From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 7168 invoked by alias); 3 Nov 2009 09:43:20 -0000 Received: (qmail 7158 invoked by uid 22791); 3 Nov 2009 09:43:20 -0000 X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-1.4 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_20 X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from smtp3.ugent.be (HELO smtp3.UGent.be) (157.193.49.127) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.43rc1) with ESMTP; Tue, 03 Nov 2009 09:43:15 +0000 Received: from localhost (mcheck2.ugent.be [157.193.49.249]) by smtp3.UGent.be (Postfix) with ESMTP id 07D1814787F; Tue, 3 Nov 2009 10:43:12 +0100 (CET) Received: from smtp3.UGent.be ([157.193.49.127]) by localhost (mcheck2.ugent.be [157.193.43.11]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id zRDNGxMW7eaz; Tue, 3 Nov 2009 10:43:09 +0100 (CET) Received: from mail.elis.ugent.be (mail.elis.UGent.be [157.193.206.48]) by smtp3.UGent.be (Postfix) with ESMTP id 48E591478A5; Tue, 3 Nov 2009 10:43:09 +0100 (CET) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mail.elis.ugent.be (Postfix) with ESMTP id EE112918F10; Tue, 3 Nov 2009 10:43:08 +0100 (CET) Received: from mail.elis.ugent.be ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (mail.elis.ugent.be [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id gWMOUolxHJPz; Tue, 3 Nov 2009 10:43:05 +0100 (CET) Received: from bigmac.elis.UGent.be (bigmac.elis.UGent.be [157.193.206.33]) by mail.elis.ugent.be (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9EB9F918F2C; Tue, 3 Nov 2009 10:43:05 +0100 (CET) Cc: Tom Tromey , Mark Kettenis , gdb-patches@sourceware.org Message-Id: From: Jonas Maebe To: Joel Brobecker In-Reply-To: <20090930173230.GG10338@adacore.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed; delsp=yes Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v935.3) Subject: Re: [patch] Set calling convention of methods Date: Tue, 03 Nov 2009 09:43:00 -0000 References: <7B6EF4DA-76C8-4D9C-8B9F-94153EF1C4E1@elis.ugent.be> <691B0BA8-C606-42FF-A796-76CC9C31556A@elis.ugent.be> <200904222215.n3MMF0p2006994@brahms.sibelius.xs4all.nl> <19C107AA-5271-4C23-A6D2-AFF75BBAC4E4@elis.ugent.be> <5AA3BCA9-1ECF-446E-8B49-3132F0E470FB@elis.ugent.be> <20090930000225.GA10338@adacore.com> <8F3B6095-4766-432D-ABB5-AB4DAA2D5572@elis.ugent.be> <20090930173230.GG10338@adacore.com> X-j-chkmail-Enveloppe: 4AEFFB2C.004/157.193.206.48/mail.elis.UGent.be/mail.elis.ugent.be/ X-j-chkmail-Score: MSGID : 4AEFFB2C.004 on smtp3.UGent.be : j-chkmail score : . : R=. U=. O=. B=0.000 -> S=0.000 X-j-chkmail-Status: Ham Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sourceware.org X-SW-Source: 2009-11/txt/msg00046.txt.bz2 On 30 Sep 2009, at 19:32, Joel Brobecker wrote: >> Jonas> Later on, Tom clarified that he thought that the gdb and gcc >> versions >> Jonas> of dwarf2.h should actually be merged into a single copy, >> but that I >> Jonas> shouldn't worry about this since the divergence started >> before my >> Jonas> patch: http://sourceware.org/ml/gdb-patches/2009-04/msg00099.html >> >> I've merged these now. >> >> I think the usual approach for such merged files is that GCC is the >> master copy. > > Confirmed. It's written plain as day in the header. The sticky part > is that Jonas does NOT have copyright assignment on file for GCC, as > far as I can tell... I've pinged my dwarf2.h thrice on the gcc-patches list in the mean time (always inline, because it doesn't contain any lines >= 80 chars), the last time mentioning that I now also have a copyright assignment on file for GCC. I haven received so much as an acknowledgment. Here's the last ping I did: http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2009-10/msg01788.html (it's only from Friday, but given my past experiences, I don't expect it suddenly to be picked up after getting buried under a couple days extra mail). I don't know what else to do. Jonas