From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from simark.ca by simark.ca with LMTP id k620FXhcvV/+cAAAWB0awg (envelope-from ) for ; Tue, 24 Nov 2020 14:18:16 -0500 Received: by simark.ca (Postfix, from userid 112) id 4BE531F0AB; Tue, 24 Nov 2020 14:18:16 -0500 (EST) X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.2 (2018-09-13) on simark.ca X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.0 required=5.0 tests=MAILING_LIST_MULTI, URIBL_BLOCKED autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.2 Received: from sourceware.org (server2.sourceware.org [8.43.85.97]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by simark.ca (Postfix) with ESMTPS id A30E81E776 for ; Tue, 24 Nov 2020 14:18:15 -0500 (EST) Received: from server2.sourceware.org (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by sourceware.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4CC6A3857015; Tue, 24 Nov 2020 19:18:15 +0000 (GMT) Received: from simark.ca (simark.ca [158.69.221.121]) by sourceware.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 64E003857015 for ; Tue, 24 Nov 2020 19:18:12 +0000 (GMT) DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.3.2 sourceware.org 64E003857015 Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; dmarc=none (p=none dis=none) header.from=simark.ca Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=simark@simark.ca Received: from [10.0.0.11] (173-246-6-90.qc.cable.ebox.net [173.246.6.90]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 (128/128 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by simark.ca (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id F09FE1E776; Tue, 24 Nov 2020 14:18:11 -0500 (EST) Subject: Re: [PATCH] Fix Value.format_string docu for static members argument To: Hannes Domani , Eli Zaretskii References: <20201124184938.47048-1-ssbssa.ref@yahoo.de> <20201124184938.47048-1-ssbssa@yahoo.de> <83eekitvtd.fsf@gnu.org> <2112144375.2173658.1606245313517@mail.yahoo.com> From: Simon Marchi Message-ID: <9f571454-1cdf-1af5-edb0-2f7732a88942@simark.ca> Date: Tue, 24 Nov 2020 14:18:11 -0500 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:68.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/68.12.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <2112144375.2173658.1606245313517@mail.yahoo.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Language: fr Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-BeenThere: gdb-patches@sourceware.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Gdb-patches mailing list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Cc: "gdb-patches@sourceware.org" Errors-To: gdb-patches-bounces@sourceware.org Sender: "Gdb-patches" On 2020-11-24 2:15 p.m., Hannes Domani via Gdb-patches wrote: > Am Dienstag, 24. November 2020, 20:13:25 MEZ hat Simon Marchi Folgendes geschrieben: > >> On 2020-11-24 2:10 p.m., Eli Zaretskii via Gdb-patches wrote: >> >>>> Date: Tue, 24 Nov 2020 19:49:38 +0100 >>>> From: Hannes Domani via Gdb-patches >>>> >>>> The argument is called static_members, not static_fields. >>>> >>>> gdb/doc/ChangeLog: >>>> >>>> 2020-11-24 Hannes Domani >>>> >>>> * python.texi: Fix docu for static members argument. >>> >>> OK, thanks. >> >>> >> >> It wouldn't hurt to push this patch to the GDB 10 branch, I think. > > So would this need a PR then? Hmm, right. Well, if you don't mind creating one it would be nice, but otherwise it's not the end of the world. Simon