From: Paul Pluzhnikov <ppluzhnikov@google.com>
To: Joel Brobecker <brobecker@adacore.com>
Cc: gdb-patches@sourceware.org, Tom Tromey <tromey@redhat.com>
Subject: Re: [patch] Eliminate quadratic slow-down on number of solibs (part 2).
Date: Thu, 14 May 2009 17:45:00 -0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <8ac60eac0905141045q93bfc3fo2b22981f3b1d4db1@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20090514081402.GF7292@adacore.com>
On Thu, May 14, 2009 at 1:14 AM, Joel Brobecker <brobecker@adacore.com> wrote:
>> 3. The "don't reset all breakpoints over and over when adding
>> multiple solibs" patch here:
> I completely misunderstood this change you proposed! I see now what
> you are doing. This wouldn't help on systems such as Windows where
> DLLs are "discovered" through special events while waiting for inferior
> events. So shared libraries are never loaded at once, neither during
> startup or attaching.
Right. So Windows behaves as a program that dlopen()s all of
its DLLs in sequence.
> But on GNU/Linux, however, you're right, there
> is something to do in that case.
>
> I'd like to think about it, for a while... I wonder if we could use
> an observer to notify clients that symbols have been loaded, rather
> than calling breakpoint_re_set directly.
This (I think) would effectively achieve the same result as patch#2,
calling breakpoint_re_set only for individual solib.
[BTW, is it ok to commit patch#2 ?]
The problem is that breakpoint_re_set does a bunch of unnecessary
work, even when it knows which solib it should be dealing with.
In particular, for each breakpoint, it re-parses its addr_string,
selects correct address (possibly skipping function prolog, etc.).
When 'break main' is in effect, this one breakpoint's addr_string
is parsed N times, main is looked up N times, main's prolog is
skipped N times, etc. etc. This isn't quadratic, but accounts for
~15% of startup time, and adds up to minutes or large N.
I see that my comment about patch#3 transforming O(N*N) into O(N)
is correct only if patches #1 and #2 aren't applied. If they are
applied, then (I believe) patch#3 transforms O(N*M) into O(M), where
N is the number of solibs added "at once" and M is the number of
current breakpoints.
Thanks,
--
Paul Pluzhnikov
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2009-05-14 17:45 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 17+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2009-05-06 0:50 Paul Pluzhnikov
2009-05-12 8:25 ` Joel Brobecker
2009-05-12 20:53 ` Paul Pluzhnikov
2009-05-13 9:27 ` Joel Brobecker
2009-05-13 18:11 ` Paul Pluzhnikov
2009-05-14 8:14 ` Joel Brobecker
2009-05-14 17:45 ` Paul Pluzhnikov [this message]
2009-05-14 19:23 ` Joel Brobecker
2009-05-14 23:35 ` Paul Pluzhnikov
[not found] ` <20090521151540.GH16152@adacore.com>
2009-05-21 16:17 ` Paul Pluzhnikov
2009-05-21 16:40 ` Joel Brobecker
2009-05-30 2:08 ` Tom Tromey
2009-05-30 1:59 ` Tom Tromey
2009-06-03 19:46 ` Paul Pluzhnikov
2009-06-03 21:36 ` Tom Tromey
2009-05-12 19:43 Paul Pluzhnikov
2009-05-13 9:25 ` Joel Brobecker
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=8ac60eac0905141045q93bfc3fo2b22981f3b1d4db1@mail.gmail.com \
--to=ppluzhnikov@google.com \
--cc=brobecker@adacore.com \
--cc=gdb-patches@sourceware.org \
--cc=tromey@redhat.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox