From: Paul Pluzhnikov <ppluzhnikov@google.com>
To: Joel Brobecker <brobecker@adacore.com>
Cc: gdb-patches@sourceware.org, Tom Tromey <tromey@redhat.com>
Subject: Re: [patch] Eliminate quadratic slow-down on number of solibs (part 2).
Date: Tue, 12 May 2009 20:53:00 -0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <8ac60eac0905121353i4aae7110sebb34bec1de0d6d8@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20090512082530.GD7584@adacore.com>
On Tue, May 12, 2009 at 1:25 AM, Joel Brobecker <brobecker@adacore.com> wrote:
>> It feels like a hack, but I don't see how to achieve the same
>> result in a cleaner way :-(
>
> But I'm sympathetic to the issue - it's tough to have to wait
> an extra 20secs
Or extra 2 minutes in my case :-(
> when you know that you don't have any breakpoint
> refering to any SO... My thoughts on this: Perhaps a setting
> in the "maintenance set/show" that the user could change to deactivate
> breakpoint reset.
Note that the gdb-breakpoint-20090505.txt patch did not deactivate
breakpoint reset. It merely turned an O(N*N) operation into O(N)
operation, by resetting breakpoints once, after all solib symbols
have been loaded.
Because of that, your "maintenance set ..." suggestion doesn't
make sense to me: why would you ever want O(N*N) algorithm when an
O(N) one is available?
Thanks,
--
Paul Pluzhnikov
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2009-05-12 20:53 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 17+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2009-05-06 0:50 Paul Pluzhnikov
2009-05-12 8:25 ` Joel Brobecker
2009-05-12 20:53 ` Paul Pluzhnikov [this message]
2009-05-13 9:27 ` Joel Brobecker
2009-05-13 18:11 ` Paul Pluzhnikov
2009-05-14 8:14 ` Joel Brobecker
2009-05-14 17:45 ` Paul Pluzhnikov
2009-05-14 19:23 ` Joel Brobecker
2009-05-14 23:35 ` Paul Pluzhnikov
[not found] ` <20090521151540.GH16152@adacore.com>
2009-05-21 16:17 ` Paul Pluzhnikov
2009-05-21 16:40 ` Joel Brobecker
2009-05-30 2:08 ` Tom Tromey
2009-05-30 1:59 ` Tom Tromey
2009-06-03 19:46 ` Paul Pluzhnikov
2009-06-03 21:36 ` Tom Tromey
2009-05-12 19:43 Paul Pluzhnikov
2009-05-13 9:25 ` Joel Brobecker
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=8ac60eac0905121353i4aae7110sebb34bec1de0d6d8@mail.gmail.com \
--to=ppluzhnikov@google.com \
--cc=brobecker@adacore.com \
--cc=gdb-patches@sourceware.org \
--cc=tromey@redhat.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox