From: Jim Blandy <jimb@red-bean.com>
To: gdb-patches@sourceware.org
Subject: Re: [RFC] Alternate approach to keeping convenience variables
Date: Wed, 25 Jan 2006 00:13:00 -0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <8f2776cb0601241612u522668aaw37796b2562a658ad@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20060124192438.GA24103@nevyn.them.org>
My point was simply that life is easier when you have invariants that
hold over wider regions. I see that someone who has the whole picture
in mind can get the effect they want, but it's simpler to have only
one case to handle in the first place (is $trace_frame -1?) than two
(is $trace_frame even set? what is it set to?).
But I think you all understand what I've been trying to say. All the
persuading that's going to happen has already happened. :)
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2006-01-25 0:13 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 32+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2005-11-21 22:05 [PATCH] keeping convenience variables (take 2) Andrew STUBBS
2005-11-22 4:58 ` Eli Zaretskii
2005-11-22 8:43 ` Jim Blandy
2005-11-22 19:27 ` Andrew STUBBS
2005-12-10 4:46 ` [RFC] Alternate approach to keeping convenience variables Daniel Jacobowitz
2005-12-10 5:07 ` Jim Blandy
2005-12-10 8:24 ` Daniel Jacobowitz
2005-12-10 22:20 ` Jim Blandy
2005-12-11 18:12 ` Eli Zaretskii
2005-12-11 19:17 ` Eli Zaretskii
2006-01-23 22:29 ` Jim Blandy
2006-01-24 11:44 ` Andrew STUBBS
2006-01-24 18:41 ` Jim Blandy
2006-01-24 18:43 ` Daniel Jacobowitz
2006-01-24 19:16 ` Jim Blandy
2006-01-24 19:24 ` Daniel Jacobowitz
2006-01-25 0:13 ` Jim Blandy [this message]
2006-01-24 19:45 ` Andrew STUBBS
2006-01-04 12:17 ` Andrew STUBBS
2006-01-04 17:00 ` Jim Blandy
2006-01-04 17:48 ` Andrew STUBBS
2006-01-04 18:37 ` Jim Blandy
2006-01-22 21:04 ` Daniel Jacobowitz
2006-01-22 21:31 ` Daniel Jacobowitz
2006-01-23 22:46 ` Jim Blandy
2006-01-27 17:53 ` Eli Zaretskii
2006-01-27 18:12 ` Jim Blandy
2006-01-27 18:29 ` Eli Zaretskii
2006-01-27 18:41 ` Joel Brobecker
2006-02-01 23:14 ` Daniel Jacobowitz
2006-02-02 4:18 ` Eli Zaretskii
2006-02-06 22:14 ` Daniel Jacobowitz
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=8f2776cb0601241612u522668aaw37796b2562a658ad@mail.gmail.com \
--to=jimb@red-bean.com \
--cc=gdb-patches@sourceware.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox