Mirror of the gdb-patches mailing list
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Simon Marchi <simon.marchi@polymtl.ca>
To: Pedro Alves <palves@redhat.com>
Cc: gdb-patches@sourceware.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/4] Change field separator in gdbarch.sh
Date: Wed, 19 Apr 2017 04:03:00 -0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <c5376a499a1173219ef4494551d61d72@polymtl.ca> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1e5568c8-eead-c0b1-8b34-736b9b6ff5d0@redhat.com>

On 2017-04-18 16:20, Pedro Alves wrote:
> On 04/16/2017 03:14 PM, Simon Marchi wrote:
>> --- a/gdb/gdbarch.h
>> +++ b/gdb/gdbarch.h
>> @@ -129,7 +129,7 @@ extern void set_gdbarch_bits_big_endian (struct 
>> gdbarch *gdbarch, int bits_big_e
>> 
>>  /* Number of bits in a char or unsigned char for the target machine.
>>     Just like CHAR_BIT in <limits.h> but describes the target machine.
>> -   v:TARGET_CHAR_BIT:int:char_bit::::8 * sizeof (char):8::0:
>> +   v;TARGET_CHAR_BIT;int;char_bit;;;;8 * sizeof (char);8;;0;
> 
> BTW, do you know why does this bit appear in the .h file in the
> first place?

It's in gdbarch.h because gdbarch.sh thinks it's part of the comment 
above short_bit, so it gets copied verbatim to the .h.  I don't know why 
it's there though.  It seems like it's been there for a really long 
time, but has always been commented out.  I had not seen it before doing 
this patch, and didn't worry too much about it.

Perhaps it was seen as a possible extension in case someone would bother 
adding support for targets with non-8-bit-bytes?  If so, the 
addressable_memory_unit_size method kind of took that place.

Any better guess?

Simon


  reply	other threads:[~2017-04-19  4:03 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 24+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2017-04-16 14:14 [PATCH 0/4] Remove VEC (CORE_ADDR) Simon Marchi
2017-04-16 14:14 ` [PATCH 1/4] Change field separator in gdbarch.sh Simon Marchi
2017-04-18 20:17   ` Pedro Alves
2017-04-18 20:20   ` Pedro Alves
2017-04-19  4:03     ` Simon Marchi [this message]
2017-04-19 10:31       ` Pedro Alves
2017-04-16 14:14 ` [PATCH 3/4] Use std::vector in solib-target lm_info Simon Marchi
2017-04-18 20:18   ` Pedro Alves
2017-04-19  4:18     ` Simon Marchi
2017-04-19  4:30     ` [PATCH v2] " Simon Marchi
2017-04-30  0:35     ` [PATCH v3] Use std::vector in lm_info_target Simon Marchi
2017-04-30  0:42       ` Simon Marchi
2017-05-02 16:06         ` Pedro Alves
2017-05-02 16:12       ` Pedro Alves
2017-05-02 17:25         ` Simon Marchi
2017-05-02 17:37           ` Pedro Alves
2017-05-02 17:50             ` Simon Marchi
2017-04-16 14:14 ` [PATCH 4/4] Remove definition of VEC (CORE_ADDR) Simon Marchi
2017-04-18 20:18   ` Pedro Alves
2017-04-16 14:15 ` [PATCH 2/4] Change return type of gdbarch_software_single_step to vector<CORE_ADDR> Simon Marchi
2017-04-18 20:17   ` Pedro Alves
2017-04-19  4:08     ` Simon Marchi
2017-04-19 10:32       ` Pedro Alves
2017-05-02 17:35 ` [PATCH 0/4] Remove VEC (CORE_ADDR) Simon Marchi

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=c5376a499a1173219ef4494551d61d72@polymtl.ca \
    --to=simon.marchi@polymtl.ca \
    --cc=gdb-patches@sourceware.org \
    --cc=palves@redhat.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox