From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 11554 invoked by alias); 25 Oct 2005 11:16:16 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sources.redhat.com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sources.redhat.com Received: (qmail 11517 invoked by uid 22791); 25 Oct 2005 11:16:13 -0000 Received: from mx2.suse.de (HELO mx2.suse.de) (195.135.220.15) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.30-dev) with ESMTP; Tue, 25 Oct 2005 11:16:13 +0000 Received: from Relay2.suse.de (mail2.suse.de [195.135.221.8]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mx2.suse.de (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6F4251D909 for ; Tue, 25 Oct 2005 13:16:08 +0200 (CEST) From: Andreas Schwab To: gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com Subject: Re: Fix gdbserver on ia64 References: <20051024235635.GA6864@nevyn.them.org> X-Yow: Life is selling REVOLUTIONARY HAIR PRODUCTS! Date: Tue, 25 Oct 2005 12:40:00 -0000 In-Reply-To: (Andreas Schwab's message of "Tue, 25 Oct 2005 12:44:58 +0200") Message-ID: User-Agent: Gnus/5.110003 (No Gnus v0.3) Emacs/22.0.50 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-SW-Source: 2005-10/txt/msg00199.txt.bz2 Andreas Schwab writes: > Daniel Jacobowitz writes: > >> Do you know offhand if the NAT bits change is a recent change in gdb, >> or if I got it wrong to begin with? > > The nat registers were changed to being pseudo registers about a year ago, Actually two years ago (but still after initial gdbserver support was added). Andreas. -- Andreas Schwab, SuSE Labs, schwab@suse.de SuSE Linux Products GmbH, Maxfeldstraße 5, 90409 Nürnberg, Germany Key fingerprint = 58CA 54C7 6D53 942B 1756 01D3 44D5 214B 8276 4ED5 "And now for something completely different."