From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 2349 invoked by alias); 24 Oct 2005 23:56:41 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sources.redhat.com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sources.redhat.com Received: (qmail 2335 invoked by uid 22791); 24 Oct 2005 23:56:37 -0000 Received: from nevyn.them.org (HELO nevyn.them.org) (66.93.172.17) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.30-dev) with ESMTP; Mon, 24 Oct 2005 23:56:37 +0000 Received: from drow by nevyn.them.org with local (Exim 4.54) id 1EUCB9-0001o6-EA; Mon, 24 Oct 2005 19:56:35 -0400 Date: Tue, 25 Oct 2005 08:02:00 -0000 From: Daniel Jacobowitz To: Andreas Schwab Cc: gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com Subject: Re: Fix gdbserver on ia64 Message-ID: <20051024235635.GA6864@nevyn.them.org> Mail-Followup-To: Andreas Schwab , gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com References: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.8i X-SW-Source: 2005-10/txt/msg00196.txt.bz2 On Tue, Oct 25, 2005 at 01:47:10AM +0200, Andreas Schwab wrote: > This patch makes gdbserver on ia64 a bit more useful: > > - gdb assumes 462 registers, gdbserver 590 registers, causing a mismatch > on the 'g' packet > - gdb assumes it can send/receive at most the size of a 'g' packet in one > 'm' packet, gdbserver was assuming at most 2000 bytes. Thanks! These are fine. Please get the copyright date in linux-ia64-low.c too. Do you know offhand if the NAT bits change is a recent change in gdb, or if I got it wrong to begin with? I don't know if I ever tested the ia64 bits. -- Daniel Jacobowitz CodeSourcery, LLC