Re: [RFA] Patch to fix "reverse-next" command error

[teawater <teawater@gmail.com>]

Hi Marc,

Could you "wget
ftp://sourceware.org/pub/gdb/snapshots/current/gdb.tar.bz2" and patch
the patch in http://sourceware.org/ml/gdb-patches/2009-02/msg00344.html.


If you still get this issue.
Breakpoint 2, main () at a.cc:10
10          return 1;
(gdb) rs
9           printf("Thread 3, loop \n");
(gdb)
8           printf("Thread 2, loop \n");

#Before the last rs command call command "set debug infrun 1"

(gdb)

No more reverse-execution history.

And post all output to me.  It will help me a lot.  :)


Thanks,
Hui




On Mon, Feb 16, 2009 at 23:16, Marc Khouzam <marc.khouzam@ericsson.com> wrote:
>
>
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: teawater [mailto:teawater@gmail.com]
>> Sent: Monday, February 16, 2009 3:57 AM
>> To: Marc Khouzam
>> Cc: Michael Snyder; Pedro Alves; gdb-patches@sourceware.org
>> Subject: Re: [RFA] Patch to fix "reverse-next" command error
>>
>> Hi Marc,
>>
>> I try it again.  This test is still OK with me.  Could remove
>> stopped.diff patch and try it again?
>> Or send me a stopped.diff patch?
>
> The stopped.diff patch was just checked in.
> You will actually have to update record.c as it no longer
> compiles with those new changes (small fix needed.)
>
> I updated to today's HEAD and I still get the problem.
> How did you turn on those traces to debug the problem?
>
> Thanks
>
> Marc
>
>