Mirror of the gdb-patches mailing list
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Paul Pluzhnikov <ppluzhnikov@google.com>
To: Ulrich Weigand <uweigand@de.ibm.com>
Cc: Joel Brobecker <brobecker@adacore.com>,
	tromey@redhat.com,         gdb-patches@sourceware.org
Subject: Re: [rfc][patch] Eliminate quadratic slow-down on number of solibs.
Date: Mon, 22 Jun 2009 22:04:00 -0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <8ac60eac0906221504l17329986yb36a5a1cae2412b@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <200906222006.n5MK6MAP015693@d12av02.megacenter.de.ibm.com>

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 845 bytes --]

On Mon, Jun 22, 2009 at 1:06 PM, Ulrich Weigand<uweigand@de.ibm.com> wrote:

>> Perhaps a better alternative is to restore the overlay-bp-reset behavior to
>> "before 2009-05-12" commit: now that this change is in:

Here is the patch to do that.

Tested on Linux/x86_64.

I also verified that create_overlay_event_breakpoint is not called for
each solib (though it is called 7 times, which seems like 6 too many).

Thanks,
-- 
Paul Pluzhnikov

2009-06-22  Paul Pluzhnikov  <ppluzhnikov@google.com>

	Revert 2009-05-14 breakpoint commit (no longer needed).
	* breakpoint.h (breakpoint_re_set_objfile): Remove
	* breakpoint.c (breakpoint_re_set_objfile): Likewise
	(create_overlay_event_breakpoint_1): Resurrect.
	(create_overlay_event_breakpoint): Likewise.
	* objfiles.c (objfile_relocate): Update.
	* symfile.c (new_symfile_objfile): Likewise.

[-- Attachment #2: gdb-overlay-bp-20090622-2.txt --]
[-- Type: text/plain, Size: 4282 bytes --]

Index: breakpoint.c
===================================================================
RCS file: /cvs/src/src/gdb/breakpoint.c,v
retrieving revision 1.407
diff -u -p -u -r1.407 breakpoint.c
--- breakpoint.c	19 Jun 2009 15:14:11 -0000	1.407
+++ breakpoint.c	22 Jun 2009 21:38:14 -0000
@@ -1476,7 +1476,7 @@ create_internal_breakpoint (CORE_ADDR ad
 }
 
 static void
-create_overlay_event_breakpoint (char *func_name, struct objfile *objfile)
+create_overlay_event_breakpoint_1 (char *func_name, struct objfile *objfile)
 {
   struct breakpoint *b;
   struct minimal_symbol *m;
@@ -1502,13 +1502,20 @@ create_overlay_event_breakpoint (char *f
   update_global_location_list (1);
 }
 
+static void
+create_overlay_event_breakpoint (char *func_name)
+{
+  struct objfile *objfile;
+  ALL_OBJFILES (objfile)
+    create_overlay_event_breakpoint_1 (func_name, objfile);
+}
+
 void
 update_breakpoints_after_exec (void)
 {
   struct breakpoint *b;
   struct breakpoint *temp;
   struct bp_location *bploc;
-  struct objfile *objfile;
 
   /* We're about to delete breakpoints from GDB's lists.  If the
      INSERTED flag is true, GDB will try to lift the breakpoints by
@@ -1603,8 +1610,7 @@ update_breakpoints_after_exec (void)
       }
   }
   /* FIXME what about longjmp breakpoints?  Re-create them here?  */
-  ALL_OBJFILES (objfile)
-    create_overlay_event_breakpoint ("_ovly_debug_event", objfile);
+  create_overlay_event_breakpoint ("_ovly_debug_event");
 }
 
 int
@@ -7771,13 +7777,9 @@ breakpoint_re_set_one (void *bint)
   return 0;
 }
 
-/* Re-set all breakpoints after symbols have been re-loaded.
-
-   If OBJFILE is non-null, create overlay break point only in OBJFILE
-   (speed optimization).  Otherwise rescan all loaded objfiles.  */
-
+/* Re-set all breakpoints after symbols have been re-loaded.  */
 void
-breakpoint_re_set_objfile (struct objfile *objfile)
+breakpoint_re_set (void)
 {
   struct breakpoint *b, *temp;
   enum language save_language;
@@ -7797,19 +7799,7 @@ breakpoint_re_set_objfile (struct objfil
   set_language (save_language);
   input_radix = save_input_radix;
 
-  if (objfile == NULL)
-    ALL_OBJFILES (objfile)
-      create_overlay_event_breakpoint ("_ovly_debug_event", objfile);
-  else
-    create_overlay_event_breakpoint ("_ovly_debug_event", objfile);
-}
-
-/* Re-set all breakpoints after symbols have been re-loaded.  */
-
-void
-breakpoint_re_set (void)
-{
-  breakpoint_re_set_objfile (NULL);
+  create_overlay_event_breakpoint ("_ovly_debug_event");
 }
 \f
 /* Reset the thread number of this breakpoint:
Index: breakpoint.h
===================================================================
RCS file: /cvs/src/src/gdb/breakpoint.h,v
retrieving revision 1.92
diff -u -p -u -r1.92 breakpoint.h
--- breakpoint.h	24 May 2009 18:00:08 -0000	1.92
+++ breakpoint.h	22 Jun 2009 21:38:14 -0000
@@ -687,7 +687,7 @@ extern int breakpoint_thread_match (CORE
 extern void until_break_command (char *, int, int);
 
 extern void breakpoint_re_set (void);
-extern void breakpoint_re_set_objfile (struct objfile *);
+
 extern void breakpoint_re_set_thread (struct breakpoint *);
 
 extern struct breakpoint *set_momentary_breakpoint
Index: objfiles.c
===================================================================
RCS file: /cvs/src/src/gdb/objfiles.c,v
retrieving revision 1.83
diff -u -p -u -r1.83 objfiles.c
--- objfiles.c	14 May 2009 23:33:08 -0000	1.83
+++ objfiles.c	22 Jun 2009 21:38:14 -0000
@@ -674,7 +674,7 @@ objfile_relocate (struct objfile *objfil
     }
 
   /* Relocate breakpoints as necessary, after things are relocated. */
-  breakpoint_re_set_objfile (objfile);
+  breakpoint_re_set ();
 }
 \f
 /* Many places in gdb want to test just to see if we have any partial
Index: symfile.c
===================================================================
RCS file: /cvs/src/src/gdb/symfile.c,v
retrieving revision 1.232
diff -u -p -u -r1.232 symfile.c
--- symfile.c	17 Jun 2009 18:34:34 -0000	1.232
+++ symfile.c	22 Jun 2009 21:38:15 -0000
@@ -919,7 +919,7 @@ new_symfile_objfile (struct objfile *obj
     }
   else if ((add_flags & SYMFILE_DEFER_BP_RESET) == 0)
     {
-      breakpoint_re_set_objfile (objfile);
+      breakpoint_re_set ();
     }
 
   /* We're done reading the symbol file; finish off complaints.  */

  reply	other threads:[~2009-06-22 22:04 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 17+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2009-04-20 23:29 Paul Pluzhnikov
2009-04-21  1:06 ` Tom Tromey
2009-04-29 21:12   ` Paul Pluzhnikov
2009-05-12  8:48     ` Joel Brobecker
2009-05-12 21:21       ` Paul Pluzhnikov
2009-05-13  9:39         ` Joel Brobecker
2009-06-22 17:10         ` Ulrich Weigand
2009-06-22 18:56           ` Paul Pluzhnikov
2009-06-22 19:30             ` Ulrich Weigand
2009-06-22 19:42               ` Paul Pluzhnikov
2009-06-22 20:06                 ` Ulrich Weigand
2009-06-22 22:04                   ` Paul Pluzhnikov [this message]
2009-06-23  0:43                     ` Ulrich Weigand
2009-06-23  1:33                       ` Paul Pluzhnikov
2009-06-23 13:32                         ` Ulrich Weigand
2009-06-22 20:41             ` Doug Evans
2009-06-22 20:48               ` Michael Snyder

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=8ac60eac0906221504l17329986yb36a5a1cae2412b@mail.gmail.com \
    --to=ppluzhnikov@google.com \
    --cc=brobecker@adacore.com \
    --cc=gdb-patches@sourceware.org \
    --cc=tromey@redhat.com \
    --cc=uweigand@de.ibm.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox