_unwind" for use by "info frame" Samuel Bronson
2009-05-29 23:10 ` [PATCH 2/2] Add "set/show debug unwinder" prefix commands Samuel Bronson
2009-05-30  6:57   ` Eli Zaretskii
2009-05-30 19:25   ` Doug Evans
2009-05-31 15:50     ` Samuel Bronson
2009-06-04 22:05   ` Tom Tromey [this message]
2009-06-09  0:49     ` Samuel Bronson
2009-06-09 19:44       ` Tom Tromey
2009-06-04 22:00 ` [PATCH 1/2] Add an undwinder_name field to "struct frame_unwind" for use by "info frame" Tom Tromey
2009-06-09  0:24   ` Samuel Bronson
2009-06-09 19:41     ` Tom Tromey

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=m33aafwt7x.fsf@fleche.redhat.com \
    --to=tromey@redhat.com \
    --cc=gdb-patches@sourceware.org \
    --cc=naesten@gmail.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox