Mirror of the gdb-patches mailing list
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: David Blaikie <dblaikie@gmail.com>
To: Doug Evans <dje@google.com>
Cc: Pedro Alves <palves@redhat.com>,
	gdb-patches <gdb-patches@sourceware.org>
Subject: Re: [patch] [gdb/testsuite] XFAIL under Clang tests using label debug info
Date: Fri, 06 Sep 2019 21:19:00 -0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <CAENS6EsJozyVqjAUdSF+N5uka-RmEc8F=RTQyZ2XsiAE8Wteew@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CADPb22Svrkdy6eOmcY2CxYAHfmaz_vRPE8sLDrujJCjbXCFMNg@mail.gmail.com>

Thanks!
Committed as 736b0f76188c7a4d497a5e2255b78af909393afe

On Thu, Sep 5, 2019 at 5:53 PM Doug Evans <dje@google.com> wrote:
>
> SGTM
>
> On Thu, Sep 5, 2019 at 3:12 PM David Blaikie <dblaikie@gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>> Clang now supports labels - so I'd like to essentially revert this patch.
>>
>> Is this OK?
>>
>>
>> On Thu, Apr 24, 2014 at 8:23 PM David Blaikie <dblaikie@gmail.com> wrote:
>> >
>> > On Wed, Apr 23, 2014 at 3:03 PM, Doug Evans <dje@google.com> wrote:
>> > > David Blaikie writes:
>> > >  > Clang doesn't emit debug info for labels (Clang PR14500). XFAIL a
>> > >  > bunch of GDB tests that rely on debug info for labels.
>> > >  >
>> > >  > For some reason gdb.linespec/ls-expr.exp gathered all tests into a
>> > >  > dictionary and then ran them. This made it hard to XFAIL just the
>> > >  > right tests. I refactored this to execute the tests directly, removing
>> > >  > the dictionary so I could XFAIL the right tests. Is there a reason it
>> > >  > would've been written that way? Does my patch break it in some way?
>> > >  > commit c438cb16b63292e415330f289616c4e4ecece63c
>> > >  > Author: David Blaikie <dblaikie@gmail.com>
>> > >  > Date:   Sun Apr 13 11:42:02 2014 -0700
>> > >  >
>> > >  >     XFAIL under Clang tests using labels
>> > >  >
>> > >  >     gdb/testsuite/
>> > >  >      * gdb.base/label.exp: XFAIL label related tests under Clang.
>> > >  >      * gdb.cp/cplabel.exp: Ditto.
>> > >  >      * gdb.linespec/ls-errs.exp: Refactor tests to execute directly
>> > >  >      and XFAIL under Clang those using labels.
>> > >
>> > > LGTM
>> > >
>> > >  > diff --git gdb/testsuite/ChangeLog gdb/testsuite/ChangeLog
>> > >  > index 730c116..b04b940 100644
>> > >  > --- gdb/testsuite/ChangeLog
>> > >  > +++ gdb/testsuite/ChangeLog
>> > >  > @@ -1,3 +1,9 @@
>> > >  > +2014-04-12  David Blaikie  <dblaikie@gmail.com>
>> > >  > +
>> > >  > +        * gdb.base/label.exp: XFAIL label related tests under Clang.
>> > >  > +    * gdb.cp/cplabel.exp: Ditto.
>> > >  > +    * gdb.linespec/ls-errs.exp: Refactor tests to execute directly and XFAIL under Clang those using labels.
>> > >  > +
>> > >
>> > > Nit: space vs tabs.  Just use tabs.
>> > > Plus line is longer than 80 chars.
>> >
>> > Thanks for the catches - fixed those up and committed in
>> > c2e827ad5340fcf1735df6c77cb0311e56b985ef.
>> >
>> > Also refactored some of the xfails along the lines of what Pedro
>> > suggested in the one test case that had several similar failures
>> > (gdb.base/label.exp). If/when we fix this in Clang it might be worth
>> > refactoring into a common function (though I'm personally not very
>> > vested in keeping the test suite usable with anything other than ToT
>> > Clang - perhaps others are).


  parent reply	other threads:[~2019-09-06 21:19 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 11+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2014-04-13 23:26 David Blaikie
2014-04-23 22:03 ` Doug Evans
2014-04-25  3:23   ` David Blaikie
2019-09-05 22:12     ` David Blaikie
2019-09-06  2:48       ` Christian Biesinger via gdb-patches
2019-09-06  4:17         ` Eric Christopher
2019-09-06 17:26           ` Christian Biesinger via gdb-patches
2019-09-06 20:23             ` David Blaikie
2019-09-06 20:25               ` Christian Biesinger via gdb-patches
     [not found]       ` <CADPb22Svrkdy6eOmcY2CxYAHfmaz_vRPE8sLDrujJCjbXCFMNg@mail.gmail.com>
2019-09-06 21:19         ` David Blaikie [this message]
2014-04-24 10:42 ` Pedro Alves

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to='CAENS6EsJozyVqjAUdSF+N5uka-RmEc8F=RTQyZ2XsiAE8Wteew@mail.gmail.com' \
    --to=dblaikie@gmail.com \
    --cc=dje@google.com \
    --cc=gdb-patches@sourceware.org \
    --cc=palves@redhat.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox