From: Mark Kettenis <mark.kettenis@xs4all.nl>
To: drow@false.org
Cc: jingham@apple.com, gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com, eliz@gnu.org
Subject: Re: RFC: MI output during program execution
Date: Sat, 13 Aug 2005 21:52:00 -0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <200508132141.j7DLfLAW019994@elgar.sibelius.xs4all.nl> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20050813050414.GA7717@nevyn.them.org> (message from Daniel Jacobowitz on Sat, 13 Aug 2005 01:04:14 -0400)
> Date: Sat, 13 Aug 2005 01:04:14 -0400
> From: Daniel Jacobowitz <drow@false.org>
>
> Or do as I described earlier today, and add a new mechanism
> specifically designed to notify interpreters of events that could be
> interesting (which might meet Eli's concerns about misusing observers,
> but we'd have to ask him!), or else call into the MI interpreter
> directly from the code without messing with any kind of mechanism.
Let's not add any new mechanisms before we've removed all traces of
the deprecated ones shall we?
Mark
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2005-08-13 21:41 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 83+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
[not found] <1123605445.30442.ezmlm@sources.redhat.com>
2005-08-09 17:24 ` Jim Ingham
2005-08-09 17:59 ` Bob Rossi
2005-08-09 18:09 ` Jim Ingham
2005-08-09 18:23 ` Bob Rossi
2005-08-09 18:40 ` Jim Ingham
2005-08-10 0:48 ` Daniel Jacobowitz
2005-08-10 0:48 ` Jim Ingham
2005-08-10 2:37 ` Daniel Jacobowitz
2005-08-09 18:13 ` Eli Zaretskii
2005-08-09 18:23 ` Bob Rossi
2005-08-09 19:39 ` Eli Zaretskii
2005-08-10 0:41 ` Bob Rossi
2005-08-10 0:42 ` Daniel Jacobowitz
2005-08-10 1:07 ` Bob Rossi
2005-08-10 2:37 ` Jim Ingham
2005-08-12 8:06 ` Bob Rossi
2005-08-12 10:36 ` Eli Zaretskii
2005-08-12 12:05 ` Bob Rossi
2005-08-12 17:25 ` Eli Zaretskii
2005-08-12 20:45 ` Bob Rossi
2005-08-12 20:49 ` Daniel Jacobowitz
2005-08-13 1:11 ` Bob Rossi
2005-08-13 1:15 ` Daniel Jacobowitz
2005-08-13 11:07 ` Eli Zaretskii
2005-08-12 20:54 ` Mark Kettenis
2005-08-13 15:05 ` Bob Rossi
2005-08-12 21:01 ` Daniel Jacobowitz
2005-08-13 11:13 ` Eli Zaretskii
2005-08-12 17:03 ` Jim Ingham
2005-08-13 0:33 ` Bob Rossi
2005-08-13 0:44 ` Jim Ingham
2005-08-13 5:04 ` Bob Rossi
2005-08-13 6:47 ` Daniel Jacobowitz
2005-08-13 11:06 ` Jim Ingham
2005-08-13 14:51 ` Bob Rossi
2005-08-13 16:55 ` Daniel Jacobowitz
2005-08-13 12:53 ` Eli Zaretskii
2005-08-13 21:52 ` Mark Kettenis [this message]
2005-08-13 0:22 ` Daniel Jacobowitz
2005-08-11 10:10 ` Daniel Jacobowitz
2005-08-18 13:28 Nick Roberts
2005-08-19 0:52 ` Mark Kettenis
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2005-08-17 3:18 Nick Roberts
[not found] <1124238360.5670.ezmlm@sources.redhat.com>
2005-08-17 1:10 ` Jim Ingham
2005-08-15 2:15 Nick Roberts
2005-08-15 2:13 Nick Roberts
2005-08-15 4:26 ` Daniel Jacobowitz
2005-08-15 10:03 ` Nick Roberts
2005-08-16 0:04 ` Bob Rossi
2005-08-16 0:33 ` Nick Roberts
2005-08-16 0:43 ` Daniel Jacobowitz
2005-08-16 3:54 ` Bob Rossi
2005-08-08 5:20 Nick Roberts
2005-08-08 13:05 ` Daniel Jacobowitz
2005-08-08 18:23 ` Jim Ingham
2005-08-09 17:32 ` Nick Roberts
2005-08-21 22:09 ` Nick Roberts
2005-08-24 2:20 ` Stan Shebs
2005-08-24 16:59 ` Nick Roberts
2005-08-24 20:15 ` Jim Ingham
2005-08-24 20:48 ` Nick Roberts
2005-08-27 12:09 ` Stan Shebs
2005-09-12 3:20 ` Nick Roberts
2005-09-12 3:40 ` Daniel Jacobowitz
2005-09-19 10:30 ` Nick Roberts
2005-09-19 13:17 ` Daniel Jacobowitz
2005-09-19 22:12 ` Nick Roberts
2005-09-19 22:17 ` Nick Roberts
2005-09-19 22:32 ` Daniel Jacobowitz
2005-10-03 3:20 ` Nick Roberts
2005-10-03 13:18 ` Daniel Jacobowitz
2005-10-03 20:28 ` Nick Roberts
2005-10-03 20:31 ` Daniel Jacobowitz
2005-10-03 21:39 ` Stan Shebs
2005-10-03 21:50 ` Jim Ingham
2005-10-03 21:59 ` Daniel Jacobowitz
2005-10-03 22:01 ` Daniel Jacobowitz
2006-03-28 0:40 ` Nick Roberts
2006-03-28 22:12 ` Daniel Jacobowitz
2006-03-28 22:36 ` Nick Roberts
2006-03-28 23:13 ` Daniel Jacobowitz
2005-08-08 21:00 ` Eli Zaretskii
2005-08-09 17:52 ` Nick Roberts
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=200508132141.j7DLfLAW019994@elgar.sibelius.xs4all.nl \
--to=mark.kettenis@xs4all.nl \
--cc=drow@false.org \
--cc=eliz@gnu.org \
--cc=gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com \
--cc=jingham@apple.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox