* [PATCH] Fix Value.format_string docu for static members argument [not found] <20201124184938.47048-1-ssbssa.ref@yahoo.de> @ 2020-11-24 18:49 ` Hannes Domani via Gdb-patches 2020-11-24 19:10 ` Eli Zaretskii via Gdb-patches 0 siblings, 1 reply; 6+ messages in thread From: Hannes Domani via Gdb-patches @ 2020-11-24 18:49 UTC (permalink / raw) To: gdb-patches The argument is called static_members, not static_fields. gdb/doc/ChangeLog: 2020-11-24 Hannes Domani <ssbssa@yahoo.de> * python.texi: Fix docu for static members argument. --- gdb/doc/python.texi | 2 +- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/gdb/doc/python.texi b/gdb/doc/python.texi index 8e6d88f3fc..60ae20f2c1 100644 --- a/gdb/doc/python.texi +++ b/gdb/doc/python.texi @@ -926,7 +926,7 @@ identify the @emph{actual} (derived) type of the object rather than the the @emph{declared} type should be used. (See @code{set print object} in @ref{Print Settings}). -@item static_fields +@item static_members @code{True} if static members should be included in the string representation of a C@t{++} object, @code{False} if they shouldn't (see @code{set print static-members} in @ref{Print Settings}). -- 2.29.2 ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH] Fix Value.format_string docu for static members argument 2020-11-24 18:49 ` [PATCH] Fix Value.format_string docu for static members argument Hannes Domani via Gdb-patches @ 2020-11-24 19:10 ` Eli Zaretskii via Gdb-patches 2020-11-24 19:13 ` Simon Marchi 0 siblings, 1 reply; 6+ messages in thread From: Eli Zaretskii via Gdb-patches @ 2020-11-24 19:10 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Hannes Domani; +Cc: gdb-patches > Date: Tue, 24 Nov 2020 19:49:38 +0100 > From: Hannes Domani via Gdb-patches <gdb-patches@sourceware.org> > > The argument is called static_members, not static_fields. > > gdb/doc/ChangeLog: > > 2020-11-24 Hannes Domani <ssbssa@yahoo.de> > > * python.texi: Fix docu for static members argument. OK, thanks. ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH] Fix Value.format_string docu for static members argument 2020-11-24 19:10 ` Eli Zaretskii via Gdb-patches @ 2020-11-24 19:13 ` Simon Marchi 2020-11-24 19:15 ` Hannes Domani via Gdb-patches 0 siblings, 1 reply; 6+ messages in thread From: Simon Marchi @ 2020-11-24 19:13 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Eli Zaretskii, Hannes Domani; +Cc: gdb-patches On 2020-11-24 2:10 p.m., Eli Zaretskii via Gdb-patches wrote: >> Date: Tue, 24 Nov 2020 19:49:38 +0100 >> From: Hannes Domani via Gdb-patches <gdb-patches@sourceware.org> >> >> The argument is called static_members, not static_fields. >> >> gdb/doc/ChangeLog: >> >> 2020-11-24 Hannes Domani <ssbssa@yahoo.de> >> >> * python.texi: Fix docu for static members argument. > > OK, thanks. > It wouldn't hurt to push this patch to the GDB 10 branch, I think. Simon ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH] Fix Value.format_string docu for static members argument 2020-11-24 19:13 ` Simon Marchi @ 2020-11-24 19:15 ` Hannes Domani via Gdb-patches 2020-11-24 19:18 ` Simon Marchi 0 siblings, 1 reply; 6+ messages in thread From: Hannes Domani via Gdb-patches @ 2020-11-24 19:15 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Eli Zaretskii, Simon Marchi; +Cc: gdb-patches Am Dienstag, 24. November 2020, 20:13:25 MEZ hat Simon Marchi <simark@simark.ca> Folgendes geschrieben: > On 2020-11-24 2:10 p.m., Eli Zaretskii via Gdb-patches wrote: > > >> Date: Tue, 24 Nov 2020 19:49:38 +0100 > >> From: Hannes Domani via Gdb-patches <gdb-patches@sourceware.org> > >> > >> The argument is called static_members, not static_fields. > >> > >> gdb/doc/ChangeLog: > >> > >> 2020-11-24 Hannes Domani <ssbssa@yahoo.de> > >> > >> * python.texi: Fix docu for static members argument. > > > > OK, thanks. > > > > > It wouldn't hurt to push this patch to the GDB 10 branch, I think. So would this need a PR then? Hannes ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH] Fix Value.format_string docu for static members argument 2020-11-24 19:15 ` Hannes Domani via Gdb-patches @ 2020-11-24 19:18 ` Simon Marchi 2020-11-29 18:16 ` Hannes Domani via Gdb-patches 0 siblings, 1 reply; 6+ messages in thread From: Simon Marchi @ 2020-11-24 19:18 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Hannes Domani, Eli Zaretskii; +Cc: gdb-patches On 2020-11-24 2:15 p.m., Hannes Domani via Gdb-patches wrote: > Am Dienstag, 24. November 2020, 20:13:25 MEZ hat Simon Marchi <simark@simark.ca> Folgendes geschrieben: > >> On 2020-11-24 2:10 p.m., Eli Zaretskii via Gdb-patches wrote: >> >>>> Date: Tue, 24 Nov 2020 19:49:38 +0100 >>>> From: Hannes Domani via Gdb-patches <gdb-patches@sourceware.org> >>>> >>>> The argument is called static_members, not static_fields. >>>> >>>> gdb/doc/ChangeLog: >>>> >>>> 2020-11-24 Hannes Domani <ssbssa@yahoo.de> >>>> >>>> * python.texi: Fix docu for static members argument. >>> >>> OK, thanks. >> >>> >> >> It wouldn't hurt to push this patch to the GDB 10 branch, I think. > > So would this need a PR then? Hmm, right. Well, if you don't mind creating one it would be nice, but otherwise it's not the end of the world. Simon ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH] Fix Value.format_string docu for static members argument 2020-11-24 19:18 ` Simon Marchi @ 2020-11-29 18:16 ` Hannes Domani via Gdb-patches 0 siblings, 0 replies; 6+ messages in thread From: Hannes Domani via Gdb-patches @ 2020-11-29 18:16 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Eli Zaretskii, Simon Marchi; +Cc: gdb-patches Am Dienstag, 24. November 2020, 20:18:14 MEZ hat Simon Marchi <simark@simark.ca> Folgendes geschrieben: > On 2020-11-24 2:15 p.m., Hannes Domani via Gdb-patches wrote: > > Am Dienstag, 24. November 2020, 20:13:25 MEZ hat Simon Marchi <simark@simark.ca> Folgendes geschrieben: > > > >> On 2020-11-24 2:10 p.m., Eli Zaretskii via Gdb-patches wrote: > >> > >>>> Date: Tue, 24 Nov 2020 19:49:38 +0100 > >>>> From: Hannes Domani via Gdb-patches <gdb-patches@sourceware.org> > >>>> > >>>> The argument is called static_members, not static_fields. > >>>> > >>>> gdb/doc/ChangeLog: > >>>> > >>>> 2020-11-24 Hannes Domani <ssbssa@yahoo.de> > >>>> > >>>> * python.texi: Fix docu for static members argument. > >>> > >>> OK, thanks. > >> > >>> > >> > >> It wouldn't hurt to push this patch to the GDB 10 branch, I think. > > > > So would this need a PR then? > > Hmm, right. Well, if you don't mind creating one it would be nice, but > otherwise it's not the end of the world. I've create PR python/26974, and pushed this to master and gdb 10, thanks. Hannes ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2020-11-29 18:16 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 6+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
[not found] <20201124184938.47048-1-ssbssa.ref@yahoo.de>
2020-11-24 18:49 ` [PATCH] Fix Value.format_string docu for static members argument Hannes Domani via Gdb-patches
2020-11-24 19:10 ` Eli Zaretskii via Gdb-patches
2020-11-24 19:13 ` Simon Marchi
2020-11-24 19:15 ` Hannes Domani via Gdb-patches
2020-11-24 19:18 ` Simon Marchi
2020-11-29 18:16 ` Hannes Domani via Gdb-patches
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox