Re: [RFA/RFC Prec] Add Linux AMD64 process record support second version, (instruction set support) 1/3

[Hui Zhu <teawater@gmail.com>]

Ping.

On Tue, Jul 28, 2009 at 09:42, Hui Zhu<teawater@gmail.com> wrote:
> Hi Mark,
>
> Could you please help me review this patch?
>
> Thanks,
> Hui
>
> On Sun, Jul 26, 2009 at 06:00, Michael Snyder<msnyder@vmware.com> wrote:
>> Hui Zhu wrote:
>>>
>>> On Sat, Jul 18, 2009 at 07:53, Michael Snyder<msnyder@vmware.com> wrote:
>>
>>>> Mark Kettenis should approve it, though.
>>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> Thanks Michael.
>>>
>>> I update the patches according to your mail except changelog.  Because
>>> It sames that we just add * at the begin of the function name.
>>>
>>> Please help me review it.
>>>
>>> Thanks,
>>> Hui
>>>
>>> 2009-07-20  Hui Zhu  <teawater@gmail.com>
>>>
>>>        Add AMD64 process record instruction set support.
>>>
>>>        * i386-tdep.h (gdbarch_tdep): Add record_regmap for registers
>>>        because the AMD64's registers order in GDB is not same with
>>>        I386 instructions.
>>>        Add i386_syscall_record to be the syscall function handle
>>>        interface.
>>>        (record_i386_regnum): Number for record_regmap.
>>>        * i386-tdep.c (OT_QUAD): For 64 bits.
>>>        (i386_record_s): Add rex_x, rex_b, rip_offset and
>>>        popl_esp_hack for AMD64 instruction set. And regmap for
>>>        record_regmap.
>>>        (i386_record_lea_modrm_addr): Support AMD64 instruction set
>>>        64 bits lea.
>>>        (i386_record_lea_modrm): Ditto.
>>>        (i386_record_push): New function.  Record the execution log
>>>        of push.
>>>        (I386_RECORD_ARCH_LIST_ADD_REG): New macro to record the
>>>        register.
>>>        (i386_process_record): Support AMD64 instruction set.
>>>        amd64-tdep.c (amd64_record_regmap): For record_regmap.
>>>        (amd64_init_abi): Set amd64_record_regmap to record_regmap.
>>
>>        * amd64-tdep.c (...):
>>
>> Except for this small nit with the changelog,
>> I have no further issues with this patch.
>> Thanks for all your revisions (and your hard work)!
>>
>> Mark?  You have the final say...
>>
>>
>