Mirror of the gdb-patches mailing list
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Doug Evans <dje@google.com>
To: Gary Benson <gbenson@redhat.com>
Cc: gdb-patches <gdb-patches@sourceware.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/3] Remove spurious exceptions.h inclusions
Date: Wed, 08 Oct 2014 17:03:00 -0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <CADPb22RcwUGPEwGGc7hG=4R0KvRV9axKDbQ6Nu1PHys5Nk=t8A@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1409586154-16196-2-git-send-email-gbenson@redhat.com>

On Mon, Sep 1, 2014 at 11:42 AM, Gary Benson <gbenson@redhat.com> wrote:
> defs.h includes utils.h, and utils.h includes exceptions.h.  All GDB
> .c files include defs.h as their first line, so no file other than
> utils.h needs to include exceptions.h.  This commit removes all such
> inclusions.
>
> Doug, I Cc'd you on this one as you asked me to avoid giant mechanical
> ChangeLog entries but I couldn't figure out how I'd rewrite this one.

For reference sake,
I said that for two reasons:
1) to save you some typing
2) to keep the S/N ratio of the ChangeLog file from dropping, and in
this case from dropping significantly.  Yikes!

> gdb/ChangeLog:
>
>         * ada-lang.c: Do not include exceptions.h.
>         * ada-valprint.c: Likewise.
>         * amd64-tdep.c: Likewise.
> [...]

I realize one of the guidelines for changelogs is to document every
file that's changed, but if we can agree that "All callers updated."
can apply to all callers in all files, then I don't see why we
couldn't be ok with something like the following for this case:

        * All .c files: Do not include exceptions.h.

Yeah, it's not pedantically correct, not all .c files were touched.
But I can live with that given the alternative.


  parent reply	other threads:[~2014-10-08 17:03 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 17+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2014-09-01 15:42 [PATCH 0/3] Rationalize cleanups/exceptions includes Gary Benson
2014-09-01 15:42 ` [PATCH 2/3] Include cleanups.h in common-defs.h Gary Benson
2014-10-07 18:05   ` Pedro Alves
2014-09-01 15:42 ` [PATCH 1/3] Remove spurious exceptions.h inclusions Gary Benson
2014-10-07 18:04   ` Pedro Alves
2014-10-08 17:03   ` Doug Evans [this message]
2014-10-08 17:12     ` Doug Evans
2014-10-08 17:21       ` Pedro Alves
2014-10-08 17:24       ` Doug Evans
2014-10-09  9:43         ` Gary Benson
2014-10-09 11:43           ` Pedro Alves
2014-10-09  9:45     ` Gary Benson
2014-10-09 14:47       ` Doug Evans
2014-09-01 15:42 ` [PATCH 3/3] Include common-exceptions.h in common-defs.h Gary Benson
2014-10-07 18:05   ` Pedro Alves
2014-10-07  8:58 ` [PING PATCH 0/3] Rationalize cleanups/exceptions includes Gary Benson
2014-10-08  8:47 ` [PATCH " Gary Benson

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to='CADPb22RcwUGPEwGGc7hG=4R0KvRV9axKDbQ6Nu1PHys5Nk=t8A@mail.gmail.com' \
    --to=dje@google.com \
    --cc=gbenson@redhat.com \
    --cc=gdb-patches@sourceware.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox