From: Tristan Gingold <gingold@adacore.com>
To: Tom Tromey <tromey@redhat.com>
Cc: Pedro Alves <palves@redhat.com>,
Jan Kratochvil <jan.kratochvil@redhat.com>,
"gdb-patches\@sourceware.org ml" <gdb-patches@sourceware.org>
Subject: Re: RFA: Try to include libunwind-ia64.h in libunwind-frame.h
Date: Wed, 22 Feb 2012 07:56:00 -0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <D11BCBC3-2324-4554-B218-02FB4E4468D9@adacore.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <87sji4t5xy.fsf@fleche.redhat.com>
On Feb 21, 2012, at 7:08 PM, Tom Tromey wrote:
>>>>>> "Pedro" == Pedro Alves <palves@redhat.com> writes:
>
> Pedro> Besides, you can't make libunwind-frame.c ia64-exclusive
> Pedro> (whatever that means, though I assume basically file and function
> Pedro> renaming) without fixing the libunwind.h header problem.
>
> I mostly tuned out of this thread, but I am curious to know if someone
> has a reason we would ever want to expand our use of libunwind.
> Does it provide some benefit over gdb's built-in unwinders?
From what I understand, libunwind doesn't handle endianness, so I think the cross support is somewhat weak.
Tristan.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2012-02-22 7:44 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 38+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2012-02-02 16:32 Tristan Gingold
2012-02-10 12:31 ` Jan Kratochvil
2012-02-10 13:15 ` Tristan Gingold
2012-02-10 13:21 ` Jan Kratochvil
2012-02-10 13:27 ` Joel Brobecker
2012-02-10 13:45 ` Tristan Gingold
2012-02-10 14:04 ` Tristan Gingold
2012-02-10 14:09 ` Jan Kratochvil
2012-02-10 14:14 ` Tristan Gingold
2012-02-10 18:27 ` Jan Kratochvil
2012-02-10 18:34 ` Pedro Alves
2012-02-10 18:44 ` Jan Kratochvil
2012-02-10 18:59 ` Pedro Alves
2012-02-10 19:38 ` Jan Kratochvil
2012-02-11 14:10 ` Jan Kratochvil
2012-02-13 8:41 ` Tristan Gingold
2012-02-13 18:58 ` Pedro Alves
2012-02-13 19:03 ` Jan Kratochvil
2012-02-13 19:20 ` Pedro Alves
2012-02-13 19:27 ` Jan Kratochvil
2012-02-13 20:05 ` Pedro Alves
2012-02-14 7:28 ` Jan Kratochvil
2012-02-14 12:14 ` Pedro Alves
2012-02-14 14:36 ` Jan Kratochvil
2012-02-14 14:53 ` Pedro Alves
2012-02-20 20:54 ` Jan Kratochvil
2012-02-20 22:30 ` Pedro Alves
2012-02-20 22:37 ` Joel Brobecker
2012-02-20 22:39 ` Joel Brobecker
2012-02-20 22:57 ` Pedro Alves
2012-02-20 23:20 ` Joel Brobecker
2012-02-21 6:48 ` Jan Kratochvil
2012-02-21 13:36 ` Pedro Alves
2012-02-21 19:10 ` Tom Tromey
2012-02-22 7:56 ` Tristan Gingold [this message]
2012-02-22 14:52 ` Jan Kratochvil
2012-02-21 20:18 ` Jan Kratochvil
2012-02-21 20:43 ` Pedro Alves
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=D11BCBC3-2324-4554-B218-02FB4E4468D9@adacore.com \
--to=gingold@adacore.com \
--cc=gdb-patches@sourceware.org \
--cc=jan.kratochvil@redhat.com \
--cc=palves@redhat.com \
--cc=tromey@redhat.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox