Re: [RFA] Patch to fix "reverse-next" command error

[Hui Zhu <teawater@gmail.com>]

Ping.

On Mon, May 11, 2009 at 15:07, Hui Zhu<teawater@gmail.com> wrote:
> PING
>
> On Wed, May 6, 2009 at 14:00, Hui Zhu <teawater@gmail.com> wrote:
>> Hi Michael,
>>
>> I try this issue with cvs-head.  It still affect cvs-head.
>> And I try the patch, it can fix this issue.  It's time close to 7.0
>> branch.  So could you please help me review it?
>>
>> The attachment is the new patch follow cvs-head.
>>
>> 2009-05-06  Hui Zhu  <teawater@gmail.com>
>>
>>       * infrun.c (handle_inferior_event): Make inferior step if it
>>       stepping over a function call in reverse , and stop at the
>>       start address of the function.
>>
>> Thanks,
>> Hui
>>
>> On Thu, Jan 22, 2009 at 17:00, teawater <teawater@gmail.com> wrote:
>>> Hi guys,
>>>
>>> This patch is for bug in http://sourceware.org/ml/gdb/2009-01/msg00146.html
>>>
>>> This issue is because sometime the inferior is already in function
>>> start address (i.e. plt), set a breakpoint and continue will make
>>> "reverse-next" work error.
>>>
>>> This patch make inferior step if it reverse step and stop at the
>>> function start address.
>>> It tested OK with process record patch and testsuite gdb.twreverse in
>>> branch reverse-20081226-branch.
>>>
>>> 2009-01-22  Hui Zhu  <teawater@gmail.com>
>>>
>>>        * infrun.c (handle_inferior_event): Make inferior step if it
>>>        stepping over a function call in reverse , and stop at the
>>>        start address of the function.
>>>
>>> OK for mainline?
>>>
>>> Thanks,
>>> Hui
>>>
>>
>