Re: [patch] Set calling convention of methods

[Mark Kettenis <mark.kettenis@xs4all.nl>]

> From: Jonas Maebe <jonas.maebe@elis.ugent.be>
> Date: Wed, 22 Apr 2009 19:45:22 +0200
> 
> On 20 Apr 2009, at 20:25, Tom Tromey wrote:
> 
> > "dwarf2.h" is not included in many places in gdb, and not by any
> > header.  So, assuming your uses of this field will end up in truly
> > generic code, I think the thing to do is introduce a new enum, and
> > then translate values in the DWARF reader.  It is tempting to simply
> > reuse the DWARF enum internally, but I think that goes against the GDB
> > style.
> 
> Ok, I can adapt my patch to clean that up. I'd prefer my i386 Borland  
> fastcall patch to be committed first though, since changing this  
> calling convention stuff would also affect that patch. Is that  
> possible given my current in-progress state as far as the copyright  
> assignment process is concerned? If so, Mark, could you tell me  
> whether anything should still be changed in the last version I sent you?

That last diff is ok with me, but Tom has a point here.  The effect on
the i386-specific bits should be fairly minimal.

The copyright assignment process needs to be dealt with before we move
forward though.