Re: [PREC]RFA: Add the 'options' to record_beneath_to_wait

[Hui Zhu <teawater@gmail.com>]

On Fri, Aug 21, 2009 at 11:49, Michael Snyder<msnyder@vmware.com> wrote:
> Hui Zhu wrote:
>>
>> Hi,
>>
>> I found that there is a new argument of to_wait -- options.  But in
>> record_wait, it isn't put to record_beneath_to_wait.
>> So I make a patch for it.  And I test it with testsuit in ubuntu i386 is
>> OK.
>>
>> Please help me review it.
>
> Looks good, please check it in.
> Thanks!

Checked in.

Thanks,
Hui

>
>> prec-fix-record_wait_options.txt
>> 2009-08-21  Hui Zhu  <teawater@gmail.com>
>>
>>        * record.c (record_wait): Change the argument of
>>        record_beneath_to_wait to options.
>>
>> ---
>>  record.c |    4 ++--
>>  1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>>
>> --- a/record.c
>> +++ b/record.c
>> @@ -598,7 +598,7 @@ record_wait (struct target_ops *ops,
>>        {
>>          /* This is a single step.  */
>>          return record_beneath_to_wait (record_beneath_to_wait_ops,
>> -                                        ptid, status, 0);
>> +                                        ptid, status, options);
>>        }
>>       else
>>        {
>> @@ -609,7 +609,7 @@ record_wait (struct target_ops *ops,
>>          while (1)
>>            {
>>              ret = record_beneath_to_wait (record_beneath_to_wait_ops,
>> -                                           ptid, status, 0);
>> +                                           ptid, status, options);
>>
>>              if (status->kind == TARGET_WAITKIND_STOPPED
>>                  && status->value.sig == TARGET_SIGNAL_TRAP)
>
>