From: Jim Ingham <jingham@apple.com>
To: gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com
Subject: Re: RFC: MI output during program execution
Date: Wed, 17 Aug 2005 01:10:00 -0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <6C1EAFFF-0F76-43C9-AAD7-A6A143D9C3D2@apple.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1124238360.5670.ezmlm@sources.redhat.com>
Note that for a truly asynchronous target, what you get is:
(gdb)
-exec-continue
^running
(gdb)
-exec-status
^done,status="running"
(gdb)
-exec-interrupt
^done,reason="signal-received",signal-name="SIGINT",signal-
meaning="Interrupt",thread-id="1"
(gdb)
Or something like that... So in that case the ^running really is the
equivalent of the ^done...
Jim
On Aug 16, 2005, at 5:26 PM, gdb-patches-digest-
help@sources.redhat.com wrote:
>
>
> Yeah - I'm beginning to think that we should use this:
>
> (gdb)
> -exec-continue
> *running
> ^done
> (gdb)
>
> Instead of the current:
>
> (gdb)
> -exec-continue
> ^running
> (gdb)
>
> It'd definitely have to be mi3 only, though! This would be a pretty
> big change that frontends would have to adapt to.
>
> The asymmetry between ^running and *stopped will bite us here. For
> instance, for a CLI command, I'd want roughly:
>
> (gdb)
> -interpreter-exec console "continue"
> *running
> ^done
> (gdb)
>
> Anyway, food for thought.
>
> --
> Daniel Jacobowitz
> CodeSourcery, LLC
>
next parent reply other threads:[~2005-08-17 0:37 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 83+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
[not found] <1124238360.5670.ezmlm@sources.redhat.com>
2005-08-17 1:10 ` Jim Ingham [this message]
2005-08-18 13:28 Nick Roberts
2005-08-19 0:52 ` Mark Kettenis
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2005-08-17 3:18 Nick Roberts
2005-08-15 2:15 Nick Roberts
2005-08-15 2:13 Nick Roberts
2005-08-15 4:26 ` Daniel Jacobowitz
2005-08-15 10:03 ` Nick Roberts
2005-08-16 0:04 ` Bob Rossi
2005-08-16 0:33 ` Nick Roberts
2005-08-16 0:43 ` Daniel Jacobowitz
2005-08-16 3:54 ` Bob Rossi
[not found] <1123605445.30442.ezmlm@sources.redhat.com>
2005-08-09 17:24 ` Jim Ingham
2005-08-09 17:59 ` Bob Rossi
2005-08-09 18:09 ` Jim Ingham
2005-08-09 18:23 ` Bob Rossi
2005-08-09 18:40 ` Jim Ingham
2005-08-10 0:48 ` Daniel Jacobowitz
2005-08-10 0:48 ` Jim Ingham
2005-08-10 2:37 ` Daniel Jacobowitz
2005-08-09 18:13 ` Eli Zaretskii
2005-08-09 18:23 ` Bob Rossi
2005-08-09 19:39 ` Eli Zaretskii
2005-08-10 0:41 ` Bob Rossi
2005-08-10 0:42 ` Daniel Jacobowitz
2005-08-10 1:07 ` Bob Rossi
2005-08-10 2:37 ` Jim Ingham
2005-08-12 8:06 ` Bob Rossi
2005-08-12 10:36 ` Eli Zaretskii
2005-08-12 12:05 ` Bob Rossi
2005-08-12 17:25 ` Eli Zaretskii
2005-08-12 20:45 ` Bob Rossi
2005-08-12 20:49 ` Daniel Jacobowitz
2005-08-13 1:11 ` Bob Rossi
2005-08-13 1:15 ` Daniel Jacobowitz
2005-08-13 11:07 ` Eli Zaretskii
2005-08-12 20:54 ` Mark Kettenis
2005-08-13 15:05 ` Bob Rossi
2005-08-12 21:01 ` Daniel Jacobowitz
2005-08-13 11:13 ` Eli Zaretskii
2005-08-12 17:03 ` Jim Ingham
2005-08-13 0:33 ` Bob Rossi
2005-08-13 0:44 ` Jim Ingham
2005-08-13 5:04 ` Bob Rossi
2005-08-13 6:47 ` Daniel Jacobowitz
2005-08-13 11:06 ` Jim Ingham
2005-08-13 14:51 ` Bob Rossi
2005-08-13 16:55 ` Daniel Jacobowitz
2005-08-13 12:53 ` Eli Zaretskii
2005-08-13 21:52 ` Mark Kettenis
2005-08-13 0:22 ` Daniel Jacobowitz
2005-08-11 10:10 ` Daniel Jacobowitz
2005-08-08 5:20 Nick Roberts
2005-08-08 13:05 ` Daniel Jacobowitz
2005-08-08 18:23 ` Jim Ingham
2005-08-09 17:32 ` Nick Roberts
2005-08-21 22:09 ` Nick Roberts
2005-08-24 2:20 ` Stan Shebs
2005-08-24 16:59 ` Nick Roberts
2005-08-24 20:15 ` Jim Ingham
2005-08-24 20:48 ` Nick Roberts
2005-08-27 12:09 ` Stan Shebs
2005-09-12 3:20 ` Nick Roberts
2005-09-12 3:40 ` Daniel Jacobowitz
2005-09-19 10:30 ` Nick Roberts
2005-09-19 13:17 ` Daniel Jacobowitz
2005-09-19 22:12 ` Nick Roberts
2005-09-19 22:17 ` Nick Roberts
2005-09-19 22:32 ` Daniel Jacobowitz
2005-10-03 3:20 ` Nick Roberts
2005-10-03 13:18 ` Daniel Jacobowitz
2005-10-03 20:28 ` Nick Roberts
2005-10-03 20:31 ` Daniel Jacobowitz
2005-10-03 21:39 ` Stan Shebs
2005-10-03 21:50 ` Jim Ingham
2005-10-03 21:59 ` Daniel Jacobowitz
2005-10-03 22:01 ` Daniel Jacobowitz
2006-03-28 0:40 ` Nick Roberts
2006-03-28 22:12 ` Daniel Jacobowitz
2006-03-28 22:36 ` Nick Roberts
2006-03-28 23:13 ` Daniel Jacobowitz
2005-08-08 21:00 ` Eli Zaretskii
2005-08-09 17:52 ` Nick Roberts
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=6C1EAFFF-0F76-43C9-AAD7-A6A143D9C3D2@apple.com \
--to=jingham@apple.com \
--cc=gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox