Re: RFC: MI output during program execution

[Nick Roberts <nickrob@snap.net.nz>]

 > As you've no doubt noticed, we have lots of intermingled local
 > changes, so it's going to be a long hard process to contribute
 > everything. While (IMHO) at least 95% of our local changes are
 > of interest for FSF GDB, the context diff alone (no new files,
 > no configury diffs) is 125Kloc! So we'll be most grateful for
 > any help you can lend. I myself have been working on a patch
 > for the basic native configuration, which will help break some
 > of the contribution logjam by enabling testing on Darwin instead
 > of Linux or some other config.

I'm only considering merging the event notification in in MI.  I realise this
probably involves other files such as infrun.c but hopefully these changes
can be separated from more extensive ones that you may have made.

 > >Could you please tell me where you think the best place to start would be?
 > >I guess CVS would be better than a tarball.  Would it be best to wait until
 > >Stan & Klee have completed their merge?
 > >
 > Anything you do now will be of value, I don't think our MI stuff
 > has churned a whole lot, but I would like to put out a drop of
 > our latest mostly-working CVS anyway, since it's merged up to FSF
 > sources as of a few days ago, plus most of the local changes have
 > been at least categorized by purpose. I can't think of any obstacles,
 > but as a "newbie" in Apple GDB :-) , I need to find out what I can do.

Presumably I can pick this merge from CVS (I've already checked out the current
source).  Did you tag the merge?  Is it gdb-424?

I have heard that Apple are moving MacOSX over to Intel architecture.  Is it
possible to get a copy of Darwin (or even a preview of MacOSX) for Intel so
that I can put it on a partition on my PC?  That way I can compare the output
of my merged version of FSF GDB with that of Apple GDB.

Nick