From: Adam Fedor <fedor@doc.com>
To: mec.gnu@mindspring.com (Michael Elizabeth Chastain)
Cc: ezannoni@redhat.com, cagney@gnu.org, gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com
Subject: Re: [rfa/symtab] Move find_pc_section call to lookup_minimal_symbol_by_pc
Date: Tue, 10 Feb 2004 16:38:00 -0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <8879D8D9-5BE7-11D8-A439-000A277AC1A4@doc.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20040209215812.6112F4B363@berman.michael-chastain.com>
On Monday, February 9, 2004, at 02:58 PM, Michael Elizabeth Chastain
wrote:
> For the kfail's, please use more specific patterns than just
> ".*$gdb_prompt $". kfail's should be for known bugs, which means
> there should be known-bad output. If the output doesn't match a
> specific known-bad output, then it means that gdb has regressed
> even more, and the KFAIL turns into a FAIL (this does happen).
>
>
The failure results in the test stopping somewhere in an internal
function. I think this changed in the different times it was broken,
and it might also change in between releases of the OS. So the actual
output might not be that useful for a KFAIL.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2004-02-10 16:38 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 24+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2004-02-09 21:58 Michael Elizabeth Chastain
2004-02-10 16:38 ` Adam Fedor [this message]
2004-02-16 18:11 ` Elena Zannoni
2004-02-17 4:47 ` Adam Fedor
2004-02-17 5:00 ` Daniel Jacobowitz
2004-02-17 14:23 ` Elena Zannoni
2004-02-18 3:40 ` Adam Fedor
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2004-01-27 22:23 Andrew Cagney
2004-01-27 22:52 ` Daniel Jacobowitz
2004-01-29 20:15 ` Elena Zannoni
2004-01-29 23:22 ` Andrew Cagney
2004-01-30 3:30 ` Adam Fedor
2004-01-30 4:53 ` Adam Fedor
2004-02-04 22:25 ` Elena Zannoni
2004-02-09 4:26 ` Adam Fedor
2004-02-09 15:31 ` Elena Zannoni
2004-01-30 3:29 ` Adam Fedor
2004-02-04 22:20 ` Elena Zannoni
2004-02-04 23:06 ` Andrew Cagney
2004-02-06 18:59 ` Andrew Cagney
2004-02-08 5:17 ` Adam Fedor
2004-02-09 15:35 ` Elena Zannoni
2004-02-09 16:40 ` Andrew Cagney
2004-02-09 17:54 ` Joel Brobecker
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=8879D8D9-5BE7-11D8-A439-000A277AC1A4@doc.com \
--to=fedor@doc.com \
--cc=cagney@gnu.org \
--cc=ezannoni@redhat.com \
--cc=gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com \
--cc=mec.gnu@mindspring.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox