From: David Blaikie <dblaikie@gmail.com>
To: Doug Evans <dje@google.com>
Cc: Pedro Alves <palves@redhat.com>,
gdb-patches <gdb-patches@sourceware.org>
Subject: Re: [patch] [gdb/testsuite] XFAIL under Clang tests using label debug info
Date: Fri, 06 Sep 2019 21:19:00 -0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <CAENS6EsJozyVqjAUdSF+N5uka-RmEc8F=RTQyZ2XsiAE8Wteew@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CADPb22Svrkdy6eOmcY2CxYAHfmaz_vRPE8sLDrujJCjbXCFMNg@mail.gmail.com>
Thanks!
Committed as 736b0f76188c7a4d497a5e2255b78af909393afe
On Thu, Sep 5, 2019 at 5:53 PM Doug Evans <dje@google.com> wrote:
>
> SGTM
>
> On Thu, Sep 5, 2019 at 3:12 PM David Blaikie <dblaikie@gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>> Clang now supports labels - so I'd like to essentially revert this patch.
>>
>> Is this OK?
>>
>>
>> On Thu, Apr 24, 2014 at 8:23 PM David Blaikie <dblaikie@gmail.com> wrote:
>> >
>> > On Wed, Apr 23, 2014 at 3:03 PM, Doug Evans <dje@google.com> wrote:
>> > > David Blaikie writes:
>> > > > Clang doesn't emit debug info for labels (Clang PR14500). XFAIL a
>> > > > bunch of GDB tests that rely on debug info for labels.
>> > > >
>> > > > For some reason gdb.linespec/ls-expr.exp gathered all tests into a
>> > > > dictionary and then ran them. This made it hard to XFAIL just the
>> > > > right tests. I refactored this to execute the tests directly, removing
>> > > > the dictionary so I could XFAIL the right tests. Is there a reason it
>> > > > would've been written that way? Does my patch break it in some way?
>> > > > commit c438cb16b63292e415330f289616c4e4ecece63c
>> > > > Author: David Blaikie <dblaikie@gmail.com>
>> > > > Date: Sun Apr 13 11:42:02 2014 -0700
>> > > >
>> > > > XFAIL under Clang tests using labels
>> > > >
>> > > > gdb/testsuite/
>> > > > * gdb.base/label.exp: XFAIL label related tests under Clang.
>> > > > * gdb.cp/cplabel.exp: Ditto.
>> > > > * gdb.linespec/ls-errs.exp: Refactor tests to execute directly
>> > > > and XFAIL under Clang those using labels.
>> > >
>> > > LGTM
>> > >
>> > > > diff --git gdb/testsuite/ChangeLog gdb/testsuite/ChangeLog
>> > > > index 730c116..b04b940 100644
>> > > > --- gdb/testsuite/ChangeLog
>> > > > +++ gdb/testsuite/ChangeLog
>> > > > @@ -1,3 +1,9 @@
>> > > > +2014-04-12 David Blaikie <dblaikie@gmail.com>
>> > > > +
>> > > > + * gdb.base/label.exp: XFAIL label related tests under Clang.
>> > > > + * gdb.cp/cplabel.exp: Ditto.
>> > > > + * gdb.linespec/ls-errs.exp: Refactor tests to execute directly and XFAIL under Clang those using labels.
>> > > > +
>> > >
>> > > Nit: space vs tabs. Just use tabs.
>> > > Plus line is longer than 80 chars.
>> >
>> > Thanks for the catches - fixed those up and committed in
>> > c2e827ad5340fcf1735df6c77cb0311e56b985ef.
>> >
>> > Also refactored some of the xfails along the lines of what Pedro
>> > suggested in the one test case that had several similar failures
>> > (gdb.base/label.exp). If/when we fix this in Clang it might be worth
>> > refactoring into a common function (though I'm personally not very
>> > vested in keeping the test suite usable with anything other than ToT
>> > Clang - perhaps others are).
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2019-09-06 21:19 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 11+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2014-04-13 23:26 David Blaikie
2014-04-23 22:03 ` Doug Evans
2014-04-25 3:23 ` David Blaikie
2019-09-05 22:12 ` David Blaikie
2019-09-06 2:48 ` Christian Biesinger via gdb-patches
2019-09-06 4:17 ` Eric Christopher
2019-09-06 17:26 ` Christian Biesinger via gdb-patches
2019-09-06 20:23 ` David Blaikie
2019-09-06 20:25 ` Christian Biesinger via gdb-patches
[not found] ` <CADPb22Svrkdy6eOmcY2CxYAHfmaz_vRPE8sLDrujJCjbXCFMNg@mail.gmail.com>
2019-09-06 21:19 ` David Blaikie [this message]
2014-04-24 10:42 ` Pedro Alves
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to='CAENS6EsJozyVqjAUdSF+N5uka-RmEc8F=RTQyZ2XsiAE8Wteew@mail.gmail.com' \
--to=dblaikie@gmail.com \
--cc=dje@google.com \
--cc=gdb-patches@sourceware.org \
--cc=palves@redhat.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox