From: Jim Ingham <jingham@apple.com>
To: Daniel Jacobowitz <drow@false.org>
Cc: Bob Rossi <bob@brasko.net>, gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com
Subject: Re: RFC: MI output during program execution
Date: Wed, 10 Aug 2005 00:48:00 -0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <E16B4132-1144-4A6F-8F89-78FBE1898446@apple.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20050810004200.GB4264@nevyn.them.org>
On Aug 9, 2005, at 5:42 PM, Daniel Jacobowitz wrote:
> On Tue, Aug 09, 2005 at 11:34:34AM -0700, Jim Ingham wrote:
>
>>> How does -interpreter-exec console work in the case when the user
>>> executes a command, that makes up several other commands?
>>>
>>> define mess_with_mi_people
>>> b main
>>> r
>>> n
>>> n
>>> end
>>>
>>> I don't think this case would currently work as expected. Would it?
>>>
>>
>> Remember that only one "run the target" command is allowed in a CLI
>> define. All the others are ignored.
>>
>
> This is true (and documented, I think), but I still consider it a bug.
> It's just a particularly rotten one.
I agree, and it was filed as one by one of our users here... I
looked a bit into what it would take to fix it and it was not
pretty. Particularly for breakpoint commands, where it looked like
it would require some serious surgery.
Jim
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2005-08-10 0:48 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 83+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
[not found] <1123605445.30442.ezmlm@sources.redhat.com>
2005-08-09 17:24 ` Jim Ingham
2005-08-09 17:59 ` Bob Rossi
2005-08-09 18:09 ` Jim Ingham
2005-08-09 18:23 ` Bob Rossi
2005-08-09 18:40 ` Jim Ingham
2005-08-10 0:48 ` Daniel Jacobowitz
2005-08-10 0:48 ` Jim Ingham [this message]
2005-08-10 2:37 ` Daniel Jacobowitz
2005-08-09 18:13 ` Eli Zaretskii
2005-08-09 18:23 ` Bob Rossi
2005-08-09 19:39 ` Eli Zaretskii
2005-08-10 0:41 ` Bob Rossi
2005-08-10 0:42 ` Daniel Jacobowitz
2005-08-10 1:07 ` Bob Rossi
2005-08-10 2:37 ` Jim Ingham
2005-08-12 8:06 ` Bob Rossi
2005-08-12 10:36 ` Eli Zaretskii
2005-08-12 12:05 ` Bob Rossi
2005-08-12 17:25 ` Eli Zaretskii
2005-08-12 20:45 ` Bob Rossi
2005-08-12 20:49 ` Daniel Jacobowitz
2005-08-13 1:11 ` Bob Rossi
2005-08-13 1:15 ` Daniel Jacobowitz
2005-08-13 11:07 ` Eli Zaretskii
2005-08-12 20:54 ` Mark Kettenis
2005-08-13 15:05 ` Bob Rossi
2005-08-12 21:01 ` Daniel Jacobowitz
2005-08-13 11:13 ` Eli Zaretskii
2005-08-12 17:03 ` Jim Ingham
2005-08-13 0:33 ` Bob Rossi
2005-08-13 0:44 ` Jim Ingham
2005-08-13 5:04 ` Bob Rossi
2005-08-13 6:47 ` Daniel Jacobowitz
2005-08-13 11:06 ` Jim Ingham
2005-08-13 14:51 ` Bob Rossi
2005-08-13 16:55 ` Daniel Jacobowitz
2005-08-13 12:53 ` Eli Zaretskii
2005-08-13 21:52 ` Mark Kettenis
2005-08-13 0:22 ` Daniel Jacobowitz
2005-08-11 10:10 ` Daniel Jacobowitz
2005-08-18 13:28 Nick Roberts
2005-08-19 0:52 ` Mark Kettenis
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2005-08-17 3:18 Nick Roberts
[not found] <1124238360.5670.ezmlm@sources.redhat.com>
2005-08-17 1:10 ` Jim Ingham
2005-08-15 2:15 Nick Roberts
2005-08-15 2:13 Nick Roberts
2005-08-15 4:26 ` Daniel Jacobowitz
2005-08-15 10:03 ` Nick Roberts
2005-08-16 0:04 ` Bob Rossi
2005-08-16 0:33 ` Nick Roberts
2005-08-16 0:43 ` Daniel Jacobowitz
2005-08-16 3:54 ` Bob Rossi
2005-08-08 5:20 Nick Roberts
2005-08-08 13:05 ` Daniel Jacobowitz
2005-08-08 18:23 ` Jim Ingham
2005-08-09 17:32 ` Nick Roberts
2005-08-21 22:09 ` Nick Roberts
2005-08-24 2:20 ` Stan Shebs
2005-08-24 16:59 ` Nick Roberts
2005-08-24 20:15 ` Jim Ingham
2005-08-24 20:48 ` Nick Roberts
2005-08-27 12:09 ` Stan Shebs
2005-09-12 3:20 ` Nick Roberts
2005-09-12 3:40 ` Daniel Jacobowitz
2005-09-19 10:30 ` Nick Roberts
2005-09-19 13:17 ` Daniel Jacobowitz
2005-09-19 22:12 ` Nick Roberts
2005-09-19 22:17 ` Nick Roberts
2005-09-19 22:32 ` Daniel Jacobowitz
2005-10-03 3:20 ` Nick Roberts
2005-10-03 13:18 ` Daniel Jacobowitz
2005-10-03 20:28 ` Nick Roberts
2005-10-03 20:31 ` Daniel Jacobowitz
2005-10-03 21:39 ` Stan Shebs
2005-10-03 21:50 ` Jim Ingham
2005-10-03 21:59 ` Daniel Jacobowitz
2005-10-03 22:01 ` Daniel Jacobowitz
2006-03-28 0:40 ` Nick Roberts
2006-03-28 22:12 ` Daniel Jacobowitz
2006-03-28 22:36 ` Nick Roberts
2006-03-28 23:13 ` Daniel Jacobowitz
2005-08-08 21:00 ` Eli Zaretskii
2005-08-09 17:52 ` Nick Roberts
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=E16B4132-1144-4A6F-8F89-78FBE1898446@apple.com \
--to=jingham@apple.com \
--cc=bob@brasko.net \
--cc=drow@false.org \
--cc=gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox