From: teawater <teawater@gmail.com>
To: Marc Khouzam <marc.khouzam@ericsson.com>
Cc: Michael Snyder <msnyder@vmware.com>,
Pedro Alves <pedro@codesourcery.com>,
gdb-patches@sourceware.org
Subject: Re: [RFA] Patch to fix "reverse-next" command error
Date: Thu, 12 Feb 2009 02:59:00 -0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <daef60380902111858l3c60c4d3ha4a211b9442cf733@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <6D19CA8D71C89C43A057926FE0D4ADAA06E85695@ecamlmw720.eamcs.ericsson.se>
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 3383 bytes --]
Hi Marc,
I can't reproduce this issue with or without "fix-reverse-plt-error.txt".
(gdb) start
During symbol reading, DW_AT_name missing from DW_TAG_base_type.
Temporary breakpoint 1 at 0x8048385: file 2.c, line 4.
Starting program: /home/teawater/gdb/a.out
Temporary breakpoint 1, main () at 2.c:4
4 char* cptr = "Thread 1";
(gdb) record
(gdb) n
During symbol reading, incomplete CFI data; unspecified registers
(e.g., eax) at 0x8048382.
5 int b[2] = {5,8};
(gdb)
6 b[0] = 6; b[1] = 9;
(gdb)
7 printf("Thread 1, loop \n");
(gdb)
Thread 1, loop
8 printf("Thread 2, loop \n");
(gdb)
Thread 2, loop
9 printf("Thread 3, loop \n");
(gdb)
Thread 3, loop
10 return 1;
(gdb)
11 }
(gdb) rs
10 return 1;
(gdb)
9 printf("Thread 3, loop \n");
(gdb)
8 printf("Thread 2, loop \n");
(gdb)
7 printf("Thread 1, loop \n");
(gdb)
6 b[0] = 6; b[1] = 9;
(gdb)
5 int b[2] = {5,8};
(gdb)
No more reverse-execution history.
main () at 2.c:4
4 char* cptr = "Thread 1";
(gdb)
No more reverse-execution history.
main () at 2.c:4
4 char* cptr = "Thread 1";
(gdb)
Could you try it with CVS-head version and new Precord patch in attachment?
Thanks,
Hui
On Thu, Feb 12, 2009 at 03:55, Marc Khouzam <marc.khouzam@ericsson.com> wrote:
>> From: teawater [mailto:teawater@gmail.com]
>> Sent: Thursday, January 29, 2009 11:12 PM
>> To: Marc Khouzam
>> Cc: Michael Snyder; Pedro Alves; gdb-patches@sourceware.org
>> Subject: Re: [RFA] Patch to fix "reverse-next" command error
>>
>> Hi Marc,
>>
>> Could you please send more message about your issue?
>> >
>> > I just noticed I still have the problem of jumping library functions
>> > when using reverse-step. Seems ok for reverse-next.
>> >
>
> Was this still in my court? Sorry about that.
> Here is how I reproduced the problem:
>
>
> GNU gdb (GDB) 6.8.50.20090113-cvs
> Copyright (C) 2009 Free Software Foundation, Inc.
> License GPLv3+: GNU GPL version 3 or later
> <http://gnu.org/licenses/gpl.html>
> This is free software: you are free to change and redistribute it.
> There is NO WARRANTY, to the extent permitted by law. Type "show
> copying"
> and "show warranty" for details.
> This GDB was configured as "i686-pc-linux-gnu".
> For bug reporting instructions, please see:
> <http://www.gnu.org/software/gdb/bugs/>...
> (gdb) l
> 1 #include <stdio.h>
> 2 int main()
> 3 {
> 4 char* cptr = "Thread 1";
> 5 int b[2] = {5,8};
> 6 b[0] = 6; b[1] = 9;
> 7 printf("Thread 1, loop \n");
> 8 printf("Thread 2, loop \n");
> 9 printf("Thread 3, loop \n");
> 10 return 1;
> (gdb) b main
> Breakpoint 1 at 0x8048485: file a.cc, line 4.
> (gdb) r
> Starting program: /local/home/lmckhou/testing/a.out
>
> Breakpoint 1, main () at a.cc:4
> 4 char* cptr = "Thread 1";
> (gdb) record
> (gdb) n
> 5 int b[2] = {5,8};
> (gdb)
> 6 b[0] = 6; b[1] = 9;
> (gdb)
> 7 printf("Thread 1, loop \n");
> (gdb)
> Thread 1, loop
> 8 printf("Thread 2, loop \n");
> (gdb)
> Thread 2, loop
> 9 printf("Thread 3, loop \n");
> (gdb)
> Thread 3, loop
> 10 return 1;
> (gdb) rs
> 9 printf("Thread 3, loop \n");
> (gdb)
> 8 printf("Thread 2, loop \n");
> (gdb)
>
> No more reverse-execution history. <===== What about lines 7, 6, 5?
> main () at a.cc:4
> 4 char* cptr = "Thread 1";
>
>
[-- Attachment #2: prec.tar.bz2 --]
[-- Type: application/x-bzip2, Size: 24862 bytes --]
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2009-02-12 2:59 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 20+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2009-01-22 9:00 teawater
2009-01-27 17:15 ` Marc Khouzam
2009-01-27 23:31 ` Marc Khouzam
2009-01-30 16:25 ` teawater
2009-02-11 19:55 ` Marc Khouzam
2009-02-12 2:59 ` teawater [this message]
2009-02-13 16:07 ` Marc Khouzam
2009-02-16 10:26 ` teawater
2009-02-16 19:10 ` Marc Khouzam
2009-02-17 3:58 ` teawater
2009-02-17 13:10 ` teawater
2009-03-02 6:11 ` teawater
2009-05-06 6:01 ` Hui Zhu
2009-05-11 7:07 ` Hui Zhu
2009-06-09 2:18 ` Hui Zhu
2009-06-15 2:45 ` Michael Snyder
2009-06-15 6:47 ` Hui Zhu
2009-06-15 15:37 ` Marc Khouzam
2009-06-15 18:04 ` Michael Snyder
2009-06-18 23:56 ` Michael Snyder
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=daef60380902111858l3c60c4d3ha4a211b9442cf733@mail.gmail.com \
--to=teawater@gmail.com \
--cc=gdb-patches@sourceware.org \
--cc=marc.khouzam@ericsson.com \
--cc=msnyder@vmware.com \
--cc=pedro@codesourcery.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox