* [patch] i386-nto-tdep.c: Add support for xmm registers.
@ 2009-05-27 19:20 Aleksandar Ristovski
2009-06-09 2:23 ` Aleksandar Ristovski
2009-06-11 15:09 ` Joel Brobecker
0 siblings, 2 replies; 8+ messages in thread
From: Aleksandar Ristovski @ 2009-05-27 19:20 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gdb-patches
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 677 bytes --]
Hello,
This adds support for xmm registers for QNX target.
Thanks,
Aleksandar
ChangeLog
Add support for XMM registers.
* i386-nto-tdep.c (i386_nto_target): Remove definition.
(i386nto_regset_id): Add case for SSE register set.
(i386nto_register_area): Correctly calculate offsets and
sizes for all supported registers.
(I386_NTO_SIGCONTEXT_OFFSET): Remove macro definition.
(i386nto_sigcontext_addr): Use better method of retrieving
sigcontext pointer.
(init_i386nto_ops): Remove i386_nto_target.
(i386nto_init_abi): Remove nto_svr4_so_ops indirection.
Properly setup tdep params sc_reg_offset and sc_num_regs.
Remove nto_svr4_so_ops and make changes accordingly.
[-- Attachment #2: i386-nto-tdep.c-20090527.patch --]
[-- Type: text/plain, Size: 8179 bytes --]
Index: gdb/i386-nto-tdep.c
===================================================================
RCS file: /cvs/src/src/gdb/i386-nto-tdep.c,v
retrieving revision 1.32
diff -u -p -r1.32 i386-nto-tdep.c
--- gdb/i386-nto-tdep.c 22 Feb 2009 01:02:17 -0000 1.32
+++ gdb/i386-nto-tdep.c 27 May 2009 19:06:41 -0000
@@ -34,9 +34,6 @@
#include "solib.h"
#include "solib-svr4.h"
-/* Target vector for QNX NTO x86. */
-static struct nto_target_ops i386_nto_target;
-
#ifndef X86_CPU_FXSR
#define X86_CPU_FXSR (1L << 12)
#endif
@@ -126,6 +123,8 @@ i386nto_regset_id (int regno)
return NTO_REG_GENERAL;
else if (regno < I386_NUM_GREGS + I386_NUM_FREGS)
return NTO_REG_FLOAT;
+ else if (regno < I386_SSE_NUM_REGS)
+ return NTO_REG_FLOAT; /* We store xmm registers in fxsave_area. */
return -1; /* Error. */
}
@@ -134,6 +133,7 @@ static int
i386nto_register_area (struct gdbarch *gdbarch,
int regno, int regset, unsigned *off)
{
+ struct gdbarch_tdep *tdep = gdbarch_tdep (gdbarch);
int len;
*off = 0;
@@ -149,30 +149,98 @@ i386nto_register_area (struct gdbarch *g
}
else if (regset == NTO_REG_FLOAT)
{
- unsigned off_adjust, regsize, regset_size;
+ unsigned off_adjust, regsize, regset_size, regno_base;
+ /* The following are flags indicating number in our fxsave_area. */
+ int first_four = (regno >= I387_FCTRL_REGNUM (tdep)
+ && regno <= I387_FISEG_REGNUM (tdep));
+ int second_four = (regno > I387_FISEG_REGNUM (tdep)
+ && regno <= I387_FOP_REGNUM (tdep));
+ int st_reg = (regno >= I387_ST0_REGNUM (tdep)
+ && regno < I387_ST0_REGNUM (tdep) + 8);
+ int xmm_reg = (regno >= I387_XMM0_REGNUM (tdep)
+ && regno < I387_MXCSR_REGNUM (tdep));
if (nto_cpuinfo_valid && nto_cpuinfo_flags | X86_CPU_FXSR)
{
- off_adjust = 32;
- regsize = 16;
regset_size = 512;
+ /* fxsave_area structure. */
+ if (first_four)
+ {
+ /* fpu_control_word, fpu_status_word, fpu_tag_word, fpu_operand
+ registers. */
+ regsize = 2; /* Two bytes each. */
+ off_adjust = 0;
+ regno_base = I387_FCTRL_REGNUM (tdep);
+ }
+ else if (second_four)
+ {
+ /* fpu_ip, fpu_cs, fpu_op, fpu_ds registers. */
+ regsize = 4;
+ off_adjust = 8;
+ regno_base = I387_FISEG_REGNUM (tdep) + 1;
+ }
+ else if (st_reg)
+ {
+ /* ST registers. */
+ regsize = 16;
+ off_adjust = 32;
+ regno_base = I387_ST0_REGNUM (tdep);
+ }
+ else if (xmm_reg)
+ {
+ /* XMM registers. */
+ regsize = 16;
+ off_adjust = 160;
+ regno_base = I387_XMM0_REGNUM (tdep);
+ }
+ else if (regno == I387_MXCSR_REGNUM (tdep))
+ {
+ regsize = 4;
+ off_adjust = 24;
+ regno_base = I387_MXCSR_REGNUM (tdep);
+ }
+ else
+ {
+ /* Whole regset. */
+ gdb_assert (regno == -1);
+ off_adjust = 0;
+ regno_base = 0;
+ regsize = regset_size;
+ }
}
else
{
- off_adjust = 28;
- regsize = 10;
- regset_size = 128;
+ regset_size = 108;
+ /* fsave_area structure. */
+ if (first_four || second_four)
+ {
+ /* fpu_control_word, ... , fpu_ds registers. */
+ regsize = 4;
+ off_adjust = 0;
+ regno_base = I387_FCTRL_REGNUM (tdep);
+ }
+ else if (st_reg)
+ {
+ /* One of ST registers. */
+ regsize = 10;
+ off_adjust = 7 * 4;
+ regno_base = I387_ST0_REGNUM (tdep);
+ }
+ else
+ {
+ /* Whole regset. */
+ gdb_assert (regno == -1);
+ off_adjust = 0;
+ regno_base = 0;
+ regsize = regset_size;
+ }
}
- if (regno == -1)
- return regset_size;
-
- *off = (regno - gdbarch_fp0_regnum (gdbarch)) * regsize + off_adjust;
- return 10;
- /* Why 10 instead of regsize? GDB only stores 10 bytes per FP
- register so if we're sending a register back to the target,
- we only want pdebug to write 10 bytes so as not to clobber
- the reserved 6 bytes in the fxsave structure. */
+ if (regno != -1)
+ *off = off_adjust + (regno - regno_base) * regsize;
+ else
+ *off = 0;
+ return regsize;
}
return -1;
}
@@ -217,8 +285,6 @@ i386nto_sigtramp_p (struct frame_info *t
return name && strcmp ("__signalstub", name) == 0;
}
-#define I386_NTO_SIGCONTEXT_OFFSET 136
-
/* Assuming THIS_FRAME is a QNX Neutrino sigtramp routine, return the
address of the associated sigcontext structure. */
@@ -226,33 +292,33 @@ static CORE_ADDR
i386nto_sigcontext_addr (struct frame_info *this_frame)
{
char buf[4];
- CORE_ADDR sp;
+ CORE_ADDR ptrctx;
- get_frame_register (this_frame, I386_ESP_REGNUM, buf);
- sp = extract_unsigned_integer (buf, 4);
+ /* We store __ucontext_t addr in EDI register. */
+ get_frame_register (this_frame, I386_EDI_REGNUM, buf);
+ ptrctx = extract_unsigned_integer (buf, 4);
+ ptrctx += 24 /* Context pointer is at this offset. */;
- return sp + I386_NTO_SIGCONTEXT_OFFSET;
+ return ptrctx;
}
static void
init_i386nto_ops (void)
{
- i386_nto_target.regset_id = i386nto_regset_id;
- i386_nto_target.supply_gregset = i386nto_supply_gregset;
- i386_nto_target.supply_fpregset = i386nto_supply_fpregset;
- i386_nto_target.supply_altregset = nto_dummy_supply_regset;
- i386_nto_target.supply_regset = i386nto_supply_regset;
- i386_nto_target.register_area = i386nto_register_area;
- i386_nto_target.regset_fill = i386nto_regset_fill;
- i386_nto_target.fetch_link_map_offsets =
- svr4_ilp32_fetch_link_map_offsets;
+ nto_regset_id = i386nto_regset_id;
+ nto_supply_gregset = i386nto_supply_gregset;
+ nto_supply_fpregset = i386nto_supply_fpregset;
+ nto_supply_altregset = nto_dummy_supply_regset;
+ nto_supply_regset = i386nto_supply_regset;
+ nto_register_area = i386nto_register_area;
+ nto_regset_fill = i386nto_regset_fill;
+ nto_fetch_link_map_offsets = svr4_ilp32_fetch_link_map_offsets;
}
static void
i386nto_init_abi (struct gdbarch_info info, struct gdbarch *gdbarch)
{
struct gdbarch_tdep *tdep = gdbarch_tdep (gdbarch);
- static struct target_so_ops nto_svr4_so_ops;
/* Deal with our strange signals. */
nto_initialize_signals ();
@@ -270,8 +336,8 @@ i386nto_init_abi (struct gdbarch_info in
tdep->sigtramp_p = i386nto_sigtramp_p;
tdep->sigcontext_addr = i386nto_sigcontext_addr;
- tdep->sc_pc_offset = 56;
- tdep->sc_sp_offset = 68;
+ tdep->sc_reg_offset = i386nto_gregset_reg_offset;
+ tdep->sc_num_regs = ARRAY_SIZE (i386nto_gregset_reg_offset);
/* Setjmp()'s return PC saved in EDX (5). */
tdep->jb_pc_offset = 20; /* 5x32 bit ints in. */
@@ -279,31 +345,17 @@ i386nto_init_abi (struct gdbarch_info in
set_solib_svr4_fetch_link_map_offsets
(gdbarch, svr4_ilp32_fetch_link_map_offsets);
- /* Initialize this lazily, to avoid an initialization order
- dependency on solib-svr4.c's _initialize routine. */
- if (nto_svr4_so_ops.in_dynsym_resolve_code == NULL)
- {
- nto_svr4_so_ops = svr4_so_ops;
+ /* Our loader handles solib relocations differently than svr4. */
+ svr4_so_ops.relocate_section_addresses = nto_relocate_section_addresses;
- /* Our loader handles solib relocations differently than svr4. */
- nto_svr4_so_ops.relocate_section_addresses
- = nto_relocate_section_addresses;
-
- /* Supply a nice function to find our solibs. */
- nto_svr4_so_ops.find_and_open_solib
- = nto_find_and_open_solib;
-
- /* Our linker code is in libc. */
- nto_svr4_so_ops.in_dynsym_resolve_code
- = nto_in_dynsym_resolve_code;
- }
- set_solib_ops (gdbarch, &nto_svr4_so_ops);
+ /* Supply a nice function to find our solibs. */
+ svr4_so_ops.find_and_open_solib = nto_find_and_open_solib;
- nto_set_target (&i386_nto_target);
-}
+ /* Our linker code is in libc. */
+ svr4_so_ops.in_dynsym_resolve_code = nto_in_dynsym_resolve_code;
-/* Provide a prototype to silence -Wmissing-prototypes. */
-extern initialize_file_ftype _initialize_i386nto_tdep;
+ set_solib_ops (gdbarch, &svr4_so_ops);
+}
void
_initialize_i386nto_tdep (void)
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 8+ messages in thread* Re: [patch] i386-nto-tdep.c: Add support for xmm registers.
2009-05-27 19:20 [patch] i386-nto-tdep.c: Add support for xmm registers Aleksandar Ristovski
@ 2009-06-09 2:23 ` Aleksandar Ristovski
2009-06-11 15:09 ` Joel Brobecker
1 sibling, 0 replies; 8+ messages in thread
From: Aleksandar Ristovski @ 2009-06-09 2:23 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gdb-patches
ping?
Aleksandar Ristovski wrote:
> Hello,
>
> This adds support for xmm registers for QNX target.
>
> Thanks,
>
> Aleksandar
>
>
> ChangeLog
>
>
> Add support for XMM registers.
> * i386-nto-tdep.c (i386_nto_target): Remove definition.
> (i386nto_regset_id): Add case for SSE register set.
> (i386nto_register_area): Correctly calculate offsets and sizes for all
> supported registers.
> (I386_NTO_SIGCONTEXT_OFFSET): Remove macro definition.
> (i386nto_sigcontext_addr): Use better method of retrieving sigcontext
> pointer.
> (init_i386nto_ops): Remove i386_nto_target.
> (i386nto_init_abi): Remove nto_svr4_so_ops indirection. Properly setup
> tdep params sc_reg_offset and sc_num_regs. Remove nto_svr4_so_ops and
> make changes accordingly.
>
>
--
Aleksandar Ristovski
QNX Software Systems
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 8+ messages in thread
* Re: [patch] i386-nto-tdep.c: Add support for xmm registers.
2009-05-27 19:20 [patch] i386-nto-tdep.c: Add support for xmm registers Aleksandar Ristovski
2009-06-09 2:23 ` Aleksandar Ristovski
@ 2009-06-11 15:09 ` Joel Brobecker
2009-06-11 15:32 ` Aleksandar Ristovski
1 sibling, 1 reply; 8+ messages in thread
From: Joel Brobecker @ 2009-06-11 15:09 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Aleksandar Ristovski; +Cc: gdb-patches
> Add support for XMM registers.
> * i386-nto-tdep.c (i386_nto_target): Remove definition.
> (i386nto_regset_id): Add case for SSE register set.
> (i386nto_register_area): Correctly calculate offsets and sizes for all
> supported registers.
> (I386_NTO_SIGCONTEXT_OFFSET): Remove macro definition.
> (i386nto_sigcontext_addr): Use better method of retrieving sigcontext
> pointer.
> (init_i386nto_ops): Remove i386_nto_target.
> (i386nto_init_abi): Remove nto_svr4_so_ops indirection. Properly setup
> tdep params sc_reg_offset and sc_num_regs. Remove nto_svr4_so_ops and
> make changes accordingly.
I won't pretend I understand everything you do in this patch, but
the pieces that are related to registers and sigcontext seem to be
sensible.
However, I found a few hunks which I think are not related to XMM
register support, but rather to shared library support...
> -/* Target vector for QNX NTO x86. */
> -static struct nto_target_ops i386_nto_target;
For next time, it'll be easier for me to review your patches if you leave
this sort of cleanup for a future patch...
> static void
> i386nto_init_abi (struct gdbarch_info info, struct gdbarch *gdbarch)
> {
> struct gdbarch_tdep *tdep = gdbarch_tdep (gdbarch);
> - static struct target_so_ops nto_svr4_so_ops;
Seems unrelated to the patch, no? Same question regarding the hunk
below:
> @@ -279,31 +345,17 @@ i386nto_init_abi (struct gdbarch_info in
> set_solib_svr4_fetch_link_map_offsets
> (gdbarch, svr4_ilp32_fetch_link_map_offsets);
>
> - /* Initialize this lazily, to avoid an initialization order
> - dependency on solib-svr4.c's _initialize routine. */
> - if (nto_svr4_so_ops.in_dynsym_resolve_code == NULL)
> - {
> - nto_svr4_so_ops = svr4_so_ops;
> + /* Our loader handles solib relocations differently than svr4. */
> + svr4_so_ops.relocate_section_addresses = nto_relocate_section_addresses;
>
> - /* Our loader handles solib relocations differently than svr4. */
> - nto_svr4_so_ops.relocate_section_addresses
> - = nto_relocate_section_addresses;
> -
> - /* Supply a nice function to find our solibs. */
> - nto_svr4_so_ops.find_and_open_solib
> - = nto_find_and_open_solib;
> -
> - /* Our linker code is in libc. */
> - nto_svr4_so_ops.in_dynsym_resolve_code
> - = nto_in_dynsym_resolve_code;
> - }
> - set_solib_ops (gdbarch, &nto_svr4_so_ops);
> + /* Supply a nice function to find our solibs. */
> + svr4_so_ops.find_and_open_solib = nto_find_and_open_solib;
>
> - nto_set_target (&i386_nto_target);
> -}
> + /* Our linker code is in libc. */
> + svr4_so_ops.in_dynsym_resolve_code = nto_in_dynsym_resolve_code;
>
> -/* Provide a prototype to silence -Wmissing-prototypes. */
> -extern initialize_file_ftype _initialize_i386nto_tdep;
> + set_solib_ops (gdbarch, &svr4_so_ops);
> +}
>
> void
> _initialize_i386nto_tdep (void)
--
Joel
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 8+ messages in thread* Re: [patch] i386-nto-tdep.c: Add support for xmm registers.
2009-06-11 15:09 ` Joel Brobecker
@ 2009-06-11 15:32 ` Aleksandar Ristovski
2009-06-11 15:37 ` Joel Brobecker
2009-06-11 19:59 ` Mark Kettenis
0 siblings, 2 replies; 8+ messages in thread
From: Aleksandar Ristovski @ 2009-06-11 15:32 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gdb-patches; +Cc: Joel Brobecker
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1267 bytes --]
Thank you for reviewing the patch!
Joel Brobecker wrote:
>> Add support for XMM registers.
>> * i386-nto-tdep.c (i386_nto_target): Remove definition.
>> (i386nto_regset_id): Add case for SSE register set.
>> (i386nto_register_area): Correctly calculate offsets and sizes for all
>> supported registers.
>> (I386_NTO_SIGCONTEXT_OFFSET): Remove macro definition.
>> (i386nto_sigcontext_addr): Use better method of retrieving sigcontext
>> pointer.
>> (init_i386nto_ops): Remove i386_nto_target.
>> (i386nto_init_abi): Remove nto_svr4_so_ops indirection. Properly setup
>> tdep params sc_reg_offset and sc_num_regs. Remove nto_svr4_so_ops and
>> make changes accordingly.
>
> I won't pretend I understand everything you do in this patch, but
> the pieces that are related to registers and sigcontext seem to be
> sensible.
>
> However, I found a few hunks which I think are not related to XMM
> register support, but rather to shared library support...
Attached is "clean" XMM support patch.
Thanks,
--
Aleksandar Ristovski
QNX Software Systems
ChangeLog:
Add support for XMM registers.
* i386-nto-tdep.c (i386nto_regset_id): Add case for SSE
register set.
(i386nto_register_area): Correctly calculate offsets and
sizes for
all supported registers.
[-- Attachment #2: i386-nto-tdep.c-20090611.patch --]
[-- Type: text/plain, Size: 4028 bytes --]
Index: gdb/i386-nto-tdep.c
===================================================================
RCS file: /cvs/src/src/gdb/i386-nto-tdep.c,v
retrieving revision 1.32
diff -u -p -r1.32 i386-nto-tdep.c
--- gdb/i386-nto-tdep.c 22 Feb 2009 01:02:17 -0000 1.32
+++ gdb/i386-nto-tdep.c 11 Jun 2009 15:25:14 -0000
@@ -126,6 +126,8 @@ i386nto_regset_id (int regno)
return NTO_REG_GENERAL;
else if (regno < I386_NUM_GREGS + I386_NUM_FREGS)
return NTO_REG_FLOAT;
+ else if (regno < I386_SSE_NUM_REGS)
+ return NTO_REG_FLOAT; /* We store xmm registers in fxsave_area. */
return -1; /* Error. */
}
@@ -134,6 +136,7 @@ static int
i386nto_register_area (struct gdbarch *gdbarch,
int regno, int regset, unsigned *off)
{
+ struct gdbarch_tdep *tdep = gdbarch_tdep (gdbarch);
int len;
*off = 0;
@@ -149,30 +152,100 @@ i386nto_register_area (struct gdbarch *g
}
else if (regset == NTO_REG_FLOAT)
{
- unsigned off_adjust, regsize, regset_size;
+ unsigned off_adjust, regsize, regset_size, regno_base;
+ /* The following are flags indicating number in our fxsave_area. */
+ int first_four = (regno >= I387_FCTRL_REGNUM (tdep)
+ && regno <= I387_FISEG_REGNUM (tdep));
+ int second_four = (regno > I387_FISEG_REGNUM (tdep)
+ && regno <= I387_FOP_REGNUM (tdep));
+ int st_reg = (regno >= I387_ST0_REGNUM (tdep)
+ && regno < I387_ST0_REGNUM (tdep) + 8);
+ int xmm_reg = (regno >= I387_XMM0_REGNUM (tdep)
+ && regno < I387_MXCSR_REGNUM (tdep));
if (nto_cpuinfo_valid && nto_cpuinfo_flags | X86_CPU_FXSR)
{
off_adjust = 32;
regsize = 16;
regset_size = 512;
+ /* fxsave_area structure. */
+ if (first_four)
+ {
+ /* fpu_control_word, fpu_status_word, fpu_tag_word, fpu_operand
+ registers. */
+ regsize = 2; /* Two bytes each. */
+ off_adjust = 0;
+ regno_base = I387_FCTRL_REGNUM (tdep);
+ }
+ else if (second_four)
+ {
+ /* fpu_ip, fpu_cs, fpu_op, fpu_ds registers. */
+ regsize = 4;
+ off_adjust = 8;
+ regno_base = I387_FISEG_REGNUM (tdep) + 1;
+ }
+ else if (st_reg)
+ {
+ /* ST registers. */
+ regsize = 16;
+ off_adjust = 32;
+ regno_base = I387_ST0_REGNUM (tdep);
+ }
+ else if (xmm_reg)
+ {
+ /* XMM registers. */
+ regsize = 16;
+ off_adjust = 160;
+ regno_base = I387_XMM0_REGNUM (tdep);
+ }
+ else if (regno == I387_MXCSR_REGNUM (tdep))
+ {
+ regsize = 4;
+ off_adjust = 24;
+ regno_base = I387_MXCSR_REGNUM (tdep);
+ }
+ else
+ {
+ /* Whole regset. */
+ gdb_assert (regno == -1);
+ off_adjust = 0;
+ regno_base = 0;
+ regsize = regset_size;
+ }
}
else
{
- off_adjust = 28;
- regsize = 10;
- regset_size = 128;
+ regset_size = 108;
+ /* fsave_area structure. */
+ if (first_four || second_four)
+ {
+ /* fpu_control_word, ... , fpu_ds registers. */
+ regsize = 4;
+ off_adjust = 0;
+ regno_base = I387_FCTRL_REGNUM (tdep);
+ }
+ else if (st_reg)
+ {
+ /* One of ST registers. */
+ regsize = 10;
+ off_adjust = 7 * 4;
+ regno_base = I387_ST0_REGNUM (tdep);
+ }
+ else
+ {
+ /* Whole regset. */
+ gdb_assert (regno == -1);
+ off_adjust = 0;
+ regno_base = 0;
+ regsize = regset_size;
+ }
}
- if (regno == -1)
- return regset_size;
-
- *off = (regno - gdbarch_fp0_regnum (gdbarch)) * regsize + off_adjust;
- return 10;
- /* Why 10 instead of regsize? GDB only stores 10 bytes per FP
- register so if we're sending a register back to the target,
- we only want pdebug to write 10 bytes so as not to clobber
- the reserved 6 bytes in the fxsave structure. */
+ if (regno != -1)
+ *off = off_adjust + (regno - regno_base) * regsize;
+ else
+ *off = 0;
+ return regsize;
}
return -1;
}
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 8+ messages in thread* Re: [patch] i386-nto-tdep.c: Add support for xmm registers.
2009-06-11 15:32 ` Aleksandar Ristovski
@ 2009-06-11 15:37 ` Joel Brobecker
2009-06-11 17:13 ` Aleksandar Ristovski
2009-06-11 19:59 ` Mark Kettenis
1 sibling, 1 reply; 8+ messages in thread
From: Joel Brobecker @ 2009-06-11 15:37 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Aleksandar Ristovski; +Cc: gdb-patches
> Attached is "clean" XMM support patch.
Aaahhhh, thanks a lot, much easier to read!
> Add support for XMM registers.
> * i386-nto-tdep.c (i386nto_regset_id): Add case for SSE register set.
> (i386nto_register_area): Correctly calculate offsets and sizes for
> all supported registers.
OK.
--
Joel
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 8+ messages in thread
* Re: [patch] i386-nto-tdep.c: Add support for xmm registers.
2009-06-11 15:37 ` Joel Brobecker
@ 2009-06-11 17:13 ` Aleksandar Ristovski
0 siblings, 0 replies; 8+ messages in thread
From: Aleksandar Ristovski @ 2009-06-11 17:13 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gdb-patches
Joel Brobecker wrote:
>> Attached is "clean" XMM support patch.
>
> Aaahhhh, thanks a lot, much easier to read!
>
>> Add support for XMM registers.
>> * i386-nto-tdep.c (i386nto_regset_id): Add case for SSE register set.
>> (i386nto_register_area): Correctly calculate offsets and sizes for
>> all supported registers.
>
> OK.
>
Committed.
Thank you!
--
Aleksandar Ristovski
QNX Software Systems
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 8+ messages in thread
* Re: [patch] i386-nto-tdep.c: Add support for xmm registers.
2009-06-11 15:32 ` Aleksandar Ristovski
2009-06-11 15:37 ` Joel Brobecker
@ 2009-06-11 19:59 ` Mark Kettenis
2009-06-11 20:03 ` Aleksandar Ristovski
1 sibling, 1 reply; 8+ messages in thread
From: Mark Kettenis @ 2009-06-11 19:59 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: aristovski; +Cc: gdb-patches, brobecker
> From: Aleksandar Ristovski <aristovski@qnx.com>
> Date: Thu, 11 Jun 2009 11:31:53 -0400
>
> Thank you for reviewing the patch!
>
> Joel Brobecker wrote:
> >> Add support for XMM registers.
> >> * i386-nto-tdep.c (i386_nto_target): Remove definition.
> >> (i386nto_regset_id): Add case for SSE register set.
> >> (i386nto_register_area): Correctly calculate offsets and sizes for all
> >> supported registers.
> >> (I386_NTO_SIGCONTEXT_OFFSET): Remove macro definition.
> >> (i386nto_sigcontext_addr): Use better method of retrieving sigcontext
> >> pointer.
> >> (init_i386nto_ops): Remove i386_nto_target.
> >> (i386nto_init_abi): Remove nto_svr4_so_ops indirection. Properly setup
> >> tdep params sc_reg_offset and sc_num_regs. Remove nto_svr4_so_ops and
> >> make changes accordingly.
> >
> > I won't pretend I understand everything you do in this patch, but
> > the pieces that are related to registers and sigcontext seem to be
> > sensible.
> >
> > However, I found a few hunks which I think are not related to XMM
> > register support, but rather to shared library support...
>
> Attached is "clean" XMM support patch.
>
> Thanks,
>
> --
> Aleksandar Ristovski
> QNX Software Systems
>
> ChangeLog:
>
>
> Add support for XMM registers.
> * i386-nto-tdep.c (i386nto_regset_id): Add case for SSE
> register set.
> (i386nto_register_area): Correctly calculate offsets and
> sizes for
> all supported registers.
Looks reasonable to me (assuming the wrapped lines in the ChangeLog
are caused by your broken mail client).
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 8+ messages in thread
* Re: [patch] i386-nto-tdep.c: Add support for xmm registers.
2009-06-11 19:59 ` Mark Kettenis
@ 2009-06-11 20:03 ` Aleksandar Ristovski
0 siblings, 0 replies; 8+ messages in thread
From: Aleksandar Ristovski @ 2009-06-11 20:03 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gdb-patches; +Cc: Mark Kettenis, brobecker
Mark Kettenis wrote:
>
> Looks reasonable to me (assuming the wrapped lines in the ChangeLog
> are caused by your broken mail client).
>
Thanks Mark, Joel had already approved the patch (and I
already committed it).
Yes, the broken lines come from my copying the prepared
change log and pasting it into my mail client.
Thanks,
--
Aleksandar Ristovski
QNX Software Systems
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 8+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2009-06-11 20:03 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 8+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2009-05-27 19:20 [patch] i386-nto-tdep.c: Add support for xmm registers Aleksandar Ristovski
2009-06-09 2:23 ` Aleksandar Ristovski
2009-06-11 15:09 ` Joel Brobecker
2009-06-11 15:32 ` Aleksandar Ristovski
2009-06-11 15:37 ` Joel Brobecker
2009-06-11 17:13 ` Aleksandar Ristovski
2009-06-11 19:59 ` Mark Kettenis
2009-06-11 20:03 ` Aleksandar Ristovski
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox