From: Daniel Jacobowitz <drow@false.org>
To: Jim Blandy <jimb@red-bean.com>
Cc: Andrew STUBBS <andrew.stubbs@st.com>,
Eli Zaretskii <eliz@gnu.org>,
gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com
Subject: Re: [RFC] Alternate approach to keeping convenience variables
Date: Tue, 24 Jan 2006 18:43:00 -0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20060124184348.GA22916@nevyn.them.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <8f2776cb0601241040u3f542b15s2efae535170a6492@mail.gmail.com>
On Tue, Jan 24, 2006 at 10:40:58AM -0800, Jim Blandy wrote:
> On 1/24/06, Andrew STUBBS <andrew.stubbs@st.com> wrote:
> > Jim Blandy wrote:
> > > The $trace_frame variable is set to -1 when GDB starts, which
> > > indicates that there's no trace frame selected. I think it would be a
> > > little more helpful for the variables to always exist: you can write
> > > user-defined commands that give a reasonable error message, for
> > > example. GDB doesn't have any way (?) to check whether a convenience
> > > variable has been initialized yet.
> >
> > A newly created convenience variable has the value 'void'. (A variable
> > is created the first time it is referenced, even as an rvalue.)
> > Therefore, if it is 'void' it can be considered uninitialised.
>
> Right, but there's no way to test for that in the scripting language.
> Your 'init-if-undefined' command has to be a primitive, implemented in
> C. My argument was that having the variables always be present is
> more convenient for user-defined commands.
Andrew's point is that such a primitive was recently committed :-)
--
Daniel Jacobowitz
CodeSourcery
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2006-01-24 18:43 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 32+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2005-11-21 22:05 [PATCH] keeping convenience variables (take 2) Andrew STUBBS
2005-11-22 4:58 ` Eli Zaretskii
2005-11-22 8:43 ` Jim Blandy
2005-11-22 19:27 ` Andrew STUBBS
2005-12-10 4:46 ` [RFC] Alternate approach to keeping convenience variables Daniel Jacobowitz
2005-12-10 5:07 ` Jim Blandy
2005-12-10 8:24 ` Daniel Jacobowitz
2005-12-10 22:20 ` Jim Blandy
2005-12-11 18:12 ` Eli Zaretskii
2005-12-11 19:17 ` Eli Zaretskii
2006-01-23 22:29 ` Jim Blandy
2006-01-24 11:44 ` Andrew STUBBS
2006-01-24 18:41 ` Jim Blandy
2006-01-24 18:43 ` Daniel Jacobowitz [this message]
2006-01-24 19:16 ` Jim Blandy
2006-01-24 19:24 ` Daniel Jacobowitz
2006-01-25 0:13 ` Jim Blandy
2006-01-24 19:45 ` Andrew STUBBS
2006-01-04 12:17 ` Andrew STUBBS
2006-01-04 17:00 ` Jim Blandy
2006-01-04 17:48 ` Andrew STUBBS
2006-01-04 18:37 ` Jim Blandy
2006-01-22 21:04 ` Daniel Jacobowitz
2006-01-22 21:31 ` Daniel Jacobowitz
2006-01-23 22:46 ` Jim Blandy
2006-01-27 17:53 ` Eli Zaretskii
2006-01-27 18:12 ` Jim Blandy
2006-01-27 18:29 ` Eli Zaretskii
2006-01-27 18:41 ` Joel Brobecker
2006-02-01 23:14 ` Daniel Jacobowitz
2006-02-02 4:18 ` Eli Zaretskii
2006-02-06 22:14 ` Daniel Jacobowitz
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20060124184348.GA22916@nevyn.them.org \
--to=drow@false.org \
--cc=andrew.stubbs@st.com \
--cc=eliz@gnu.org \
--cc=gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com \
--cc=jimb@red-bean.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox