Re: [PATCH 1/1] Add debuginfod support to GDB

[Aaron Merey <amerey@redhat.com>]

On Thu, Jan 9, 2020 at 6:28 PM Christian Biesinger
<cbiesinger@google.com> wrote:
> On Thu, Jan 9, 2020 at 4:41 PM Aaron Merey <amerey@redhat.com> wrote:
> > The reason for the top-level AC_DEBUGINFOD is to prevent the top-level
> > configure check from succeeding in cases where --with-debuginfod is
> > given but the debuginfod library or header cannot be found.
>
> Why is debuginfo special in that way? There are a lot of other
> libraries in the same situation.

It was recommended to me on binutils@ that the top-level configure check
should fail if --with-debuginfod is given but not installed.

https://sourceware.org/ml/binutils/2019-11/msg00371.html

Despite that I can remove the top-level AC_DEBUGINFOD to match the
behavior of other configure options.

> Now that GDB is C++, I'd move the declarations to where the variables
> are used, e.g.:
>   debuginfod_client *client = debuginfod_begin ();
>
> +      if (client != NULL)
>
> nullptr
>
> +++ b/gdb/elfread.c
>
> same here

Ok.

> Don't you also need to update gdb/README (the `configure' options
> section) and doc/gdb.texinfo (@node Configure Options)?

gdb.texinfo was updated in this patch but not README, will fix that.

Aaron