* Fix gdbserver on ia64
@ 2005-10-24 23:56 Andreas Schwab
2005-10-25 8:02 ` Daniel Jacobowitz
0 siblings, 1 reply; 4+ messages in thread
From: Andreas Schwab @ 2005-10-24 23:56 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gdb-patches
This patch makes gdbserver on ia64 a bit more useful:
- gdb assumes 462 registers, gdbserver 590 registers, causing a mismatch
on the 'g' packet
- gdb assumes it can send/receive at most the size of a 'g' packet in one
'm' packet, gdbserver was assuming at most 2000 bytes.
Andreas.
2005-10-25 Andreas Schwab <schwab@suse.de>
* regformats/reg-ia64.dat: Remove NAT registers.
gdbserver:
* server.c (main): Allocate mem_buf with PBUFSIZ bytes.
* linux-ia64-low.c (ia64_regmap): Remove NAT registers.
(ia64_num_regs): Reduce to 462.
--- gdb/gdbserver/linux-ia64-low.c.~1.3.~ 2002-04-10 11:08:18.000000000 +0200
+++ gdb/gdbserver/linux-ia64-low.c 2005-10-25 00:57:36.000000000 +0200
@@ -26,7 +26,7 @@
#include <sys/reg.h>
#endif
-#define ia64_num_regs 590
+#define ia64_num_regs 462
#include <asm/ptrace_offsets.h>
@@ -263,24 +263,6 @@ static int ia64_regmap[] =
-1, -1, -1, -1, -1, -1, -1, -1, -1, -1,
-1, -1, -1, -1, -1, -1, -1, -1, -1, -1,
-1,
- /* nat bits - not fetched directly; instead we obtain these bits from
- either rnat or unat or from memory. */
- -1, -1, -1, -1, -1, -1, -1, -1,
- -1, -1, -1, -1, -1, -1, -1, -1,
- -1, -1, -1, -1, -1, -1, -1, -1,
- -1, -1, -1, -1, -1, -1, -1, -1,
- -1, -1, -1, -1, -1, -1, -1, -1,
- -1, -1, -1, -1, -1, -1, -1, -1,
- -1, -1, -1, -1, -1, -1, -1, -1,
- -1, -1, -1, -1, -1, -1, -1, -1,
- -1, -1, -1, -1, -1, -1, -1, -1,
- -1, -1, -1, -1, -1, -1, -1, -1,
- -1, -1, -1, -1, -1, -1, -1, -1,
- -1, -1, -1, -1, -1, -1, -1, -1,
- -1, -1, -1, -1, -1, -1, -1, -1,
- -1, -1, -1, -1, -1, -1, -1, -1,
- -1, -1, -1, -1, -1, -1, -1, -1,
- -1, -1, -1, -1, -1, -1, -1, -1,
};
static int
--- gdb/gdbserver/server.c.~1.28.~ 2005-07-14 10:09:54.000000000 +0200
+++ gdb/gdbserver/server.c 2005-10-25 01:14:46.000000000 +0200
@@ -322,7 +322,7 @@ int
main (int argc, char *argv[])
{
char ch, status, *own_buf;
- unsigned char mem_buf[2000];
+ unsigned char *mem_buf;
int i = 0;
int signal;
unsigned int len;
@@ -359,6 +359,7 @@ main (int argc, char *argv[])
initialize_low ();
own_buf = malloc (PBUFSIZ);
+ mem_buf = malloc (PBUFSIZ);
if (pid == 0)
{
--- gdb/regformats/reg-ia64.dat.~1.1.~ 2002-02-01 23:05:28.000000000 +0100
+++ gdb/regformats/reg-ia64.dat 2005-10-25 01:04:29.000000000 +0200
@@ -473,131 +473,3 @@ expedite:ip,psr,r12,bsp,cfm
64:
64:
64:
-64:nat0
-64:nat1
-64:nat2
-64:nat3
-64:nat4
-64:nat5
-64:nat6
-64:nat7
-64:nat8
-64:nat9
-64:nat10
-64:nat11
-64:nat12
-64:nat13
-64:nat14
-64:nat15
-64:nat16
-64:nat17
-64:nat18
-64:nat19
-64:nat20
-64:nat21
-64:nat22
-64:nat23
-64:nat24
-64:nat25
-64:nat26
-64:nat27
-64:nat28
-64:nat29
-64:nat30
-64:nat31
-64:nat32
-64:nat33
-64:nat34
-64:nat35
-64:nat36
-64:nat37
-64:nat38
-64:nat39
-64:nat40
-64:nat41
-64:nat42
-64:nat43
-64:nat44
-64:nat45
-64:nat46
-64:nat47
-64:nat48
-64:nat49
-64:nat50
-64:nat51
-64:nat52
-64:nat53
-64:nat54
-64:nat55
-64:nat56
-64:nat57
-64:nat58
-64:nat59
-64:nat60
-64:nat61
-64:nat62
-64:nat63
-64:nat64
-64:nat65
-64:nat66
-64:nat67
-64:nat68
-64:nat69
-64:nat70
-64:nat71
-64:nat72
-64:nat73
-64:nat74
-64:nat75
-64:nat76
-64:nat77
-64:nat78
-64:nat79
-64:nat80
-64:nat81
-64:nat82
-64:nat83
-64:nat84
-64:nat85
-64:nat86
-64:nat87
-64:nat88
-64:nat89
-64:nat90
-64:nat91
-64:nat92
-64:nat93
-64:nat94
-64:nat95
-64:nat96
-64:nat97
-64:nat98
-64:nat99
-64:nat100
-64:nat101
-64:nat102
-64:nat103
-64:nat104
-64:nat105
-64:nat106
-64:nat107
-64:nat108
-64:nat109
-64:nat110
-64:nat111
-64:nat112
-64:nat113
-64:nat114
-64:nat115
-64:nat116
-64:nat117
-64:nat118
-64:nat119
-64:nat120
-64:nat121
-64:nat122
-64:nat123
-64:nat124
-64:nat125
-64:nat126
-64:nat127
--
Andreas Schwab, SuSE Labs, schwab@suse.de
SuSE Linux Products GmbH, MaxfeldstraÃe 5, 90409 Nürnberg, Germany
Key fingerprint = 58CA 54C7 6D53 942B 1756 01D3 44D5 214B 8276 4ED5
"And now for something completely different."
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread* Re: Fix gdbserver on ia64
2005-10-24 23:56 Fix gdbserver on ia64 Andreas Schwab
@ 2005-10-25 8:02 ` Daniel Jacobowitz
2005-10-25 11:16 ` Andreas Schwab
0 siblings, 1 reply; 4+ messages in thread
From: Daniel Jacobowitz @ 2005-10-25 8:02 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Andreas Schwab; +Cc: gdb-patches
On Tue, Oct 25, 2005 at 01:47:10AM +0200, Andreas Schwab wrote:
> This patch makes gdbserver on ia64 a bit more useful:
>
> - gdb assumes 462 registers, gdbserver 590 registers, causing a mismatch
> on the 'g' packet
> - gdb assumes it can send/receive at most the size of a 'g' packet in one
> 'm' packet, gdbserver was assuming at most 2000 bytes.
Thanks! These are fine. Please get the copyright date in
linux-ia64-low.c too.
Do you know offhand if the NAT bits change is a recent change in gdb,
or if I got it wrong to begin with? I don't know if I ever tested the
ia64 bits.
--
Daniel Jacobowitz
CodeSourcery, LLC
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread
* Re: Fix gdbserver on ia64
2005-10-25 8:02 ` Daniel Jacobowitz
@ 2005-10-25 11:16 ` Andreas Schwab
2005-10-25 12:40 ` Andreas Schwab
0 siblings, 1 reply; 4+ messages in thread
From: Andreas Schwab @ 2005-10-25 11:16 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gdb-patches
Daniel Jacobowitz <drow@false.org> writes:
> Do you know offhand if the NAT bits change is a recent change in gdb,
> or if I got it wrong to begin with?
The nat registers were changed to being pseudo registers about a year ago,
as part of the changes by Jeff Johnston.
Andreas.
--
Andreas Schwab, SuSE Labs, schwab@suse.de
SuSE Linux Products GmbH, MaxfeldstraÃe 5, 90409 Nürnberg, Germany
Key fingerprint = 58CA 54C7 6D53 942B 1756 01D3 44D5 214B 8276 4ED5
"And now for something completely different."
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread
* Re: Fix gdbserver on ia64
2005-10-25 11:16 ` Andreas Schwab
@ 2005-10-25 12:40 ` Andreas Schwab
0 siblings, 0 replies; 4+ messages in thread
From: Andreas Schwab @ 2005-10-25 12:40 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gdb-patches
Andreas Schwab <schwab@suse.de> writes:
> Daniel Jacobowitz <drow@false.org> writes:
>
>> Do you know offhand if the NAT bits change is a recent change in gdb,
>> or if I got it wrong to begin with?
>
> The nat registers were changed to being pseudo registers about a year ago,
Actually two years ago (but still after initial gdbserver support was
added).
Andreas.
--
Andreas Schwab, SuSE Labs, schwab@suse.de
SuSE Linux Products GmbH, MaxfeldstraÃe 5, 90409 Nürnberg, Germany
Key fingerprint = 58CA 54C7 6D53 942B 1756 01D3 44D5 214B 8276 4ED5
"And now for something completely different."
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2005-10-25 11:16 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 4+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2005-10-24 23:56 Fix gdbserver on ia64 Andreas Schwab
2005-10-25 8:02 ` Daniel Jacobowitz
2005-10-25 11:16 ` Andreas Schwab
2005-10-25 12:40 ` Andreas Schwab
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox