Mirror of the gdb-patches mailing list
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Eric Christopher <echristo@gmail.com>
To: Christian Biesinger <cbiesinger@google.com>
Cc: Dave Blaikie <dblaikie@gmail.com>, Douglas Evans <dje@google.com>,
	Pedro Alves <palves@redhat.com>,
		gdb-patches <gdb-patches@sourceware.org>
Subject: Re: [patch] [gdb/testsuite] XFAIL under Clang tests using label debug info
Date: Fri, 06 Sep 2019 04:17:00 -0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <CALehDX6gMO3FRETrqARXEQN1wqX6kVL7Ay3Nc8Anz1OfzfBYPA@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAPTJ0XEz3z6eQAuzDLc-SnSm29pzm2fsND2nP5U5GYyPbgkc9Q@mail.gmail.com>

https://bugs.llvm.org/show_bug.cgi?id=14500#c3 has the relevant information
:)

On Thu, Sep 5, 2019, 7:48 PM Christian Biesinger via gdb-patches <
gdb-patches@sourceware.org> wrote:

> On Thu, Sep 5, 2019 at 5:12 PM David Blaikie <dblaikie@gmail.com> wrote:
> >
> > Clang now supports labels - so I'd like to essentially revert this patch.
>
> Out of curiosity, when did clang get support for this?
>
> Christian
>
> > Is this OK?
> >
> >
> > On Thu, Apr 24, 2014 at 8:23 PM David Blaikie <dblaikie@gmail.com>
> wrote:
> > >
> > > On Wed, Apr 23, 2014 at 3:03 PM, Doug Evans <dje@google.com> wrote:
> > > > David Blaikie writes:
> > > >  > Clang doesn't emit debug info for labels (Clang PR14500). XFAIL a
> > > >  > bunch of GDB tests that rely on debug info for labels.
> > > >  >
> > > >  > For some reason gdb.linespec/ls-expr.exp gathered all tests into a
> > > >  > dictionary and then ran them. This made it hard to XFAIL just the
> > > >  > right tests. I refactored this to execute the tests directly,
> removing
> > > >  > the dictionary so I could XFAIL the right tests. Is there a
> reason it
> > > >  > would've been written that way? Does my patch break it in some
> way?
> > > >  > commit c438cb16b63292e415330f289616c4e4ecece63c
> > > >  > Author: David Blaikie <dblaikie@gmail.com>
> > > >  > Date:   Sun Apr 13 11:42:02 2014 -0700
> > > >  >
> > > >  >     XFAIL under Clang tests using labels
> > > >  >
> > > >  >     gdb/testsuite/
> > > >  >      * gdb.base/label.exp: XFAIL label related tests under Clang.
> > > >  >      * gdb.cp/cplabel.exp: Ditto.
> > > >  >      * gdb.linespec/ls-errs.exp: Refactor tests to execute
> directly
> > > >  >      and XFAIL under Clang those using labels.
> > > >
> > > > LGTM
> > > >
> > > >  > diff --git gdb/testsuite/ChangeLog gdb/testsuite/ChangeLog
> > > >  > index 730c116..b04b940 100644
> > > >  > --- gdb/testsuite/ChangeLog
> > > >  > +++ gdb/testsuite/ChangeLog
> > > >  > @@ -1,3 +1,9 @@
> > > >  > +2014-04-12  David Blaikie  <dblaikie@gmail.com>
> > > >  > +
> > > >  > +        * gdb.base/label.exp: XFAIL label related tests under
> Clang.
> > > >  > +    * gdb.cp/cplabel.exp: Ditto.
> > > >  > +    * gdb.linespec/ls-errs.exp: Refactor tests to execute
> directly and XFAIL under Clang those using labels.
> > > >  > +
> > > >
> > > > Nit: space vs tabs.  Just use tabs.
> > > > Plus line is longer than 80 chars.
> > >
> > > Thanks for the catches - fixed those up and committed in
> > > c2e827ad5340fcf1735df6c77cb0311e56b985ef.
> > >
> > > Also refactored some of the xfails along the lines of what Pedro
> > > suggested in the one test case that had several similar failures
> > > (gdb.base/label.exp). If/when we fix this in Clang it might be worth
> > > refactoring into a common function (though I'm personally not very
> > > vested in keeping the test suite usable with anything other than ToT
> > > Clang - perhaps others are).
>


  reply	other threads:[~2019-09-06  4:17 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 11+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2014-04-13 23:26 David Blaikie
2014-04-23 22:03 ` Doug Evans
2014-04-25  3:23   ` David Blaikie
2019-09-05 22:12     ` David Blaikie
2019-09-06  2:48       ` Christian Biesinger via gdb-patches
2019-09-06  4:17         ` Eric Christopher [this message]
2019-09-06 17:26           ` Christian Biesinger via gdb-patches
2019-09-06 20:23             ` David Blaikie
2019-09-06 20:25               ` Christian Biesinger via gdb-patches
     [not found]       ` <CADPb22Svrkdy6eOmcY2CxYAHfmaz_vRPE8sLDrujJCjbXCFMNg@mail.gmail.com>
2019-09-06 21:19         ` David Blaikie
2014-04-24 10:42 ` Pedro Alves

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=CALehDX6gMO3FRETrqARXEQN1wqX6kVL7Ay3Nc8Anz1OfzfBYPA@mail.gmail.com \
    --to=echristo@gmail.com \
    --cc=cbiesinger@google.com \
    --cc=dblaikie@gmail.com \
    --cc=dje@google.com \
    --cc=gdb-patches@sourceware.org \
    --cc=palves@redhat.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox