Re: [PREC]RFA: Add the 'options' to record_beneath_to_wait

[Michael Snyder <msnyder@vmware.com>]

Hui Zhu wrote:
> Hi,
> 
> I found that there is a new argument of to_wait -- options.  But in
> record_wait, it isn't put to record_beneath_to_wait.
> So I make a patch for it.  And I test it with testsuit in ubuntu i386 is OK.
> 
> Please help me review it.

Looks good, please check it in.
Thanks!

> prec-fix-record_wait_options.txt
> 2009-08-21  Hui Zhu  <teawater@gmail.com>
> 
> 	* record.c (record_wait): Change the argument of
> 	record_beneath_to_wait to options.
> 
> ---
>  record.c |    4 ++--
>  1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
> 
> --- a/record.c
> +++ b/record.c
> @@ -598,7 +598,7 @@ record_wait (struct target_ops *ops,
>  	{
>  	  /* This is a single step.  */
>  	  return record_beneath_to_wait (record_beneath_to_wait_ops,
> -					 ptid, status, 0);
> +					 ptid, status, options);
>  	}
>        else
>  	{
> @@ -609,7 +609,7 @@ record_wait (struct target_ops *ops,
>  	  while (1)
>  	    {
>  	      ret = record_beneath_to_wait (record_beneath_to_wait_ops,
> -					    ptid, status, 0);
> +					    ptid, status, options);
> 
>  	      if (status->kind == TARGET_WAITKIND_STOPPED
>  		  && status->value.sig == TARGET_SIGNAL_TRAP)