Re: [patch] Set calling convention of methods

[Jonas Maebe <jonas.maebe@elis.ugent.be>]

On 30 Sep 2009, at 19:32, Joel Brobecker wrote:

>> Jonas> Later on, Tom clarified that he thought that the gdb and gcc  
>> versions
>> Jonas> of dwarf2.h should actually be merged into a single copy,  
>> but that I
>> Jonas> shouldn't worry about this since the divergence started  
>> before my
>> Jonas> patch: http://sourceware.org/ml/gdb-patches/2009-04/msg00099.html
>>
>> I've merged these now.
>>
>> I think the usual approach for such merged files is that GCC is the
>> master copy.
>
> Confirmed. It's written plain as day in the header.  The sticky part
> is that Jonas does NOT have copyright assignment on file for GCC, as
> far as I can tell...

I've pinged my dwarf2.h thrice on the gcc-patches list in the mean  
time (always inline, because it doesn't contain any lines >= 80  
chars), the last time mentioning that I now also have a copyright  
assignment on file for GCC. I haven received so much as an  
acknowledgment.

Here's the last ping I did: http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2009-10/msg01788.html 
  (it's only from Friday, but given my past experiences, I don't  
expect it suddenly to be picked up after getting buried under a couple  
days extra mail).

I don't know what else to do.


Jonas