Mirror of the gdb-patches mailing list
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Paul Pluzhnikov <ppluzhnikov@google.com>
To: Joel Brobecker <brobecker@adacore.com>
Cc: gdb-patches@sourceware.org, Tom Tromey <tromey@redhat.com>
Subject: Re: [patch] Eliminate quadratic slow-down on number of solibs (part  	2).
Date: Tue, 12 May 2009 20:53:00 -0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <8ac60eac0905121353i4aae7110sebb34bec1de0d6d8@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20090512082530.GD7584@adacore.com>

On Tue, May 12, 2009 at 1:25 AM, Joel Brobecker <brobecker@adacore.com> wrote:

>> It feels like a hack, but I don't see how to achieve the same
>> result in a cleaner way :-(
>
> But I'm sympathetic to the issue - it's tough to have to wait
> an extra 20secs

Or extra 2 minutes in my case :-(

> when you know that you don't have any breakpoint
> refering to any SO... My thoughts on this: Perhaps a setting
> in the "maintenance set/show" that the user could change to deactivate
> breakpoint reset.

Note that the gdb-breakpoint-20090505.txt patch did not deactivate
breakpoint reset. It merely turned an O(N*N) operation into O(N)
operation, by resetting breakpoints once, after all solib symbols
have been loaded.

Because of that, your "maintenance set ..." suggestion doesn't
make sense to me: why would you ever want O(N*N) algorithm when an
O(N) one is available?

Thanks,
-- 
Paul Pluzhnikov


  reply	other threads:[~2009-05-12 20:53 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 17+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2009-05-06  0:50 Paul Pluzhnikov
2009-05-12  8:25 ` Joel Brobecker
2009-05-12 20:53   ` Paul Pluzhnikov [this message]
2009-05-13  9:27     ` Joel Brobecker
2009-05-13 18:11       ` Paul Pluzhnikov
2009-05-14  8:14         ` Joel Brobecker
2009-05-14 17:45           ` Paul Pluzhnikov
2009-05-14 19:23             ` Joel Brobecker
2009-05-14 23:35               ` Paul Pluzhnikov
     [not found]             ` <20090521151540.GH16152@adacore.com>
2009-05-21 16:17               ` Paul Pluzhnikov
2009-05-21 16:40                 ` Joel Brobecker
2009-05-30  2:08             ` Tom Tromey
2009-05-30  1:59 ` Tom Tromey
2009-06-03 19:46   ` Paul Pluzhnikov
2009-06-03 21:36     ` Tom Tromey
2009-05-12 19:43 Paul Pluzhnikov
2009-05-13  9:25 ` Joel Brobecker

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=8ac60eac0905121353i4aae7110sebb34bec1de0d6d8@mail.gmail.com \
    --to=ppluzhnikov@google.com \
    --cc=brobecker@adacore.com \
    --cc=gdb-patches@sourceware.org \
    --cc=tromey@redhat.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox